1969 Short Wide - Page 4 - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

*highperf4x4* · 12-01-2009, 01:12 AM

yessir, I understand.

my67chevytruck · 12-01-2009, 08:37 AM

decisions, decisions, decisions...

mcbassin · 12-01-2009, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my67chevytruck

decisions, decisions, decisions...

I decided to keep it. I talked with the PO, told I had to buy another manifold probably around $100 he offered to pay for half of it I decided to keep it. So basically he gave me $50 back and I now have $300 in it. I will be looking for an intake I've seen them sell for like $20 on the bay. In any case, no harm no foul and I can start planning how to wire this crazy thing.
In the mean time the quest for 5.3-6.0 4l60e continues.
Mike

0331grunt · 12-01-2009, 01:30 PM

just run the 4.8 and put this on it..(http://www.summitracing.com/parts/TFS-K26007/)...

or not

brian69longbed · 12-01-2009, 03:35 PM

i VERY much agree^^^ ha ha

JohnC · 12-01-2009, 03:51 PM

Sorry man that it didn't work out, but did work out at the same time.

I think you will be happy with the 4.8, well at least until you find a 6.0

1LoC10 · 12-01-2009, 10:22 AM

Looks like a nice project.......... im on a little laptop, but to me that Camaro in the back looks like a 67, not a 68

mcbassin · 12-01-2009, 10:35 AM

You may be right, I have a 67 and a 68 I may be getting them mixed up? But, I think I ran the numbers on this one I thought it was a 68 RS? I don't know, it needs a lot of TLC though. It is next on the to do list. I will try to get some better pics of both maybe you can tell me what they are just by looking at them.

Mike

*highperf4x4* · 12-02-2009, 10:24 PM

I can't tell but what are you "not" planning on replacing?

mcbassin · 12-02-2009, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by highperf4x4

I can't tell but what are you "not" planning on replacing?

Not replacing the Control arms and cross bars that ties them together. Basically, spindles, rotors, calipers, balljoints, tie rods, lines, everything else required. Pass. side lower control arm is bent too. I just don't want to plan on buying all this and find out they won't fit.

gcburdic · 12-04-2009, 09:51 AM

I'll enjoy watchin this one come together McBassin....I worked on my truck with my Dad and Brother...it was a first for me and them, but they had all the tools and mechancial knowledge...they just made me do everything!!!

.....Well worth it...Now I'm ready to do another one!!!...Good Luck and have fun!

**67cheby** · 12-04-2009, 10:51 AM

isnt there only 15 hp diff between the 4.8 and the 5.3, and the 4.8 is rated 2mpg better ?? it looks like you could make that up easily with exhaust and air filter upgrades

mcbassin · 12-04-2009, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcburdic

I'll enjoy watchin this one come together McBassin....I worked on my truck with my Dad and Brother...it was a first for me and them, but they had all the tools and mechancial knowledge...they just made me do everything!!!

.....Well worth it...Now I'm ready to do another one!!!...Good Luck and have fun!

Thanks Geoff,
Yes I have looked through your build before. Crazy how your truck was held hostage for 8 months WOW. I won't have to worry about that because we are doing all body and paint work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67cheby

isnt there only 15 hp diff between the 4.8 and the 5.3, and the 4.8 is rated 2mpg better ?? it looks like you could make that up easily with exhaust and air filter upgrades

I was thinking in 03 there was about 30HP difference, but heck, I really don't care too much about that. My thinking now is, if we can get reliable transportation with a modern drivetrain.....and looks cool too. Hopefully, keep the cost as cheap as possible too.

Mike

68 short step · 12-04-2009, 07:58 PM

how many miles are on the 4.8?

mcbassin · 12-04-2009, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68 short step

how many miles are on the 4.8?

Not a low mile motor like some of yours. This one is supposed to have around 100k miles. It looks really clean and no visible leaks. Who knows? PO thought it was a 5.3, It could be higher or lower. Does the pcm retain this info? I would be interested to know.

Mike

68 short step · 12-05-2009, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcbassin

Not a low mile motor like some of yours. This one is supposed to have around 100k miles. It looks really clean and no visible leaks. Who knows? PO thought it was a 5.3, It could be higher or lower. Does the pcm retain this info? I would be interested to know.

Mike

no the PCM doesnt tell the mi., but will tell ya the VIN #, which in turn will tell ya the engine size.. with the VIN also you can run a carfax and see when the last reportable inccodent/inspection was, and look at the mileage, to give you a approximent mileage.

my67chevytruck · 12-04-2009, 11:11 PM

mike, if that camaro is in the way let me know!

mcbassin · 12-04-2009, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my67chevytruck

mike, if that camaro is in the way let me know!

No problem Heath, I will give you a chance at it too if I decide to sell it. If I had a big enough shop I would have already started on this one too. My building isn't big enough for the boat and even one project really.

68 short step · 12-05-2009, 12:11 AM

also how did you determine it was a 4.8 instead of a 5.3?

mcbassin · 12-05-2009, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68 short step

also how did you determine it was a 4.8 instead of a 5.3?

