Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
08-10-2024, 12:16 PM | #1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 16
|
Should I change heads?
The truck is a 67' K20 that supposedly came with a 327 factory. However, the current block dates it most likely to a 64' Impala with a hodge lodge of years/models for parts. The heads are the pyramid onto of a rectangle, that the internet says are 9.25:1 59cc chambers and 1.72/1.50 valves.
The truck will only be used for camping and Home Depot runs... once in a blue moon to tow a 2 horse trailer. So I don't care about maximum power, but I do like tinkering and a extra power is fun to play with. So the question. I hear a lot about camel hump heads and the like and was wondering if they would be worth swapping to. Looks like they flow better, but have 62cc chambers which would lower the compression and might hurt low end torque. Other info. Quadrajet, 1968 corvette factory manifold, 2.5" single exhaust, current cam is a mystery, but thinking about a mild upgrade in the future. Last edited by Detour; 08-10-2024 at 09:58 PM. |
08-10-2024, 12:27 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,280
|
Re: Should I change heads?
I would retain what you have if the only option was the camel hump heads.
If I changed heads it would be to the Vortec heads. They have stellite valve and hardened seats plus flow a bunch better than the antique camel hump heads. The also require center bolt valve covers that don't leak and a different intake. It will increase power over what you have. I can see no reason to run the old heads unless you are restoring a truck. |
08-10-2024, 10:44 PM | #3 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 16
|
Re: Should I change heads?
I have seen good things about the Vortec heads over the years but I want to keep the old manifold style with the front oil fill tube. Opinion on that might change in the future. Thanks for the info.
|
08-11-2024, 08:41 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,707
|
Re: Should I change heads?
What’s the casting numbers on the block and heads?
And what numbers/letters are on the pad in front of the passenger side head? You need to confirm what you have first. |
08-13-2024, 09:48 AM | #5 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 16
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Attachment 2384903Here is a picture of the pad, I was not able to find reference to this casting when I looked last year. The numbers on the back of the block are 3858180
|
08-15-2024, 02:35 PM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 650
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Quote:
Those are 283 powerpack heads, small valves If it works , dont fix it. Those heads will give you low end power
__________________
'81 K20 Silverado , '99 Dodge Cummins 4x4, '05 Dodge Cummins 4x4, Pinstriping-Lettering-Specialty Painting Last edited by GSP7; 08-15-2024 at 04:18 PM. |
|
08-11-2024, 08:07 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 42
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Zero benefit to that change; keep your money.
"Camel hump" (462/487) heads were the best of their time, but even a stock Vortec flows more with a better chamber. And with any head swap, you gotta match the cam. Vortec chambers are 64cc, so you'd be losing about 1/2 point of compression...also not a good thing. A machine shop could drill, bore and ream a hole for the filler if you gotta have it. Better places to spend money - small-tube headers, mild cam swap, cheap intake, etc. Head swaps are never as easy you might think... |
08-13-2024, 04:09 PM | #8 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,947
|
Re: Should I change heads?
"S" suffix code comes back as a 1962 327 in a "full size" car with a Powerglide
But the Casting number shows a 64-67 327 with 250-300 hp Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
08-13-2024, 06:08 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,707
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Before you go buying heads you should tear the motor down to see what pistons are in it. Check how far the pistons are down in the cylinder. That info will help decide head type and head gasket thickness.
|
08-13-2024, 07:18 PM | #10 |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,738
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Camel humps are old as hell, outdated and honestly don't flow that well stock.
For the purchase price and the need to likely do work to them, you could buy some cheap aftermarket heads for barely anything more.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
08-15-2024, 01:27 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,623
|
Re: Should I change heads?
Leave the heads unless or untill you plan to upgrade the whole engine.
You'll loose mpg due to lower compression. Along with part throttle or tip in hp/tq. If you replace the heads you will likely gain less then 25hp unless. Your cam already flows enough to tax the heads, or you plan the upgrade at the same time. Last time I check Vortec heads were $700 delivered new. So You'll need a manifold, rockers, and a possibility of push rods. So depending on how you get the parts, and rebuilding. You could be $700 to $1200 deep into less then 25 hp. Well of your buying or rebuilding heads make sure you get them upgraded for high lift cams with Bee hive springs, seat mods or both. Me personally. I would build a either a 95+ Vortec or 92+ Gen 2 LT1 for ease of conversion with distributors, and carbs. My LT1 tows 5000 pounds easily, hauls 1500 pounds like it's not there, and runs 87 octane easily with 10-1 compression. |
Bookmarks |
|
|