![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Rear gear decisions..
Hey guys, I've got an 85 c10 350/th350. I am in the process of a 90s 4" spindle lift. I've decided to go with 33s. My truck came with 2.73 in the rear. I just finished rebuilding my th350 and it's time to regear. I'm torn between 3.73 and 4.10 or 4.11 or whatever it is for 12 bolt. Anybody run a similar set up and want to share opinions? I only drive 50+ very rarely and for short amounts of time. Like 30 40 min on the interstate to orlando
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
If anybody wants to know it's a mild and tired 350. K1102 cam. Performer carb and intake. Poll like 8.2 compression. Headers 2.5 in exhaust. And probably poorly tuned.
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
At the body shop.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,212
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
3:73 and 32's where decent In my 77, never tried 33's. Went back to low riders.
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer " " Dont antique the equipment " |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Happy to be here
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Quote:
With that said, I think 4.10s would be a better choice if your running 33's and a TH350.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Quote:
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,188
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Of course, gas mileage will be affected by rear end ratio. When you are up in the high 3s or 4s your mpg will suffer. My choice has always been for the low 3s, even into the 2s, but I don't care about performance. If you want performance then you need the 4s, but highway driving will be limited. My squares have all ben 3/4 tons, so mpg is lousy with any rear end.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Yeah I'm not worried bout gas mileage. I want that feel it in your balls when I punch it. But I also don't want it to be useless abovery 40mph lol. I've been driving around in 2nd gear the past couple days and it seems like it's running high rpms but I'm used to the 2.73 so I'm trying to get used to it. 2nd is 1.52 * 2.73 = 4.14 so it would be like 3rd with 4.11s. But I don't get the satisfaction of good launches so it's weird. Lol
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
With 28 (stock) tires and 2.73 is stock. So 20% bigger tires is 33. 20% lower gear to compensate is 3.27. But I want a lower than stock feel. Some came 3.08 stock. 3.08 and 20% is 3.69. With that 3.73 would be stockish feel as well. So I'm thinking 4.10. I wish I could find some 3.90 for 12 bolt. Happy medium. SO MANY NUMBERS!! lol
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,041
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
If you are changing out gears, I would go with 3.73 and 31" tires. To go 33" tires, you would really want a 4.10, and that means a new carrier as well, as has been pointed out. The BFG All Terrain TA KO2 just became available in 31x10.5R15, so you can go to the best tire out there if you are an all-terrain tire guy.
Now, if you find a 4.10 axle for decent bucks (good luck with that), then do the axle swap and go with 33s.
__________________
Rich Weyand 1978 K10 RCSB DD. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
I've run several similar combinations. If you were like me, and routinely running 70mph freeway speeds, the 3.73 would certainly be better. I think you could easily run 3.73, but since you said you're rarely ever running over 50mph, the 4.10 sounds a bit better, but not by much.
My personal opinion would be, even though the 4.10 sounds better for your usage, I'd probably still opt for the 3.73 if it made a price difference with a new carrier.
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Swaledale, IA
Posts: 485
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
I went to richmond gears site - these RPM's are at 60 mph:
- with 4.10 gears it would be 2500 RPM - with 3.73 gears it would be 2280 RPM Personally I would go with 3.73 gears. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Would there be a noticeable difference in feel between the 2?
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,951
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
I put a spreadsheet up on the service manual thread that takes all the fun out of it...
If you input your transmission ratios, axle ratios, and tire size it'll generate a table of RPMs to road speed. RPM_Gear_Axle_Transmission_TransferCase.zip This is a screen grab with the .ODS file open in Libre Office. Libre Office will open XLS files too but there are formatting issues. ![]()
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD 1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD 1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD 1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD 1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD 1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD 2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500 2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263 2009 Impala SS LS4 V8 RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful. Last edited by hatzie; 11-19-2015 at 07:16 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 707
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
I currently am running 33s with 3.73 gears in my k5 and it does great on the highway but it lacks a little down low my motor has a little bigger cam than yours but with the gearing I can hit the freeway and do 70mph without issues. With the lighter chassis of a 2wd and your cam it should do just fine 4.11 you will be wishing you had overdrive at higher speeds. I'll end up going to them in my rig but I don't drive it on the freeway everyday anymore and it's a trail rig so I need more gearing down low
__________________
<Brandon> 1974 Chevrolet K5 Blazer 350sbc/SM465/NP205, dana44 front, corp 14bolt rear with 4.10s and a powertrax locker, custom rear bumper 400sbc in the works. ![]() 1981 GMC C1500 stepside 250i6, 3spd, 12bolt with 3.08s 2.5/4drop on 15x10 with 275/50r15 81 GMC C3500 cab-chassis dually with utility bed 350sbc, Sm465, 14bolt with 4.10s nv4500 getting ready to go in 1979 Chevrolet K5 R.I.P. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=434096 1976 Chevrolet C10 R.I.P. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=434195 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 27
|
Re: Rear gear decisions..
Lol lacks a little down low with muncie. I have never hadone a 4x4 but 6 something 1st and 3.73 is 24 somethin 1st gear ratio. Mine is 6.88 total for first. Hence getting rid of 2.73s. I've been riding around in 2nd and I think 4.10 is a Lil low. I don't like the feel of 45. But the 2nd gear band might be throwing the feel off. It's a breaking band for manual 2nd right? So it would make it not coast so well
__________________
85 c10 lwb 350/th350 Randy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|