The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2004, 10:20 AM   #1
caspear78
Registered User
 
caspear78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: biwabik, minnesota, what is this white stuff out here
Posts: 334
fuel inj..

is any one runnin any fuel injections on thier trucks , and how much of a diff has it made going from carb to fuel injection, has it increased your gas milege at all
caspear78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 10:25 AM   #2
FRENCHBLUE72
PROJECT 7DEUCE
 
FRENCHBLUE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,608
Board member BOBBYK has done the swap you may want to p.m. him if he don't anwser here..
__________________
GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS



MEMBER #6377

72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free.

Project "7DEUCE"

check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665



Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P..
FRENCHBLUE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 12:58 PM   #3
tomsC10R
Registered User
 
tomsC10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 281
I'm going to be running Holley MPI. Should be done in a few weeks. Won't be able to comment on mileage improvements because I only drove the truck maybe 3 times before I tore it apart for winter. I'm not sure if you were thinking of buying a complete system or what... I bought my MPI Projection system over Ebay from a private party, never used. Very complete kit, but pretty pricey new. I didn't pay a whole lot more than a new intake and a good carb would have costed. Goodluck.
__________________
Tom

1968 C10 LWB. 402 BB, Holley MPI, 700R4. 4wheel Hydroboost Disk Brakes.

Last edited by tomsC10R; 04-10-2004 at 01:03 PM.
tomsC10R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 02:01 PM   #4
71gmcfanatic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 101
The way fuel prices are going i may be switching to FI also. Most likely the holley tbi system or a used gm tbi system. Does anyone have any experience with the holley tbi?
__________________
1971 gmc 3/4 ton, 350, t350
71gmcfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 03:40 PM   #5
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
I have known a couple of guys change over to fuel, TPI,and or Tbi.. The newer Holley kits work very well.

Yes you will get an increase in mileage. how much is hard to say.. Either go to a wrecking yard for everything you need, or watch E-bay, when I was seriously considering it, I watched ebay, there is a lot of them there. Just remember you need to match the donors computer's output to the H.P. of your engine, It really is a great way to go.

Check these web sites out for more info.

http://www.autoshopracingengines.com/fuel.htm


http://www.chevythunder.com/index.htm
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 08:23 AM   #6
BobbyK
Registered User
 
BobbyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Petrolia,Ontario,Canada but working in Port Huron,Mi.
Posts: 1,771
Ya I did mt TPI swap about 3 years ago now.
Definite increase in low end tourque.I gained maybe 50miles more to the tankfull,better drivability,quick startups.
It was win win in my case.
__________________
71 blazer,350SBC,approx.375HP,700R4,factory GM TPI.Dual electric fans,33x12.5x15 ATR on stock suspension.
Petrolia,Ontario,Canada but working in Port Huron,MI.
See ALL my Blazer pic's HERE
BobbyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 11:40 AM   #7
Faster_than_you
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Virginia beach, Va
Posts: 209
if your going to get a gm tpi set up. try get the 87-88 corvette, or 89-90 camaro setup. In the books I have read supposubly they have been the ones that produced the most amount of horsepower, and the most reliable. In my vette I recieved about 27 mpg at 55, and 21 mpg at 95. I usually got 21. I sold the car on valentines day this year, with 126k on it, never had a problem with the tpi. I installed 40 lb injectors I think that was the size. was 4 years ago I did that.
anyways, I would say injection is the way to go.
__________________
~Christopher L. Orr
71 c20, 454- Stolen While Deployed. dynoed at 550 ft lbs, 425 hp at 3000 rpm (mustang dyno). TH400 3500 stall.... etc, etc.
Faster_than_you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 11:55 AM   #8
caspear78
Registered User
 
caspear78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: biwabik, minnesota, what is this white stuff out here
Posts: 334
so would i have to rebuild my moter for a mpi setup or is it just bolt on, as in the intake and such from there up
caspear78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 12:08 PM   #9
jmanz69
Careful, they attack...
 
jmanz69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Waterford, MI, USA
Posts: 1,107
If you go with a TPI setup from a later model, like the 88-92, then you will either need to have the manifold modified or have new heads to accept the intake. The 4 center bolt holes are at a different angle in the later year TPI. The aftermarket MPI should bolt right on. The real question is this. How long will it take to recover the cost of the FI with the savings on gas. The answer varies, but is usually around 4-5 years. If you use it as a daily driver, it will be less, but if it's a sometimes driver it will take a lot longer. I would maybe think about changing your rear gears if you want more MPG. Would only cost a couple hundred dollars, and mould make a bigger difference. I am going to TPI because I want the quicker throttle response and better torque, not for MPG. It's my toy car, so it doen't need to get good mileage.

