The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2002, 08:39 PM   #1
Dandeluxe
Senior Member
 
Dandeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: st.louis mo.
Posts: 717
Question Stock Height Stance????

I PUT ALL NEW SPRINGS, KYB GAS SHOCKS, ALL NEW FRONT END PARTS, BUT NOW HAVE DECIDED I DONT LIKE THE FACTORY STANCE, TOO MUCH RAKE IN THE BACK. MY ? IS, WOULD ME CHANGING THE REAR SPRINGS IN THE REAR MAKE MY TRUCK SIT LEVEL. I LIKE THE FRONT STANCE BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IT THE SAME IN THE REAR. MAYBE 2 INCH LOWER SPRINGS IN THE REAR MIGHT MAKE IT SET THE WAY I WANT? ANY IDEAS?
Attached Images
 
__________________
1969 cst swb 350/400 th . DANNY C .
["]FRIENDS DONT LET FRIENDS DRIVE F@RD$!!


1969 cst swb corvette hugger orange with 400 hp sbc

I started out with nothing and i held on to it
Dandeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2002, 10:15 PM   #2
Primered_69
Registered User
 
Primered_69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,409
Hey I know you wanted advice but I just wanted to tell you that even with the absence of primer you got one nice looking truck
__________________
1969 Chevy LWB - with shaved handles; 3 1/2 front/ 5 1/2 rear drop; (waiting to be put back together)
Primered_69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2002, 11:07 PM   #3
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
You might try a 2" lowering block in the rear......I think it would get you pretty close. Pics can make it hard to say for sure, but it looks to be 2-2 1/2 " higher at the rear. Good luck......crazy AL
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2002, 09:11 PM   #4
73GMC
Proud American
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great State of Texas, USA
Posts: 97
Talking lower the rear

It would be best to use 2" lowering springs.

crazy AL- Can't use lowering block on coil rear suspension, you probably knew that already but I figure you were thinkin about 73-87's.
73GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2002, 11:09 PM   #5
Alvin
Never Done?
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,435
As far as i know, you can buy lowering blocks for coil spring equipped trucks, they just go under the axle and above the control arm, and come with longer u-bolts. Someone correct me if I am wrong!
__________________
Ethel - The Legend Continues...

Ethel has been sold.
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2002, 08:27 AM   #6
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
Yes, you can use lowering blocks on coil spring trucks.......the axle is mounted above the trail arm from the factory. Alvin is right on, the kits come with longer U bolts. On the leaf spring trucks you cant use lowering blocks........they would be a lift block, as the axle sits under the spring.........Crazy AL
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 07:24 PM   #7
HvyChevy454
Slowly getting CRSS...
 
HvyChevy454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lutz, Florida
Posts: 656
i made my own lowering blocks and just bought longer u bolts
__________________
-Nic
Lutz, Fl
My Team Website
The Heavy Chevy Website
------------------
  • 72 Cheyenne 10 LWB GM 12-bolt 3.08 w/ Auburn Posi
    91 454 Edel Performer RPM Intake 750 cfm carb Comp Cam 268/.495 Hedman Headers Dual 3'' Exhaust
  • 71 Cheyenne 20 4x4 Fact. A/C PS PB Tilt Currently in the works...
Speak Softly and Carry A Big Block...
There is No replacement for Displacement...
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."
- Mario Andretti

HvyChevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2002, 10:04 AM   #8
jmil1974
Ain't we cute?
 
jmil1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 700
Heavy,

Do you have any pinion angle issues like vibration or worn ujoints? That's the only possible downside I see to this method. How far down did you go?
__________________
69 C10 2WD LWB Fleet 350/350 power front disc conversion (6 lug disc kit from gmcpauls) and new engine, PS, A/C, fresh fluids, SHE DRIVES!
FOR SALE $3900
jmil1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2002, 02:18 AM   #9
blowermtr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Beaufort, SC/ Georgetown, TX
Posts: 13
Drop

Chevy likes the 2 inch snow plow effect. Your truck (if at origianal stance) should be two inches higher in the rear. Lowering springs would be your best option. You have two others though. One is to cut the springs but a machine shop would have to reshape the coil because the top and bottom coils of the spring are smaller diameter than the rest (not a problem in the front however if you later decide you want to drop it too, in the front only the top has a smaller diameter so you can cut the bottom, then heat it up and pound the coil flat to sit on your control arm.) Back to the rear. They are also progressive coils so when you chop the top or bottom the new top or bottom coils will be closer. In essence it will be a little stiffer, in actuality you won't notice a thing. The other option is not suggested but fun to do, especially if you are going to get different springs anyway. Until you get them if you want it lower, just heat the coils to see what you are going to have. Do one side at a time and take it slow. It isn't as hard as everyone says to make it acuarate but just take it slow and measure off the tire to the fender. The bump stops may not be acurate. Warning: if you go to far there is no turning back. You may be chopping the front springs too. Best of luck.

