The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2012, 10:48 PM   #1
Number21
Registered User
 
Number21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 611
Getting rid of the PCV line?

My truck has this hose from the valve cover to the carb, the PCV I think? I'm trying to clean up my engine and I want to get rid of that hose. Can I put a breather cap on that valve cover, or do I need to get new ones with different holes? I have a breather on the other side, I see a lot of engines with one on each side....
Attached Images
 
__________________
'73 K20 Cheyenne Super Camper Special 350/TH350/NP205 sittin' on 33's.

You can set my truck on fire and roll it down a hill,
and I still wouldn't trade it for a Coupe de Ville.
Number21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2012, 11:13 PM   #2
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Keep it. Helps evac gasses inside crankcase and prevents high pressure buildup
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2012, 11:29 PM   #3
Zane M
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 706
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Keep it. It does far more good than harm.

And for the sake of conversation, if you were to replace it with a breather, you really wouldn't be cleaning up the engine compartment as you will end up with oily residue on your valve covers.
Zane M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2012, 11:37 PM   #4
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,689
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

I agree with both above. Keep it. Keeping a vacuum in the crankcase is a good thing.
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2012, 11:47 PM   #5
Number21
Registered User
 
Number21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 611
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Hmmm...I guess I could get a stainless line or something. I'm thinking about getting new valve covers though, would covers like this have the correct hole for the PCV line?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/350555609822

Looks like holes for two breathers to me.
__________________
'73 K20 Cheyenne Super Camper Special 350/TH350/NP205 sittin' on 33's.

You can set my truck on fire and roll it down a hill,
and I still wouldn't trade it for a Coupe de Ville.
Number21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:58 AM   #6
butch86
Registered User
 
butch86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: harrisville, ms
Posts: 377
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

you put a bung in the hole and install a pc valve in it and run your hose.
__________________
most people sleep peacfully at night because, rough men stand ready to do violenceon there behalf.
butch86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 01:30 PM   #7
wilkin250r
Registered User
 
wilkin250r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

You want to have your PCV connected to manifold vacuum, but you might have some options. I have seen some engines that use a short hose routed to a vacuum port BEHIND the carburetor rather than in front of it. I've even seen some that don't even come off the top of the valve cover at all, but instead come from the very back, right next to the firewall, so at first glance it looks like there is no PCV at all. It really makes for a nice, clean setup. Add some good wire looms to organize the spark plug wires and you got a nice looking engine compartment.

A quick google search for PCV valves will give you good information on WHY you need that guy connected to manifold vacuum.
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!!
wilkin250r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 01:43 PM   #8
frog210
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 784
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Mine goes to my air filter?
is that wrong?
frog210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 02:04 PM   #9
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by frog210 View Post
Mine goes to my air filter?
is that wrong?
I belive earlier cars did this too. But they were simply trying to keep crankcase gases venting to the atmosphere to keep the self righteous EPA happy
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 02:26 AM   #10
1977K10
Registered User
 
1977K10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 109
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Don't feel bad of the right side of my block, it goes to a short hose into the air cleaner as well, and that has filled my air cleanr with some oil and alot of residue as well.
1977K10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 02:12 PM   #11
frog210
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 784
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

But it looks like a previous owner did it
cus my elderbrock air breather looks pretty new
It looks like the po did it it looks like it was drilled
should i move it to the carb?
frog210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 03:38 PM   #12
Firebirdjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Number21,,,,,First,,,,I'd flip the valve covers from side to side. PCV should be in the front driver side valve cover,,,not the rear passenger side.

PCV's are more effective at removing crank case pressures from the driver side due to the counter clockwise rotation of the crank shaft.

