The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2008, 05:00 AM   #1
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

I just did an NV3500 swap and I have 3.73 gears in the rear. I am thinking of going with 3.08 gears. I have 275/60-15's. Will the rpm's be to low at highway speeds to be feasable? I am not worried about take off since 1st gear is 4.03. I think high gear is about .73-.75.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 06:18 AM   #2
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

A change such as you suggest will make your RPMs drop by 546 revolutions. The 3.73 gears run out at about 3134 RPMs at 70 MPH and if you drop your gear ration to 3.08 gears, you should be around 2588 RPMs. I see that as a good exchange for your situation. The GM SBC likes that area of RPMs, as long as you have not done something to change the overall engine components---IN OTHER WORDS changed the cam profile or any other major engine work.

My 383 stroker motor runs down the highway at 2500 RPMs at 70 MPH and I did this with an OD tranny and 3.73 gears. It loves the pwoer curve at thsi speed and responds real well.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:44 PM   #3
Wrenchbender Ret
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Overland Park, Ks.
Posts: 5,206
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

You didn,t say what engine you are running. I,ve got a 70 stepside with 350 engine, 700-4R trans, & 29" dia tires. It drives great in o-drive & will pull long hills on the freeway with A/C on without downshifting. If I had something heavy to pull I could just use 3rd & still not over rev.
Wrenchbender Ret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:50 PM   #4
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrenchbender Ret View Post
You didn,t say what engine you are running. I,ve got a 70 stepside with 350 engine, 700-4R trans, & 29" dia tires. It drives great in o-drive & will pull long hills on the freeway with A/C on without downshifting. If I had something heavy to pull I could just use 3rd & still not over rev.
You didn't give your gear ratio, that is the deciding factor in this whole conversation. My guess fro your description, you are geared low.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:53 PM   #5
jamie72
Senior Member
 
jamie72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: madison indiana
Posts: 3,839
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

send huck a pm he did this swap in a 72 and was happy with the results.
__________________
jamie72
72 BB cheyenne -- Restoration getting started..

member #807



http://www.myspace.com/whitetailobsession
www.antlertalk.com
jamie72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:11 PM   #6
jamon8
Registered User
 
jamon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: southern Il
Posts: 335
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

I have the same set up

Its great and all you have to do is shift into 5th when you need it

any more questions feel free to ask

at 1500 rpms in 5th gear I am doing 68 and getting about 18-19 mpg with a lopy cam
jamon8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:27 PM   #7
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

Quote:
Originally Posted by piecesparts View Post
A change such as you suggest will make your RPMs drop by 546 revolutions. The 3.73 gears run out at about 3134 RPMs at 70 MPH and if you drop your gear ration to 3.08 gears, you should be around 2588 RPMs. I see that as a good exchange for your situation. The GM SBC likes that area of RPMs, as long as you have not done something to change the overall engine components---IN OTHER WORDS changed the cam profile or any other major engine work.

My 383 stroker motor runs down the highway at 2500 RPMs at 70 MPH and I did this with an OD tranny and 3.73 gears. It loves the pwoer curve at thsi speed and responds real well.
You're not figuring in the OD. With 3.08 gears and a .75 OD, the RPM will be 1940 RPM @ 70, and would be 2350 RPM @ 70. I personally would stay with 3.73's for the low end acceleration. If you frequently run 75-80 MPH on the freeway, then the 3.08 set-up would be a better choice. A 3.42 would be about perfect IMO.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:30 PM   #8
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

After a little research it seems that the majority of NV3500's have a .73 ratio OD, so make those numbers 1889 with 3.08's, and 2287 with 3.73's @ 70MPH. (not a whole lot of difference).
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 10:36 PM   #9
Brad
Out of the carpool lane.
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Clark Co, WA
Posts: 5,673
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

You don't mention what size engine you have, but regardless, you should really keep 3.73's in the rearend for best mileage which is what you're going for.
__________________

1968 C-10 SWB, 5.7 Vortec/700R4/3.73 posi, Torch Red
1968 Camaro, 250/Powerglide, all original (No, I'm not gonna drop a 350 in it!...Jeez!)
2000 Honda VFR in the faster yellow!
2008 Husqvarna TE-610

1967 C-10 SWB 'Six Appeal'-Gone but not forgotten...

Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 03:27 AM   #10
Huck
Senior Member
 
Huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,269
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

I had the 3500 pulling on a 308. My recommednation would be a 342 rear as it give you just a little better pull then the 308 but not the mpg issue of the 373. It really depends on how you want to compromise as that is inevitable. will you tow? Want a strong pull from a stop? MPG?
Huck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 05:01 AM   #11
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

Sorry for the lack of info. I have a 355 with about 320 horse. This truck will never pull anything. It is just to enjoy and drive once or twice a week. I probably won't drive it 5k miles a year. Gas is always an issue now. So gas mileage would be a little important. I was just thinking with the 4.03 first gear and 3.73 rear and the tire size I have that 1st gear would be almost useless. I just didn't want to go the other way and make OD useless on the other end if I used 3.07's
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 05:04 AM   #12
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

Also correct me if I'm wrong but I am probably in the 350 ft./lbs of torque range and I would think that would be plenty to hold 60-65 which is about as fast as I would run.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 05:50 AM   #13
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

If you are going to be going any faster than 60-65 there is no way in the world I'd go with 3.08's. You're engine is not making anywhere close to 350 ft./lbs at 1600, which is where you will be in OD at that speed. Pushing one of these bricks at that low of RPM with a SBC is going to like to eat more than it would with the 3.73's in my experience.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 11:18 AM   #14
Brad
Out of the carpool lane.
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Clark Co, WA
Posts: 5,673
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?


Also, if only 5000 miles/year, why even spend the money? You're stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime.
__________________

1968 C-10 SWB, 5.7 Vortec/700R4/3.73 posi, Torch Red
1968 Camaro, 250/Powerglide, all original (No, I'm not gonna drop a 350 in it!...Jeez!)
2000 Honda VFR in the faster yellow!
2008 Husqvarna TE-610

1967 C-10 SWB 'Six Appeal'-Gone but not forgotten...


Last edited by Brad; 03-11-2008 at 11:19 AM.
Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 05:02 PM   #15
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,861
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

I agree 3.42 is as low of gearing you`d want with o/d.3.08s may be ok for flatland,but you`d chew up more gas trying to pull hills in o/d.To me,running 3.08s is like having o/d.That ratio loves the hiway.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 05:17 PM   #16
Huck
Senior Member
 
Huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,269
Re: 5 spd. and 3.08 gears. Bad idea?

thinnking it through---most stock 350--auto--came with 308 and pulled just fine. But they also got like 14mpg. My 72 crate with the 3500 trans and 308 pulled ok highway. Would downshift on long steap hills to maintain 70mph. When towing a trailer, I was in 4th most of the time.
Used stock 235x75R15's. My 2002 2wd extcab has the 5.3 auto and 373 tow package with 17" rubber. I get 18-19 mpg highway. neighbor has similar setup with 342 gears. he can get 20-21mpg and occasionally tows also with no big deal. I like 373 gears but with the price of gas ---heading towards $4 a gal, I would prefer the 342's but as mentioned, the price to change would probably take 10 years of driving to justify!! So--I'll just keep air pressure up a bit and keep my foot out of it a bit. Huck
Huck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com