Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-31-2017, 09:53 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Coeur D Alene
Posts: 2
|
7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
This is my first time posting on here so I apologize if this thread is in the wrong place or anything, but I'll get right to it I suppose, I have a 69 k20 that I've been planning on doing a diesel swap in for quite a while now, but I'm really stuck on which engine to choose as the title indicates I'm thinking about a 7.3 or a 12 valve Cummins, I'd prefer the 7.3 but it seems to have been pretty well avoided for swaps in these trucks and I'm really wondering if anyone knows why or has attempted this swap and could share some information as to whether it's worth it or if the Cummins is the best way to go between the two, thanks in advance!
|
06-05-2017, 08:45 PM | #2 |
6>8 Plugless........
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Prairie City, Ia
Posts: 17,139
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
What year 7.3 are you wanting? A powerstroke or an older IDI? The main reason everyone chooses a 12 valve is for several reasons. Very reliable, easy to fit into a variety of vehicles, cheaper to mod, and great fuel mileage. You can do a 7.3 but dollar for dollar a 12 valve will be the more economical choice.
__________________
Ryan 1972 Chevy Longhorn K30 Cheyenne Super, 359 Inline 6 cylinder, Auto Trans, Tilt, Diesel Tach/Vach, Buckets, Rare Rear 4-link and air ride option Build Thread 1972 GMC Sierra Grande Longhorn 4x4 1972 Chevy Cheyenne Super K20 Long Step side tilt, tach, tow hooks, AC, 350 4 speed 1972 C10 Suburban Custom Deluxe 1969 Chevy milk truck 1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR STG3 Cam Super T10 1940 Ford 354 Hemi 46RH Ford 9" on air ride huge project Tired of spark plugs? Check this out. |
06-05-2017, 09:17 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Coeur D Alene
Posts: 2
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
I'd like to do a powerstroke, I know that 12 valves are pretty much the best for making big power and getting the best mpg, I'd just like something a little different and my goal isn't really to get crazy power and I only get about 3 mpg with is as is so either will get me a pretty decent increase, my main concern really is how much work will need to be done to the firewall to make a powerstroke fit without a body lift
|
06-05-2017, 09:39 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chatt Tn
Posts: 977
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
powerstroke are not that fun to work on, have crazy oil fired injectors, and are very temperamental about what oil is run in them. they don't sound good either. but its your truck, do what makes you happy. It won't be anymore difficult than any other swap, other than nobody makes swap parts so you'll have to fab it all yourself.
__________________
88 military v30 crewcab shortbed 5.9 cummins, nv4500, 205 86 k30, 89 diesel burb, 76 gmc pathfinder 71 longbed 5.3 4l80 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=522535 |
06-05-2017, 09:44 PM | #5 |
6>8 Plugless........
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Prairie City, Ia
Posts: 17,139
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
I put a 6.9 in my 76 many years ago. The truck had a body lift already so that helped with the fit. There is a guy in NW Iowa that put a 7.3 PSD in a 83 or so K20. It looked like he didn't modify the fire wall but he could have. Buy a complete truck to strip everything out of. If you don't it will get expensive. I swapped a couple of F350s from gas or IDI to a powerstroke. It was a lot of work for that little PSD noise.
__________________
Ryan 1972 Chevy Longhorn K30 Cheyenne Super, 359 Inline 6 cylinder, Auto Trans, Tilt, Diesel Tach/Vach, Buckets, Rare Rear 4-link and air ride option Build Thread 1972 GMC Sierra Grande Longhorn 4x4 1972 Chevy Cheyenne Super K20 Long Step side tilt, tach, tow hooks, AC, 350 4 speed 1972 C10 Suburban Custom Deluxe 1969 Chevy milk truck 1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR STG3 Cam Super T10 1940 Ford 354 Hemi 46RH Ford 9" on air ride huge project Tired of spark plugs? Check this out. |
06-26-2017, 11:34 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mountain House, CA
Posts: 555
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
If you do a 95 to 97 powerstoke it is more "self Contained" in that it does not need an external fuel pump of a charge air cooler. They are super reliable and are capable of a lot of easy power with a tune. I had a 12 valve gmc project at one point, and in retrospect the 7.3l powerstroke would have been a cool unique set up.
__________________
My Chevy habit is paid for by Ford diesels... Here is my SLOW LS install: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...55#post6456355 Caliper Rebuild: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=613748 Upper Control Arm Bushings: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=616974 IG mattcrp1 |
Bookmarks |
|
|