Just something to think about.
jmanz69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 07:22 PM   #10
Bowtie67
Registered User
 
Bowtie67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,266
MPFI is the way to go if you are looking for best MPG, There are some limitations with the GM TPI for all out performance, RPM band is limited. The TBI setup as well has it's limitations as well, There are only two injectors so High HP is not associated with TBI units. Holler makes a Projection system in many flavors from a 2BBL to 900CFM 4BBL. There are several manufacturers out there that offer FI. I have been unsing Holley setups now for about 5yrs. My last setup with a hipo 350 w/10.2cr and 700R4 w/2200 stall and 3:73 gears I averaged 22mpg Highway and around 17city. I have not fired up my new engine 414SBC and the new Holley StealthRam setup. I am hoping in the next couple of weeks to finish up all new rewiring, Rear Suspension and redoing the interior.


__________________
1967 C10 - SWBSS Pro Street 427sbc, 700R4 & 4.10 Gears
1948 Chevy FleetMaster Coupe, LS1, (almost done)
1950 Chevy StyleLine Coupe 250/6 3x2 Dueces
2009 Toyota Tundra
1996 Harley RoadKing

"I maybe getting old, but I can still burn rubber with the best of them"
Bowtie67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 09:09 PM   #11
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
While not in my truck, I put on a Hilborn in my Chevy II and converted it to efi. Works and looks excellent. Gas mileage is better then the Eldelbrock dual plane intake I had before. I have another one that may end up in the 72 GMC but that's a year or two away(I got too many things on my plate).
Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 09:14 PM   #12
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally posted by caspear78
so would i have to rebuild my moter for a mpi setup or is it just bolt on, as in the intake and such from there up
You do not have to build a Motor for the Injection unit... You build the injection for the motor..

If you're running a stock rock smallblock, then an injection unit off of any regular car/truck will work. But if you have it boosted a little H.P. then the Trans-Am, Corvette, Hi Output Camaro's and the such work.
The one website I listed above is very descriptive, and helpful with what unit to choose for what engine output.

Just do some research. you'll learn some good information.
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 09:21 PM   #13
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally posted by Shane65
While not in my truck, I put on a Hilborn in my Chevy II and converted it to efi. Works and looks excellent. Gas mileage is better then the Eldelbrock dual plane intake I had before. I have another one that may end up in the 72 GMC but that's a year or two away(I got too many things on my plate).

Shane,

Dynamite setup !!! And welcome to the site.. This is a setup I have considered running since the 60's... Air cleaners are the only thing that stopped me.. And I have alsways lived in the boonies, generally dirt roads.. I bid on a complete belt driven setup on E-bay from Canada a year or so ago.. But I got sniped..... How did you do the conversion??

By the way,, Let us see some full shots of that Nova...

Last edited by RON WOODGEARD; 04-11-2004 at 09:25 PM.
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 09:39 PM   #14
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
Here's a shot of the removeable air cleans I made out of stainless steel. I topped them off with K&N's. I can remove them in 10 seconds without any tools.




Here's a link to some pictures of my car.

http://groups.msn.com/SNS2/65shane.msnw

Last edited by Shane65; 04-11-2004 at 11:42 PM.
Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2004, 11:21 PM   #15
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally posted by Shane65
Here's a shot of the removeable air cleans I made out of stailess steel. I topped them off with K&N's. I can remove them in 10 seconds without any tools.




Here's a link to some pictures of my car.

http://groups.msn.com/SNS2/65shane.msnw
*****en Car !! Nice interior job.. But I missed the air cleaners..
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 08:41 PM   #16
caspear78
Registered User
 
caspear78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: biwabik, minnesota, what is this white stuff out here
Posts: 334
i love the pics of the setups, now i get to drool over them until i get mine setup,lol
caspear78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 09:19 PM   #17
Perchjerker
Beer Power!!!!!!!!!!
 
Perchjerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nacogdoches, TX
Posts: 280
Not to sound like a aszhole, but if I wanted better gas mileage I would drive a different vehicle. I save my carb-ed Chevy truck because, well, it isn't FI like most vehicles you see on the road now. Also, I can mess around with it and tune it like I want it. I just don't see any justification for changing your antique vehicle to meet todays standards. Isn't that the point of owning an old truck?
__________________
Rather be fishin'
Perchjerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 09:48 PM   #18
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally posted by Perchjerker
Not to sound like a aszhole, but if I wanted better gas mileage I would drive a different vehicle. I save my carb-ed Chevy truck because, well, it isn't FI like most vehicles you see on the road now. Also, I can mess around with it and tune it like I want it. I just don't see any justification for changing your antique vehicle to meet todays standards. Isn't that the point of owning an old truck?
thought the idea of owning a vehicle old or new, was transportation,, but along with that transportation is the idea of being able to play with it, and that involves doing whatever trips our triggers,, You can play with Fuel injection just as you can a Carb. I can see a lot of justification to updating,.... It's called having fun...
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 09:57 PM   #19
jmanz69
Careful, they attack...
 
