The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2002, 12:04 AM   #1
RShaips
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Augusta Missouri
Posts: 804
67 283 PG bolt into a 65 ?

I am taking the body off of my 67 1/2 ton to put on my 72 4x4 and my friend has a 65 1/2 ton with a 6 cylinder 3 speed.My 283 with PG trans should bolt right in to his truck,using the trans crossmember and steering column.He will have access to all of my parts except the radiator and fan shroud.Tell me if I am thinking right on this. Thanks
RShaips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 02:31 PM   #2
RShaips
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Augusta Missouri
Posts: 804
ttt
RShaips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 03:14 PM   #3
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Sounds about right. You may have to give him your motor ount towers and drive shaft too...but it should all go in. I have pretty much concluded you can install anything in these trucks, and the 65 is the same as a 67 underneath the skin.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 06:31 PM   #4
RShaips
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Augusta Missouri
Posts: 804
Thanks for the info,I thought they were the same,When did they change the frame 73 ?
RShaips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2002, 08:06 PM   #5
adamls
Gotta Startem Early
 
adamls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
I do not know if this helps but I just replaced a 292??? straight six from a 65 with a 250 from a 67. the motor mounts were not the same and the motor stands off the crossmember were also not the same or in the sam location.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished
adamls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 12:57 AM   #6
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Yes, 73 is when they chainged.
The 292 and 250 had diferant mounting points. I think the 292 had staggered mounts, used a V8 and an inline mounting point if memory serves. Btu the frame rails should be the same. Just need the proper small block towers. Even big block towers would work...that's whats in the GMC with a 350 on them.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2003, 11:43 AM   #7
adamls
Gotta Startem Early
 
adamls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
That is correct. They did have staggered mounts but even the motor mount itself from the passenger side would not fit the 250. I cant believe that 2 engines so similar would be so different.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished
adamls is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com