![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Delta, British Columbia
Posts: 1,344
|
Any problems/thoughts with this setup?
I purchased a 72 2wd blazer with no motor and tranny. I think it has a 3:08 rear end. I am looking at putting in a 3.8l V6 out of a 1995 and up camaro. I found a 700r4 for sale (guy said it was rebuilt with second stage shift kit installed) as well. I want gas mileage not huge horsepower. Already have a big block for that. Any ideas or problems or thoughts on this setup?
![]()
__________________
1992 Gmc 2wd 1972 Chevy Blazer 2wd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Watch out for your cornhole !
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
|
That should be a real neat truck as long as you keep the EFI on the engine.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sahuarita, AZ USA
Posts: 2,033
|
You may be ok with it, underpowered for sure, but I doubt you could tow anything with it.
__________________
Bill - Tucson, AZ 47 Chevrolet 2 dr sedan 56 Chevrolet 210 2 dr sedan 66 Chevrolet Malibu 2 dr 4 speed 71 Chevrolet C30 Longhorn 86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS (Sold) 01 Chevrolet Tahoe IM - BUSTERWIVE@aol.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 658
|
I would probably go with a newer all aluminum 5.3 fuel injected small block. I believe there is a thread about someone installing one. Light weight, won't work hard to move the truck so it should be fairly fuel efficient. The truck would also be worth more. Just my 2cents worth.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
laying low
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,271
|
Also how do you intend to use this truck? A daily driver that sees no highway miles, will it have a lift kit and 35" tires? That 3:08 gear and OD trans behind a 6 might work together ok with shorter tires. As far as mileage is concerned you could do as well with a small V8 and have better resale value. IMO
__________________
Boog 69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver primer is finer 91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said. I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
PROJECT 7DEUCE
![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,608
|
Hey boog its a 2wd kinda doubt it wil have big tires on it.. Sounds like it maybe a little under powered.. Anyone know the weight of a s-10 style blazer verese our full size blazer's..
__________________
GO BIG GREEN ![]() MEMBER #6377 72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free. Project "7DEUCE" check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665 Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
laying low
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,271
|
Whoooooops! My bad. I'd still go for the V8 though.
__________________
Boog 69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver primer is finer 91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said. I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Special Order
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,859
|
If using the V6,I`d go to 3.73 ratio.Should move you fine.Don`t know weight difference from S/10,nor hp difference from 250 I6.The 250 rolls a short 1/2t down the road just fine.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Delta, British Columbia
Posts: 1,344
|
Actually the 3.8 would be out of a 95 and up camaro (I read that the V6 puts out 200hp stock). I can't imagine those being much lighter than a blazer. As for wheels, it wouldn't be anything big, probably some 15's. It is to be a daily driver.
__________________
1992 Gmc 2wd 1972 Chevy Blazer 2wd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|