That's one reason why your PCV is soaked with oil back there. As you accelerate, any oil in the cylinder heads runs to the back, and is then sucked up through the PCV, which is coating the inside of the intake manifold, backs of the intake valves and the tops of your pistons,,,,Eeeeewwww
You may find that flipping the covers and putting the PCV where it's supposed to be will cut down on your oil consumption too,,,just a heads up


Frog,,,,,On the PCV going to the air filter,,,,that's incorrect. That hose going to the air filter is supposed to be your fresh air for the crank case,,hence the reason it's in the air filter with a small filter inside the air cleaner housing attached to the hose. This setup goes directly into a baffled hole in the valve cover (no PCV valve). this setup should be on the passenger side.
The PCV should be on the driver side cover and needs to be connected directly to intake manifold vacuum to draw out the crank case pressure,,,,hence the term Positive Crankcase Ventalation,,,or PCV
As your PCV is sucking out crank case vapors from the driver side,,,,fresh air is replenished on the passenger side through that air cleaner connection you speak of.
Firebirdjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 03:54 PM   #13
frog210
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 784
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

I dont mean to highjack his thread
but this is how mine is
pics


as you can see on the drivers side theres a hose that goes to the carb

and i have a hose like he does in the pic on the passenger side but that goes to my air cleaner

and my air cleaner dosent have have s small air filter attached to the hose
frog210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 04:18 PM   #14
Firebirdjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Your PCV is hooked up correctly.

The hose on the passenger side that goes to your air cleaner (which isn't in the picture) Normally has a small fiber filter on the end with a factory air cleaner.

I'm betting you are running an aftermarket air cleaner (open element) in which case the hose from the valve cover actually connects INSIDE of the air filter element somewhere on the bottom of the base,,,therefore it doesn't need the little fiber filter on the end. On a factory air cleaner that hose would connect to the housing OUTSIDE of the filter element, hence the reason for the little fiber filter.

Hope that makes sense
Firebirdjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 04:23 PM   #15
wilkin250r
Registered User
 
wilkin250r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Frog, your setup is fine. The PCV is on the driver side, and it's correctly attached to a vacuum port on the carb. That vacuum is pulling air and vapors OUT of your crankcase, exactly as it's supposed to.

The hose on your passenger side is basically a vent, and it should NOT be attached to vacuum. When the PCV on the driver's side is pulling air out, the vent on the passenger side allows fresh air in. And it's attached to your air cleaner because you want any air coming in to be filtered, you don't want to be sucking dirt and dust into your crankcase.

Your setup is just fine.
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!!
wilkin250r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:46 PM   #16
hopelessredneck
Registered User
 
hopelessredneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 147
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

i use a breather cap with a filer on it i got from proform
Attached Images
 
__________________
1978 GMC C25 LWB
hopelessredneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:59 PM   #17
bmfpeterson
Registered User
 
bmfpeterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 538
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

This is what I did, I wanted to run a clean setup as well. I wont get into all of everyone's ideas on running it or not...... I just made a tube that connected both sides and put a filter on it
Attached Images
 
bmfpeterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:33 PM   #18
Firebirdjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmfpeterson View Post
This is what I did, I wanted to run a clean setup as well. I wont get into all of everyone's ideas on running it or not...... I just made a tube that connected both sides and put a filter on it
Yep that works too. You don't HAVE to use a PCV. PCV is just an emissions device so you aren't venting your crank case vapors to atmosphere,,,,nothing more.

A couple breathers does the trick so long as your area doesn't do a visual inspection and the tree huggers complain Actually PCV's weren't even phased in on GM cars until 1969. Before that it was nothing but dump tubes and breathers.

The only time you have a mess with open breathers is if you have a ring control problem in one or more of your cylinders.

In all honesty open breathers are a better way to go as far as performance is concerned. Venting crank case vapors back to the intake track through a PCV dilutes the air/fuel charge, in more extreme cases it can cause pinging and poor performance.
Firebirdjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:59 PM   #19
Number21
Registered User
 
Number21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 611
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

What I'd really like is one of these on both sides:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CHROME-ROUND...e56845&vxp=mtr

Right now I have something like that on the driver side, but it also connects to the air filter and it's a PITA. Is that really so bad? I can deal with a little oil mist on the valve covers.

I could definately use that extra vacuum port where the PCV plugs in too.
__________________
'73 K20 Cheyenne Super Camper Special 350/TH350/NP205 sittin' on 33's.