This was the first clue:

Then verified the back of the block...sure enough 4.8. I was bummed at the time, but I've moved on and am actually looking forward to installing it....eventually. Now I know exactly the things to look for when inspecting one before buying it.
I will be back on the cab tomorrow. and start tearing the rusty front suspension.

68 short step · 12-05-2009, 10:25 AM

the 4.8 isnt anything to be ashamed of, you're gonna love it, and the power diffrence isnt gonna be a big diffrence...just switching from carbed to FI is a huge improvement....keep the progress pics coming

Rokcrln · 12-05-2009, 01:30 PM

Yeah the 4.8 will be great and 100k is just broken in. My last work truck was a 2000 w/6.0L that I beat for over 300K and all it needed was a water pump at about 220K. Then our shop bought a wimpy 089 with a 5.3L I took it for a drive because I had just bought a 20K 5.3L for my Tahoe and was worried it may not be enough power for what I wanted. Well it felt like it had more power and get up and go then my 6.0L did so I was very happy with that. Then when I opened the hood I found out it was only the 4.8L! I then took that truck and loaded a full 71 cab in the bed along with a tail gate and lift gate for a 65 burb, I then hooked my 16' steel deck car trailer up with a 70 2WD Blazer with an extra set of quarter panels on it and left for Arizona. It was the smoothest tow I have done and even took the "Grape Vine" at 65 mph the entire way with out a problem and got 14 mpg loaded.

Kevin
LFD Inc.

1LoC10 · 12-05-2009, 02:50 PM

I have a 4.8 in my crew cab with heavy chrome 20's on it.... and it gets up and moves just fine, in a little short wide it should be fine

1LoC10 · 12-05-2009, 02:58 PM

Heres my two trucks side by side...lol
if a 4.8 will move the big one, it will be a great engine in the little one..lol

mcbassin · 12-05-2009, 07:11 PM

Thanks guys for confirmation of what I already thought. I am pressing on with the 4.8. I'm sure it will have plenty of power for this rig. I am going back to work on the cab in a little while (hope to get some pics).

1loc10, you were right on the money. The pic with my son is of the 67 and the 68 is pictured below. I get them mixed up. One of these days, both of them will be back on the road.
Here is the 67:

Here is the 68:

12-01-2009, 01:12 AM	#1
highperf4x4 Account Suspended Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Oklahoma City Posts: 4,709	Re: 1969 Short Wide yessir, I understand.

12-01-2009, 08:37 AM	#2
my67chevytruck Under Construction Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Midlothian,TX (DFW) Posts: 4,555	Re: 1969 Short Wide decisions, decisions, decisions... __________________ Heath subscribe to the board here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=157669 FAQ how to's 1956 Chevy Apache 1967 C10 SWB FleetSide (under construction) 1969 K10 SWB FleetSide (Future Build) 1972 C10 SWB Stepside (Future Build) 56 chevy truck : http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2955823/1 67 truck build: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=281357/1 69 k10: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=389470

12-01-2009, 01:30 PM	#4
0331grunt Now what?? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Webbers Falls, OK Posts: 579	Re: 1969 Short Wide just run the 4.8 and put this on it..(http://www.summitracing.com/parts/TFS-K26007/)... or not __________________ 69 Long Fleet - Project 06 Ram 1ton Cummins 4x4-DD 01 Tahoe- wifes "The quality of a persons life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor." ~ Vince Lombardi "A dream doesn't become reality through magic, it takes sweat, determination and hard work." ~ Colin Powell my, um, build USMC OIF Veteran SEMPER FI!

12-01-2009, 03:35 PM	#5
brian69longbed Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: chino ca Posts: 215	Re: 1969 Short Wide i VERY much agree^^^ ha ha __________________ 69' 1/2 ton LONGBED__ _______ \|__\__ \|__(O)______(O)] My build thread: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=354115

12-01-2009, 03:51 PM	#6
JohnC Registered User Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 7,461	Re: 1969 Short Wide Sorry man that it didn't work out, but did work out at the same time. I think you will be happy with the 4.8, well at least until you find a 6.0

12-01-2009, 10:22 AM	#7
1LoC10 Insert Title Here Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dyer, Indiana Posts: 5,679	Re: 1969 Short Wide Looks like a nice project.......... im on a little laptop, but to me that Camaro in the back looks like a 67, not a 68 __________________ BOBBY _69 SWB_ 1000 pics of 67-72's>> http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-72/?start=all <<

12-01-2009, 10:35 AM	#8
mcbassin Still Learning Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Central Oklahoma Posts: 10,108	Re: 1969 Short Wide You may be right, I have a 67 and a 68 I may be getting them mixed up? But, I think I ran the numbers on this one I thought it was a 68 RS? I don't know, it needs a lot of TLC though. It is next on the to do list. I will try to get some better pics of both maybe you can tell me what they are just by looking at them. Mike __________________ Mike "69 Short Wide" My Project 86 Silverado Landen's Project Instagram: @mcbassin My Website C/10 Club Oklahoma Facebook Group

12-02-2009, 10:24 PM	#9
highperf4x4 Account Suspended Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Oklahoma City Posts: 4,709	Re: 1969 Short Wide I can't tell but what are you "not" planning on replacing?

