The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2011, 05:45 PM   #1
jonzcustomshop
1961 crewcab
 
jonzcustomshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
sectioned crossmember

any ins and outs on sectioning the front crossmember?
I have lots of time, but no cash so no dropmember...

page 3 of dinos "a suburban joins the herd" thread has some good pics.

questions:
how and what bracketry for the raised upper control arm mount?
what about the motor mounts? ( will be for a V8)
how about the steering?-does it need to be moved?

any other issues?
jonzcustomshop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 08:37 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,964
Re: sectioned crossmember

Quote:
how and what bracketry for the raised upper control arm mount?
The upper control arms mount the same way. The holes on the side of the frame just need to be re-drilled higher up on the frame rail. One or more of the lower bolt holes might align w/pre-existing holes in the frame rail & might just require only slight elongation. The original upper bolt holes will no longer be usable so you'll need to drill 2 new ones.
Quote:
what about the motor mounts? ( will be for a V8)
OE motor mounts & stanchions work if you section the x-member from the middle (CaptKaos' method). If you simply sink the rails into the x-member, you'll have to fab new stanchions or modify the OE units.
Quote:
how about the steering?-does it need to be moved?
Define 'need'? The steering can/does work as is but is not likely to be optimum. The steering shaft doesn't have much clearance above the upper drivers side a-arm so the alternatives are a) limited static drop: 2" drop coils would prob be the max before you have to be concerned about contact during hard suspension compression; b) notch the upper a-arm to ensure the OE type steering shaft can't make contact; c) utilize u-joints & re-route a new multi-piece steering shaft arrangement higher above the upper a-arm; d) use aftermarket a-arms designed for OE shaft clearance (michigan metal works makes 'em) or e) No Limits R&P swap kit.
Quote:
any other issues?
The combination of parts each different truck has dictates if there might be other interference related issues. Some guys have done 1.5" & not have clearance issues, others can't even go 1.5" w/o major cleance problems.

The same notched x-member required alot more clearancing (& shims to reverse some of the notch) to work in my 68 chassis but then didn't require the shims when installed into an 89 chassis (yet had the same clearance). The notched x-member was a 73-80 vintage.

Once the x-member is notched, there's no access to the upper a-arm studs for servicing. In the OE location, there are access holes in the frame. Tack them in place to make sure they don't spin or be prepared for the extra effort if they need servicing as they're too high to re-drill 'new' access holes.

Verify your planned engine oil pan depth. I originally set my notched x-member up in a 68 chassis using a sbc & was ok. When I swapped it to the 89 chassis, the BBC OE truck oil pan was now approx 1" below the lowest portion of the x-member.... NOT GOOD! I had to get a smaller depth car pan to keep the x-member just slightly lower (barely @ that).

You'll likely need to relocate the upper shock mounts for better shock length dimensions.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 08:59 PM   #3
Dinos63
chevy only
 
Dinos63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,619
Re: sectioned crossmember

good info, i had good luck with the one i did. i ran it for a long time... til nate had the idea about the dropmember, i step my control arms which help out on the chamber issues
__________________
CHEVY ONLY... Nothin Else !
Dinos63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 09:11 PM   #4
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: sectioned crossmember

Funny this comes up now. I just picked up a spare for pancaking the other day. I am thinking I'll move it forward 1" at the same time, just to be sure it's not too easy
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 09:53 PM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,964
Re: sectioned crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frizzle Fry View Post
Funny this comes up now. I just picked up a spare for pancaking the other day. I am thinking I'll move it forward 1" at the same time, just to be sure it's not too easy
Are you planning the R&P upgrade too then? I just don't see moving it forward w/the OE box & links.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 08:04 PM   #6
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: sectioned crossmember

Still in the design phase. I could go that route. What's the issue with the box?
Posted via Mobile Device
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 08:20 PM   #7
baggedbigblock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rich Virginia
Posts: 336
Re: sectioned crossmember

hope these pics may help. Raised 2" with performance online motor mounts cut and welded.









This is how she sits with 2.5" spindles and cupped lower arm with bags (rear was up 2" in pic)

baggedbigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com