jmanz69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Waterford, MI, USA
Posts: 1,107
There is nothing wrong with updating, In fact, it will be fun to see what I can get out of the TPI. But, I don't think anyone should think of switching to FI to save money. The cost involved is the switchover is too high to make it worth it unless you do a lot of driving, and I mean A LOT. It's a switch to do in a toy car, not your daily driver. Yes, it will help with mileage, but not in a dramatic way. You aren't going to go from 10 MPG to 30. Just have fun with it, and do what you want to. It's your truck.
jmanz69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 10:11 PM   #20
71Blazer
Goodbye Darlin'
 
71Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Coupeville, WA USA
Posts: 330
Quote:
You do not have to build a Motor for the Injection unit... You build the injection for the motor..
I installed a TPI unit from an 86 Corvette in my 71. While it is true that these intakes are direct a bolt-on for any small block I have to say there are a few key factors that will make or break the project... at least it did for me.

Cam overlap is extremely important. I have a Comp Cam HE268 which has a barely noticeable lope at idle and worked great with a carburetor. However the overlap for this cam is 110* and didn't allow the air to flow properly.

Displacement turned out to be a concern as well. My small block turned out to be a .060 over 400. At 413ci the TPI couldn't flow enough air to keep up with the engine.

I had an ACCEL DFI computer so all parameters for air and fuel were totally programmable but the basic problem was the intake and engine were a mis-match.

All the problems I encountered could easily be solved with more time and more money but I ran out of both.

So to make a long reply short; the intake and engine were mis-matched. I learned a lot over the course of this project. And it went something like this: re-install carburetor
__________________
1971 Blazer CST SOLD!
71Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 10:42 PM   #21
454_72_4X4
Registered User
 
454_72_4X4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: N.E. MO
Posts: 1,749
I'm new here too but I just have to chime in here.
I've been thinking about the FI swap thing for a few years now. I'd like to do both of my trucks.
(72 454 and 87 S-10 35)
I've got a complete TBI setup from an early 90's motorhome (454), and a TPI intake / computer from a 1990 Camaro (305).

First the 72;
By complete TBI system I mean everything right down to the ignition switch and the key. (The best part is the motor home used the same style indash switch as my 72!!)
The only wires that were cut are the ones that go to the fuel pump/sender.
My 454 specs;
Basically a stock rebuild
(.030 over TRW forged flattops)
Comp Cams 268H
and (hopefully if I can find one) an Edelbrock Performer intake

Questions;
1. Would the forged pistons cause to much noise for the knock sensor on the TBI?
2. Would the cam be compatible with the stock ECM/prom?
Right now I can't really afford to have a "custom" chip. So would it run with the stocker? I think it would run but maybe not be "perfect"?
3. How hard would the actual installation be? By this I mostly mean the wiring and possibly the fuel pump. I've got a fuel tank from a mid/late 70's Surburban that I'd like to put under the truck also.
4. Has anybody did this to show me some pics?

Now the S-10;
All I have is the intake and computer. I know I have to have a wiring harness.
Questions;
1. Where/who to get the best/cheapest harness from. I've looked at the Painless harnesses in Summit and Jegs but I don't know how they do the VSS and VATS?
2. How would I do the VSS since I run a NV3500 5 speed and have no way to hook up the speedometer?
3. I know my curent cam is to big to run the TPI with. (Comp Cams EX268H), cause it carries around 11 inches of vacuum at idle. Looking for cam recomencdations.

Enough for now! Sorry for the long post but any help is appreciated.

__________________
72 C20 4X4 454 4 speed
89 Trans Am (was) 305 TPI 700r4
93 C1500 2wd Extended cab 350 700r4
98 Sonoma (TPI outa the Trans Am)
03 Yamaha 660 Raptor
03/04 660 Raptor
07 700 Raptor
85 Honda Odyssey
454_72_4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 10:55 PM   #22
jku72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: cornville, maine
Posts: 659
I put a holley Pro-jection system on my 67 Catalinas 455, and it works great. Excellent throttle response, so easy to optimize with a laptop, engine starts immediately, I'm happy with its performance. For what I use the car for, it is what I want.
That being said, as I build my 68 burb into my daily driver, I don't think I'll inject it. The truth for me is that the cost of the unit compared to the return is not justified for the purposes I need. By running a well tuned Qjet, I get good mileage, and although fuel injection might pick up a mile or two per gallon, for the 2 grand that a complete system installed would cost, it just isn't worth it. Especially when you consider maintenence of parts. The fuel pump for a 350 is 15 dollars. A whole new carb is $300, and a rebuild kit is $30.
I like the simplicity of the stock carb setup, theres not a lot of thinking involved with trouble shooting. If there is a problem with the fuel injection unit on I-95, I'd have to call a wrecker for sure.
__________________
jku Cornville, Maine

68 C10 burb
42 Willys MB
46 Dodge WF-32 1.5 ton
53 & 56 Olds'
60 Cadillac
22 Dodge Brothers
jku72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com