12-04-2009, 09:51 AM	#11
gcburdic Restoration Virgin! Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Huntersville, NC Posts: 8,298	Re: 1969 Short Wide I'll enjoy watchin this one come together McBassin....I worked on my truck with my Dad and Brother...it was a first for me and them, but they had all the tools and mechancial knowledge...they just made me do everything!!!.....Well worth it...Now I'm ready to do another one!!!...Good Luck and have fun! __________________ Geoff with a G 1968 Chevy C10 SWB The Mistress 1972 Custom Deluxe C20 Suburban A Suburban Named Isabella 1966 Ford Mustang Mama's High School Graduation Present

12-04-2009, 10:51 AM	#12
67cheby 67cheby Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: siloam springs ar 72761 Posts: 17,890	Re: 1969 Short Wide isnt there only 15 hp diff between the 4.8 and the 5.3, and the 4.8 is rated 2mpg better ?? it looks like you could make that up easily with exhaust and air filter upgrades __________________ Check out Slosh Tubz, bolt-in inner fenders for frame laying C-10's Slosh Tubz Introductory Price $559 67 Cheby's Dropmember Build Thread Slosh Tubz on Facebook http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554172

12-04-2009, 07:58 PM	#14
68 short step Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: tulsa OK Posts: 3,070	Re: 1969 Short Wide how many miles are on the 4.8? Last edited by 68 short step; 12-04-2009 at 07:58 PM.

12-04-2009, 11:11 PM	#17
my67chevytruck Under Construction Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Midlothian,TX (DFW) Posts: 4,555	Re: 1969 Short Wide mike, if that camaro is in the way let me know! __________________ Heath subscribe to the board here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=157669 FAQ how to's 1956 Chevy Apache 1967 C10 SWB FleetSide (under construction) 1969 K10 SWB FleetSide (Future Build) 1972 C10 SWB Stepside (Future Build) 56 chevy truck : http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2955823/1 67 truck build: http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=281357/1 69 k10: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=389470

12-05-2009, 12:11 AM	#19
68 short step Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: tulsa OK Posts: 3,070	Re: 1969 Short Wide also how did you determine it was a 4.8 instead of a 5.3?

12-05-2009, 10:25 AM	#21
68 short step Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: tulsa OK Posts: 3,070	Re: 1969 Short Wide the 4.8 isnt anything to be ashamed of, you're gonna love it, and the power diffrence isnt gonna be a big diffrence...just switching from carbed to FI is a huge improvement....keep the progress pics coming

12-05-2009, 01:30 PM	#22
Rokcrln Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Winters Ca. 95694 Posts: 4,843	Re: 1969 Short Wide Yeah the 4.8 will be great and 100k is just broken in. My last work truck was a 2000 w/6.0L that I beat for over 300K and all it needed was a water pump at about 220K. Then our shop bought a wimpy 089 with a 5.3L I took it for a drive because I had just bought a 20K 5.3L for my Tahoe and was worried it may not be enough power for what I wanted. Well it felt like it had more power and get up and go then my 6.0L did so I was very happy with that. Then when I opened the hood I found out it was only the 4.8L! I then took that truck and loaded a full 71 cab in the bed along with a tail gate and lift gate for a 65 burb, I then hooked my 16' steel deck car trailer up with a 70 2WD Blazer with an extra set of quarter panels on it and left for Arizona. It was the smoothest tow I have done and even took the "Grape Vine" at 65 mph the entire way with out a problem and got 14 mpg loaded. Kevin LFD Inc.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

12-05-2009, 02:50 PM	#23
1LoC10 Insert Title Here Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dyer, Indiana Posts: 5,679	Re: 1969 Short Wide I have a 4.8 in my crew cab with heavy chrome 20's on it.... and it gets up and moves just fine, in a little short wide it should be fine __________________ BOBBY _69 SWB_ 1000 pics of 67-72's>> http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-72/?start=all <<

12-05-2009, 02:58 PM	#24
1LoC10 Insert Title Here Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dyer, Indiana Posts: 5,679	Re: 1969 Short Wide Heres my two trucks side by side...lol if a 4.8 will move the big one, it will be a great engine in the little one..lol __________________ BOBBY _69 SWB_ 1000 pics of 67-72's>> http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z...-72/?start=all <<

12-05-2009, 07:11 PM	#25
mcbassin Still Learning Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Central Oklahoma Posts: 10,108	Re: 1969 Short Wide Thanks guys for confirmation of what I already thought. I am pressing on with the 4.8. I'm sure it will have plenty of power for this rig. I am going back to work on the cab in a little while (hope to get some pics). 1loc10, you were right on the money. The pic with my son is of the 67 and the 68 is pictured below. I get them mixed up. One of these days, both of them will be back on the road. Here is the 67: Here is the 68: __________________ Mike "69 Short Wide" My Project 86 Silverado Landen's Project Instagram: @mcbassin My Website C/10 Club Oklahoma Facebook Group

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.