The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > Info Center > Review Board > Vendor Reviews

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2021, 08:29 AM   #1
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
MOOG Disapointment

So, last fall/winter I rebuilt my entire front suspension, steering, and converted to power disc brakes on the front. Another thread on here a week or so ago got me to looking at everything and I discovered that one of the boots on my tie rods is completely split and the others are already cracked. WTH? The truck literally has maybe three miles on it since this was all installed as it is still not technically road ready, but close.

Anybody got recommendations for replacement tie rod boots? I'm a little aggravated to be going back and pulling some of this apart.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 09:02 AM   #2
weq92f
Registered User
 
weq92f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 3,157
Re: MOOG Disapointment

.

That's odd. Usually those boots are nice thick rubber and arrive in pristine condition. Maybe try contacting Moog with your complaint? They may well send you new boots free of charge to help you out!

https://www.moogparts.com/contact.html

-klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi
07 335 sport turbo 6sp
94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs
99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold
73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend
68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold
weq92f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:01 AM   #3
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,452
Re: MOOG Disapointment

That is surprising. I have long held AC Delco and Moog as being the best GM parts out there. Manufacturers have lowered their products quality in favor of profit.
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver
primer is finer
91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:08 AM   #4
68 P.O.S.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 1,662
Re: MOOG Disapointment

I had a similar issue with Moog boots as well. I ended up getting replacement boots for the tie-rods and ball joints from Prothane.
__________________
72 C10 lwb fleetside -stock 350/350 combo
68 P.O.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:31 AM   #5
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,452
Re: MOOG Disapointment

How do the Prothane products compare to Moog? How long have you had them on?
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver
primer is finer
91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:46 AM   #6
68 P.O.S.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 1,662
Re: MOOG Disapointment

I haven't installed them yet as I'm in the middle of slowly rebuilding the front end and engine/trans, so everything is apart. The Prothane boots are all poly and seem well made. I also found good reviews for them. I test fit the ball joint boots and they fit well. The tie-rod ends I'm not sure of yet. I bought the motor/trans mounts also after having the rubber ones completely fail on me while driving.
__________________
72 C10 lwb fleetside -stock 350/350 combo
68 P.O.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:51 AM   #7
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68 P.O.S. View Post
I had a similar issue with Moog boots as well. I ended up getting replacement boots for the tie-rods and ball joints from Prothane.
This is what I am thinking about doing as well. I've only heard good feedback from Prothane parts and I'd prefer to only have to re-do this once.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:59 AM   #8
54blackhornet
Registered User
 
54blackhornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eastern Oregon
Posts: 2,384
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Poor rubber quality is a big problem across the entire spectrum of the classic car industry.
__________________
71 C-20
07 Magnum RT AWD
54blackhornet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 01:43 PM   #9
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Were the parts from the 'Problem Solver' line or their standard replacement stuff? There's a difference in warranty between the 2 so if they're the Problem Solver line it's worth inquiring.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 02:08 PM   #10
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Were the parts from the 'Problem Solver' line or their standard replacement stuff? There's a difference in warranty between the 2 so if they're the Problem Solver line it's worth inquiring.
I honestly do not remember but will go back through my records to see. Digging back through my photos I am not thinking the install was about September last year.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 02:28 PM   #11
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67C10Step View Post
I honestly do not remember but will go back through my records to see. Digging back through my photos I am not thinking the install was about September last year.
The standard series parts have a limited warranty & I believe they have an 'R/K' in the part number description where the 'Problem Solver' line has that in the part ID/descriptions.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 02:32 PM   #12
68 P.O.S.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 1,662
Re: MOOG Disapointment

My boot issues were from the Problem Solver line.
__________________
72 C10 lwb fleetside -stock 350/350 combo
68 P.O.S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 02:35 PM   #13
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68 P.O.S. View Post
My boot issues were from the Problem Solver line.
Did you reach out about the issue?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 02:45 PM   #14
69Tom
Registered User
 
69Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,335
Re: MOOG Disapointment

This is disturbing to hear. I too am going to be pissed if I have to pull my front end apart.
69Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 03:04 PM   #15
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
The standard series parts have a limited warranty & I believe they have an 'R/K' in the part number description where the 'Problem Solver' line has that in the part ID/descriptions.
Went and checked my records. Mine were the Problem Solver series of parts. I will take some photos and send them to MOOG just to see what response I get.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 03:35 PM   #16
Grumpy old man
Senior Member
 
Grumpy old man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Gods country East,Tn
Posts: 8,545
Re: MOOG Disapointment

This might help . I'll have to check mine also .