You can set my truck on fire and roll it down a hill,
and I still wouldn't trade it for a Coupe de Ville.
Number21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:32 PM   #20
Firebirdjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number21 View Post
What I'd really like is one of these on both sides:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CHROME-ROUND...e56845&vxp=mtr

Right now I have something like that on the driver side, but it also connects to the air filter and it's a PITA. Is that really so bad? I can deal with a little oil mist on the valve covers.

I could definately use that extra vacuum port where the PCV plugs in too.
Yes you can run breathers on both sides if you wish, it serves the same purpose, you are just venting to atmosphere instead of introducing it back into your intake track.

It's basically the same thing Bmfperterson is doing that he linked a picture to. He just connected both sides with a breather. Those are also made with dual breathers. You see alot of that setup on roundy round cars and sprint cars....
Firebirdjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 01:04 AM   #21
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,689
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebirdjones View Post
PCV is just an emissions device so you aren't venting your crank case vapors to atmosphere,,,,nothing more.
No it is not. What deth_1970 said is correct. The PCV keeps a vacuum on the crankcase to keep vapors from building pressure. That is why it is called POSITIVE crankcase ventilation and not just crankcase ventilation. Those old tubes were not "dump tubes", they were downdraft which drew a vacuum on the crankcase and they were not emissions devices at all. That is what PCV replaced because it was a way of achieving the same goal as the downdraft by ventilating the crankcase and also being better for the environment.
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 03:22 AM   #22
Number21
Registered User
 
Number21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 611
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corts60 View Post
The PCV keeps a vacuum on the crankcase to keep vapors from building pressure.
Ok, can somebody explain to me why that is needed and what good it does? I don't doubt what you're saying, even an old Briggs and Stratton engine has a PCV setup. That said, I've also seen lots of engines without them....
__________________
'73 K20 Cheyenne Super Camper Special 350/TH350/NP205 sittin' on 33's.

You can set my truck on fire and roll it down a hill,
and I still wouldn't trade it for a Coupe de Ville.
Number21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:37 PM   #23
Firebirdjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corts60 View Post
No it is not. What deth_1970 said is correct. The PCV keeps a vacuum on the crankcase to keep vapors from building pressure. That is why it is called POSITIVE crankcase ventilation and not just crankcase ventilation. Those old tubes were not "dump tubes", they were downdraft which drew a vacuum on the crankcase and they were not emissions devices at all. That is what PCV replaced because it was a way of achieving the same goal as the downdraft by ventilating the crankcase and also being better for the environment.
You are taking what I said out of context. In one sentence you say it's not an emissions device, in another sentence you say they were better for the environment.

I had also mentioned vacuum and positive crank case evac in another post earlier. Put it all together and I think you know exactly what I was trying to explain before
Firebirdjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:59 PM   #24
butch86
Registered User
 
butch86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: harrisville, ms
Posts: 377
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

i use these myself they cost a lil more but you get better ventalation than the 4 dollar ones at your LPS.

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Push-I...r-Kit,626.html
__________________
most people sleep peacfully at night because, rough men stand ready to do violenceon there behalf.
butch86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:43 PM   #25
deth_1970
Registered User
 
deth_1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Braggs, okla
Posts: 161
Re: Getting rid of the PCV line?

one thing about disconnecting the pvc is that having it hooked up creates a vacuum in the block, which helps the rings stay seated, it is an emissions thing, but also some performance to be gained, prior to the pvc what was used was a downdraft tube, that went down the back of the block to slightly below the oil pan, the tube was cut at an angle, where a where a vacuum was created by air passing by it as the vehicle gained speed,
look at some performance stuff, they have crankcase evac systems that connect to the exhaust,
I would say, clean up the install, a little braided hose, or something but personally i would leave it in,
just my 2 cents worth
__________________
78 dualy crew cab wife calls "the beast"
79 silverado "yeller"
99 tahoe
02 Gmc sierra
deth_1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com