Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-18-2017, 11:03 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Faith,NC
Posts: 1,626
|
Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Like the title says, aside from maybe a cold air intake, is it pointless to run long tube headers on a stock engine? If the Camaro exhaust manifolds are good to 450 HP, are any gains to be had from the headers?
Thanks! |
08-18-2017, 11:09 AM | #2 |
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,545
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
I think you answered your own question! Why through money at something that isn't needed and improve driveability etc. just my opinion.
__________________
Clyde65 Rebuild of Clyde http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184 69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684 support our troops! |
08-18-2017, 11:17 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Indanapolis, IN
Posts: 603
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Of course there are gains to be had. Just because something is "good to xxx hp" does not mean it is the best.
|
08-18-2017, 11:53 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Faith,NC
Posts: 1,626
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
I knew there would be differing opinions! Let's hear some more!
|
08-18-2017, 12:57 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: American Canyon, CA
Posts: 253
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7_lSU3D0jw
Check out the vid. Pretty interesting info with actual data to back it up. |
08-18-2017, 01:07 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: American Canyon, CA
Posts: 253
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7_lSU3D0jw
Check out the vid. Pretty interesting info with actual data to back it up. |
08-18-2017, 01:10 PM | #7 |
Post Whore
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,662
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
i went with headers more for looks than power...very little difference in todays LS engines between the two...here's the clickable link...https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7_lSU3D0jw
|
08-18-2017, 05:11 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Indanapolis, IN
Posts: 603
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Good video. They make some good points like how long tubes really come alive with a cam swap.
I would anticipate the hooker cast manifolds are *slightly* better than the average truck/tbss manifolds. Probably not more than a few (less than 5) hp though. |
08-18-2017, 05:31 PM | #9 |
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
About a week after you make ~450hp, you'll want 451hp, and then be mad you have to buy exhaust stuff again Thus has been my experience.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
|
08-18-2017, 06:01 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence Mo
Posts: 4,118
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
It took you a week?
__________________
My '72 short bed build. http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...6-0-4l80e.html 5.3 swap into my RUSTY '71 C10 http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversion...71-c-10-a.html |
08-18-2017, 11:02 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: King, NC
Posts: 63
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
I put a set of long tubes, cold air intake and a programmer on a 2001 Z71 with a 5.3 and they definitely helped the truck make more power. I was running 285/75/16's and they made it feel stronger than it did when it had the stock tires on it. The headers also made it sound awesome with high flow cats and a Magnaflow muffler.
|
08-19-2017, 07:01 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 1,639
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
One of the guys at the engine shop told me he's met guys like me and it won't end until I'm running a top fuel car.
__________________
1970 C-10 LWB "Blu" Instagram (current build pictures) 70_nc_c10 |
08-19-2017, 07:30 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Faith,NC
Posts: 1,626
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
|
08-25-2017, 03:33 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northeast KS
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Long tubes will make more power across the board over factory cast manifolds. **You must get the ECU tuned to pull all of the benefits.** A 5.3l doesn't require giant primaries either.
A good tuner will pull some great power with just the ECU tune alone, my 2500HD runs like a scalded dog with all the GM mandated neutering removed.
__________________
1999 GMC Suburban K2500 SLT, 454/4L80E 1991 Z/28, 6.0L/T56 1949 GMC 250, S10 Frame, 6.0L/4L80E Instagram @aceshighspeedshop |
08-25-2017, 10:34 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Faith,NC
Posts: 1,626
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
I have googled this engine (LM7) and it looks like it is about 285 HP in stock configuration. What would it take to be in the 400HP range? I'm guessing a mild cam, full length headers, cold air intake, and a tune. How about mid-length headers instead? What can I expect with the above and mid length headers?
Thoughts? Comments? |
08-25-2017, 11:02 PM | #16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northeast KS
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Quote:
__________________
1999 GMC Suburban K2500 SLT, 454/4L80E 1991 Z/28, 6.0L/T56 1949 GMC 250, S10 Frame, 6.0L/4L80E Instagram @aceshighspeedshop |
|
08-26-2017, 07:41 AM | #17 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 1,639
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
Quote:
Come over and look at my build spreadsheet. We need to either scare you straight or make sure you know what you are getting into. If my wife found that one excel page i made and took it to court in a divorce hearing the judge would give her everything.
__________________
1970 C-10 LWB "Blu" Instagram (current build pictures) 70_nc_c10 |
|
08-26-2017, 09:46 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newport, North Carolina
Posts: 638
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
I put American Racing long tube headers on my bone stock (at the time) '00 SS Camaro and had it dynod before and after and saw a 17 hp gain. Headers will definitely make a difference.
|
08-26-2017, 06:05 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,228
|
Re: Are long tube headers on a bone stock 5.3 a waste?
leave the cold air intake to the kids in hondas. normally what happens is just the opposite of what it's sold as, the IAT's (intake air temperatures) actually go UP with the biggest majority of CAI's sold. cam & headers with the proper tune will definitely wake up a bone stock engine.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|