Mike D

67/68 slammed, blown C10 so close
blowermtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2002, 10:36 AM   #10
Dandeluxe
Senior Member
 
Dandeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: st.louis mo.
Posts: 717
SPRINGS?

thanks to all you guys for all your suggestions, i think im gonna go with 2 inch lower springs from early classic, i think this would get me close to what i want , which is even stance front and back
__________________
1969 cst swb 350/400 th . DANNY C .
["]FRIENDS DONT LET FRIENDS DRIVE F@RD$!!


1969 cst swb corvette hugger orange with 400 hp sbc

I started out with nothing and i held on to it
Dandeluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2002, 12:24 PM   #11
HvyChevy454
Slowly getting CRSS...
 
HvyChevy454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lutz, Florida
Posts: 656
i did a 2 1/2'' drop w/ square tubing it helped straightend out the pinion angle and so far i have not seen any paprticular amounts of wear, i just need to put an adjustabe panhard bar on it.
__________________
-Nic
Lutz, Fl
My Team Website
The Heavy Chevy Website
------------------
  • 72 Cheyenne 10 LWB GM 12-bolt 3.08 w/ Auburn Posi
    91 454 Edel Performer RPM Intake 750 cfm carb Comp Cam 268/.495 Hedman Headers Dual 3'' Exhaust
  • 71 Cheyenne 20 4x4 Fact. A/C PS PB Tilt Currently in the works...
Speak Softly and Carry A Big Block...
There is No replacement for Displacement...
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."
- Mario Andretti

HvyChevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2002, 08:26 PM   #12
HvyChevy454
Slowly getting CRSS...
 
HvyChevy454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lutz, Florida
Posts: 656
heres a pic
Attached Images
 
__________________
-Nic
Lutz, Fl
My Team Website
The Heavy Chevy Website
------------------
  • 72 Cheyenne 10 LWB GM 12-bolt 3.08 w/ Auburn Posi
    91 454 Edel Performer RPM Intake 750 cfm carb Comp Cam 268/.495 Hedman Headers Dual 3'' Exhaust
  • 71 Cheyenne 20 4x4 Fact. A/C PS PB Tilt Currently in the works...
Speak Softly and Carry A Big Block...
There is No replacement for Displacement...
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough."
- Mario Andretti

HvyChevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2024, 10:18 PM   #13
HoneyBeeMan68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Northern, Iowa
Posts: 53
Re: Stock Height Stance????

is it made that way so when you load up the back you are now level?
HoneyBeeMan68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2024, 09:20 AM   #14
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
Re: Stock Height Stance????

I would go with the spring option. If you go blocks you could get into scrub line issues depending up on the block you are running and your tire/wheel combination. That is, if you have a flat the bottom of the trailing arm would drag the ground.

Super nice truck, by the way. More photos inside and out in this thread would not be a disappointment.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2024, 11:40 AM   #15
leegreen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 870
Re: Stock Height Stance????

21 year old thread, but still a valid question.

If you look at old brochures you will see this is not the stock stance, they were much closer to level.
I'd guess someone sold OP springs from a heavy half/camper special longbox.

Chevelle / full size sedan springs will bolt right into trailing arm trucks. A set from a wagon will give you a couple inches drop and a softer ride. Add some air shocks if you occasionally need to carry a load.
leegreen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2024, 11:13 AM   #16
Dead Parrot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,585
Re: Stock Height Stance????

Quote:
Originally Posted by leegreen View Post
21 year old thread, but still a valid question.

If you look at old brochures you will see this is not the stock stance, they were much closer to level.
I'd guess someone sold OP springs from a heavy half/camper special longbox.

Chevelle / full size sedan springs will bolt right into trailing arm trucks. A set from a wagon will give you a couple inches drop and a softer ride. Add some air shocks if you occasionally need to carry a load.
Very possible that the original owner or near to it was going for the 'Muscle Car' look. That was very popular in the early 70's.
Dead Parrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com