|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-24-2007, 01:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
64-66 CHEVY JUNKIE
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cypress ,Texas
Posts: 1,516
|
posit.3:42 disk,rearend.
Will this unit fit a 66 c/10. I know it will need some welding done, but is it worth the problems? Its a 99 trans am lt1 with positrack. disk brake and 3:42 gears.. the guy has a couple of them at a very good price.
|
|
|
|
04-24-2007, 05:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: memphis tn, (nutbush)
Posts: 160
|
Re: posit.3:42 disk,rearend.
i dont think is has the same lug pattern
__________________
ridin big yo 5in cpp lowerin springs in back lowered 3in in front with cut springs for now 5 lug swap and disk in front 5 lug and disk in the rear with 3.23 gears mild 350/400heads 7547weiand intake 600 Edelbrock chrome block hugger headers 2 1/2 pipes in to a x pipes super 40 flows and turn downs turbo 350 with shift kit |
|
|
|
|
04-24-2007, 09:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
|
Re: posit.3:42 disk,rearend.
You shouldn't fart around with that. You should put it on a pallet and send it to my house so I can put it in my 91 Camaro!
Seriously, I think there would be a lot of issues with an install. Sping Perches, e-brake cables, u-joint yoke, lug pattern (likely 5 x 4.75) and width. On the plus side, the brakes are terrific and it is a pretty good rear (not bomb proof, but good)- but a good bit of work to make it all happen. Best S-D |
|
|
|
|
04-25-2007, 10:28 AM
|
#4 |
|
64-66 CHEVY JUNKIE
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cypress ,Texas
Posts: 1,516
|
Re: posit.3:42 disk,rearend.
Thanks for the intel.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