https://www.moogparts.com/parts/susp...SAAEgK0KvD_BwE
__________________

1967 Factory short bed - Old school
'71 - 350 / 4bolt / 487 heads / Edelbrock C3BX
Muncie M-22 4 speed / Hurst Comp plus
Factory 12 bolt posi 3.73 / 255-70-15
Smoothed firewall / Factory cowl induction
Power disc brakes / power steering / 3.5-5" drop
Grumpy old man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 03:40 PM   #17
52napco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 2,095
Re: MOOG Disapointment

The problem is MADE IN CHINA...you are paying for the name
52napco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 04:11 PM   #18
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,471
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 52napco View Post
The problem is MADE IN CHINA...you are paying for the name
Not to be obtuse but these are the sort of comments online that drive me nuts. Can you provide some alternatives to Moog that you have used and would recommend? This is, for the most part, a helpful community of people with a common interest. I’ve gotten a lot of help on this board and this thread should be helpful to some as that is the reason I started it.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 04:52 PM   #19
72c20customcamper
Registered User
 
72c20customcamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,637
Re: MOOG Disapointment

I've been disappointed with pretty much all of them . My case was on my 3500 CTD replaced the front ball joints with moogs . Shot in less than 25k miles replaced with Dynatracs expensive yes but they have 50k on them now with no sign of play .

I know it's not representative of our chevys but it says volumes of the quality of replacement parts.
__________________
Mark
72 c20 custom camper Husky edition,
66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark
1969 AMX ,
1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20
1977 Suburban sold
68 anniversary.
72c20customcamper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 06:25 PM   #20
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67C10Step View Post
Not to be obtuse but these are the sort of comments online that drive me nuts. Can you provide some alternatives to Moog that you have used and would recommend? This is, for the most part, a helpful community of people with a common interest. I’ve gotten a lot of help on this board and this thread should be helpful to some as that is the reason I started it.
x2
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2021, 10:54 PM   #21
jimijam00
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 553
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Buy the GM stuff...I *think* it is still made in Mexico. Because we all know that the Made in Mexico label means quality.

Seriously, aftermarket parts ARE a crap shoot. I've used moog problem solvers on at least 6 vehicles w/o one problem. I know many that have used them also and never a problem. It's a crap shoot, man.
jimijam00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2021, 06:45 AM   #22
Barnfind46
Registered User
 
Barnfind46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Mena,Arkansas
Posts: 485
Re: MOOG Disapointment

My NAPA guy said Moog was sold and is made overseas now. Not sure this is true though. Getting hard to get quality parts these days. The last two times I had my truck leave me stranded was because of new replacement parts. Both were ignition parts but I am currently building a new rolling chassis and I will be upset if I have to break it all down again because of a split boot.
__________________
68' with no bells or whistles unless I add'em.
Barnfind46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2021, 09:33 AM   #23
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
Re: MOOG Disapointment

No disrespect to the guys that are upset but we're talking about suspension pieces (TRE's; BJ's; Pitman; Idler). At least they're externally accessible. It's not like you'd have to disassemble the entire truck to access the part like a failed piece on a lifter inside the motor.

We all agree that one shouldn't have to worry about a boot/seal failing but it's also not the end of the world. Keep grease in it until you can service it @ your convenience. Try your luck w/the poly style boot/cover. I've had those split as well (Prothane brand) so no guarantees there.

I'll take a failed cover seal & a still working/functioning pivot joint vs an intact seal & a failed joint.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2021, 09:41 AM   #24
StingRay
Senior Member
 
StingRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Saskatoon,SK,Canada
Posts: 2,476
Re: MOOG Disapointment

I had the same thing happen to me with Moog parts 25 years ago. It's certainly not new. I reached out to Moog and they sent a box with half a dozen in it. Within 3 years I'd emptied the box and ended up buying some urethane ones. Moog could source better boots but don't. Pretty sad really.
__________________
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Canada
StingRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2021, 09:44 AM   #25
72c20customcamper
Registered User
 
72c20customcamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,637
Re: MOOG Disapointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
No disrespect to the guys that are upset but we're talking about suspension pieces (TRE's; BJ's; Pitman; Idler). At least they're externally accessible. It's not like you'd have to disassemble the entire truck to access the part like a failed piece on a lifter inside the motor.

We all agree that one shouldn't have to worry about a boot/seal failing but it's also not the end of the world. Keep grease in it until you can service it @ your convenience. Try your luck w/the poly style boot/cover. I've had those split as well (Prothane brand) so no guarantees there.

I'll take a failed cover seal & a still working/functioning pivot joint vs an intact seal & a failed joint.
Well if they were a few years old on a vehicle being used I would get your point but the op stated the truck isnt on the road and maybe has three miles on it. Almost like taking it out of the box and its cracked not acceptable
__________________
Mark
72 c20 custom camper Husky edition,
66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark
1969 AMX ,
1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20
1977 Suburban sold
68 anniversary.
72c20customcamper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com