The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2005, 01:17 AM   #1
bigbluthng
Registered User
 
bigbluthng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: canyon country, ca, USA
Posts: 336
96-98 chevy/gmc trucks and 96-99 full size vans have the vortec engine. i have heard to get the 062 casting heads rather than the 906 castings because the 906s don't flow as well on the exhaust side. i know a guy that does cylinder head porting and said it's boloney.check out recyler.com for local deals. most of the intake gasket failures are related to overheating.
you probably already know a properly tuned q jet will perform like fuel injection; smooth and reliable with great economy. if you really plan on keeping the 350 trans, consider swapping out the gears in your rear to some numerically lower.
__________________
bigbluthng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 03:47 AM   #2
Tim240Z
Senior Member
 
Tim240Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LAX area, So Cal
Posts: 499
96+ Vortec 5.7 in my 71 Cheyenne

For various reasons (which I won't bother going in to), I need to convert my truck to squeeze as much fuel mileage out my truck as possible.
I am currently running a rebuilt (by me) 350 with vortec heads and L98 Vette cam grind and RPM performer intake and 750DP, and TH350.
I've considered just putting in a OD tranny, but after much soul searching, I've decided to transplant with a 5.7 Vortec out of a 96+ chevy truck or sub.
I've searched through pages and pages here and found a little info, but nothing really substantial.
I have no problem with the conversion, it should be as close to bolt on as can be (done an LT1/T56 in my 240Z , as well as many other conversions).

What I am looking for is info on any particular issues with engines that I should look for....reliability issues (I saw something about intake gaskets), any idiocincracies with the engine/tranny that I should be on the lookout for.

Thanks,
Tim
__________________
1972 Suburban C20
454/TH700R4, eaton-corporate 4.10 (looking for 3.7)



Sold: 71 Cheyenne 20
Installed a 99 5.7L L31/4L60E from Suburban 1500 (2005)
Tim240Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 04:26 AM   #3
Leinie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 2,613
If your replacement engine had orange antifreeze in it- replace all the gaskets that contacted that crap.

How much MPG increase do you expect to get ?
Leinie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 04:34 AM   #4
Tim240Z
Senior Member
 
Tim240Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LAX area, So Cal
Posts: 499
Right now I get about 10 with a tailwind....hoping for 15-18 on the freeway.
__________________
1972 Suburban C20
454/TH700R4, eaton-corporate 4.10 (looking for 3.7)



Sold: 71 Cheyenne 20
Installed a 99 5.7L L31/4L60E from Suburban 1500 (2005)
Tim240Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 04:58 AM   #5
incoma
Registered User
 
incoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 865
I've head of 20+ with a newer model fuel injected engine (LS1 style) and a 4L60E transmission properly tuned.
incoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com