The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2016, 08:06 AM   #1
bigmac73
Senior Member
 
bigmac73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chesapeake, Va
Posts: 1,275
brake argument at work

Guys,
I am in a conversation with a co worker about putting rear disc brakes on my truck, I already have Disc on the front, so if I put a aftermarket set on the back.
Do I need to replace the front set up with a aftermarket set as well?

so right now single piston stock caliper on the front and maybe a 2 piston caliper on the back or go with the Capitan fab brackets and use the GM factory style calipers D52 on the back

will it really make a difference if I do not match the front and rear
__________________
Mike
72 C-10 Cheyenne off frame resto and Upgraded to 4 wheel disk, Tilt, Dakota Digital Dash / Rear slider.
421 SBC / TH350 3000RPM Stall
Progression Ignition /Holley 750 DP/3:73 gear Eaton Limited Slip unit / 2 1/2 exhaust glasspacks
bigmac73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2016, 08:25 AM   #2
chiefcfd
Senior Member
 
chiefcfd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cadiz, Ky
Posts: 512
Re: brake argument at work

No it doesn't have to be matched. The master cylinder and proportioning valve separate the two systems. Lots of people have used Caprice, Impala and Cadillac rear disc setups on these trucks. Do a search on rear disc conversions. There are numerous write-ups on this.
__________________
1972 Chevy LWB Roadster
1999 Chevy Silverado 2wd
2015 Chevy High Country 4x4 Crew Cab
chiefcfd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2016, 12:33 PM   #3
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: brake argument at work

All that really matters is that your master cylinder is appropriate for discs (has enough reservoir size and swept volume, since discs take more) and that the bore sizes are matched.

If you took rear discs intended for a 7/8" master and ran them with a 1 1/16" master, you'd have a hard pedal and the fronts would over-assist, and vice versa.

But there's nothing magic about aftermarket.

All that said I'd personally leave it alone unless it's for looks behind fancy wheels or something. Drums are just fine for trucks in the rear, IMHO, unless you're maybe doing extensive mountain towing. They don't stop any faster, really, just more resistant to heat fade and maybe water.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 08:38 AM   #4
snipescastle2
Registered User
 
snipescastle2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WARRENSBURG,MISSOURI,64093
Posts: 1,518
Talking Re: brake argument at work

I'm running the rear disc setup from "CaptFab" it uses late model Camaro/Firebird rear calipers (1993-1997 models) and Caprice SS rotors.
I am running the factory disc/drum master cylinder with the CPP Disc/Disc pro portioning valve, stops really well, the only thing I did different, was to install an electric vacuum pump for my power booster. I have a pretty big,lumpy cam in my 383 stroker, and it only makes 11 inches of vacuum at idle, and I wanted to make sure this thing stops. It works rather well, makes 25 inches of vacuum with no sweat...got it off an Audi A4 at the local pick n pull for $20.00

CaptFab's kit is top notch! You can get it plain or powder coated, your choice, and it comes with great instructions and all hardware! When you go after your brake calipers, make sure you get "pre-"LS1" calipers, reason being, in 1998, when GM started putting LS engines in the Camaro/ firebirds, they changed the e brake setup to an integral drum brake shoe set inside the brake rotors, you want the '93 to '97 with the external e brake cables. The one thing that needs to be re-arranged is, the shortened e brake cable (non-400TH) if you move the cables towards the inside of the rear cross member (holes on either side of the driveshaft loop) that will make it easier to attach the cables to your brake pedal cable with out making extensions.
HTH,
Ben

Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
"Persistence is the twin sister of Excellence.one is a matter of quality,the other, a matter of time"
“Serious Black” my 1971 Short Bed Fleetside Sold to
an outstanding man in Lees Summit,Mo. “Gone, but by no means,Forgotten”

Last edited by snipescastle2; 09-01-2016 at 08:40 AM. Reason: Changes
snipescastle2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 09:39 AM   #5
ryanv70c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: San Mateo
Posts: 199
Re: brake argument at work

It takes a lot of the guess work and tweaking out of the equation if you have a matched set of brakes. I put front and rear brakes from a 98-02 Camaro on to my 63 Nova and it was the best stopping classic car I had ever driven. Incredibly balanced and it wanted to put you through the windshield and never locked up a single time.

I used a 68 vette' manual disc disc master
ryanv70c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 10:11 AM   #6
leftybass209
Registered User
 
leftybass209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,186
Re: brake argument at work

In theory I understand the argument; you don't want your total piston surface area in the rear, to be larger than the front. Pad size isn't relevant in this instance. The larger the piston, the larger the output pressure when you step on the brakes. It would make brake bias hell, even with an adjustable prop valve.

It's easy for the factory to match brakes because they have the engineering info, but that stuff doesn't always trickle down accurately. Ideally, don't increase the amount of pistons on the Rear calipers and you'll be fine.

Last edited by leftybass209; 09-01-2016 at 10:17 AM.
leftybass209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 02:00 PM   #7
snipescastle2
Registered User
 
snipescastle2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WARRENSBURG,MISSOURI,64093
Posts: 1,518
Talking Re: brake argument at work

I just wanted to share the piston size of a Camaro/Firebird rear caliper just for comparison. Now, this isn't the actual bore size, but it will at least give perspective to size. It's close, but the bore is bigger.my rear brake line from the master cylinder to the rear axle "T" distribution fitting is 1/4" then the tubing to the calipers is 3/16"

I'm running the factory disc/drum master cylinder, delco/moraine
booster, and CPP disc/disc prop valve,
mine stops very well, no issues.

Here's the picture of the caliper. Take in
mind,bruise is an "LS1" rear caliper, hence, no E brake lever.
Have a good one!
Ben

Posted via Mobile Device
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Persistence is the twin sister of Excellence.one is a matter of quality,the other, a matter of time"
“Serious Black” my 1971 Short Bed Fleetside Sold to
an outstanding man in Lees Summit,Mo. “Gone, but by no means,Forgotten”
snipescastle2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 02:02 PM   #8
snipescastle2
Registered User
 
snipescastle2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WARRENSBURG,MISSOURI,64093
Posts: 1,518
Talking Re: brake argument at work

Sorry, don't know how my picture came out upside down...
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
"Persistence is the twin sister of Excellence.one is a matter of quality,the other, a matter of time"
“Serious Black” my 1971 Short Bed Fleetside Sold to
an outstanding man in Lees Summit,Mo. “Gone, but by no means,Forgotten”
snipescastle2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com