Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-02-2008, 05:41 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,917
|
Re: ?? about Slam bags for my 66 short/fleet
Quote:
My 68 had the larger Stones in back w/1.5" blocks. Using the bolt in style c-notches, my rear end @ ride height was .75" into the frame which required 30psi in the bags. This was a little too soft (bouncy) for my taste. So ..... during my suspension re-vamp I switched to a smaller diameter bag which would theoretically require more air @ the same height & eliminate that 'bouncy' ride I noticed w/o adding any more height.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 01-02-2008 at 05:41 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|