11-21-2013, 12:23 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Taylorsville, Georgia
Posts: 482
|
Actual overdrive gain
Hey guys, any of you do an od swap? What was the actual before and after mpg gains? Put this one here to get a more accurate number,being we all have 67-72. Really asking because my turbo400 is starting to slip bad going into second. And would like t56 or 2004r,but would REALLY like to put a m20 Muncie back in it like it once had when dad had it. I understand the m20 is the wide ratio and blah blah. What was your true number gains? How long will it take for that extra cash to pay off? Lol I do have a 4.11 right now with a very happy 355. With the turbo 400 I CAN get 13-15 mpg driving back roads. With my motor, I think its impressvive. Anyone able to answer this?
|
11-21-2013, 01:41 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 367
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
I dont know how much it helps but with th350 getting about same mpg on 383. Have you looked at borg warner manual trans like t10 or super t10 they are very similar design to muncie with lower $$ gives you the manual trans you want with a wide selection of ratios. So in ideal world should work to give you all you want and keep cost low to make payoff sooner.
__________________
Project Fast 'n' Loud
72' C10 SWB Fleet, Faux Patina, 383 ci stroker The Page: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=608214 |
11-21-2013, 05:00 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 159
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
307ci with Saginaw 3-speed: 12 MPG.
307ci with T5 trans and 500 cfm Holley: 18 MPG. Completely changed the dynamic of the truck as I was able to drive it on the highway without fear of being run over and it got better mileage to boot. |
11-21-2013, 08:17 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,280
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
I don't have any numbers to give you as my trucks are still in the processes of being built one will be a small block 327[or 350]/T5 one will be a 454T400 and one will be a 454/4L60E. yep, I have lost my mind I have three builds mostly going on at the same time but I am pretty much use to it. It is gonna take a LONG time for you to recover the cost of the upgrade to the OD trans, unless 1, you just want one 2, it will help your motor live happier on the road due to deep gears or 3 you drive a bunch. you didn't say your current mileage now but I would hazard a guess in the 12 range. In a perfect world the best you could hope for from a OD trans would be like 4 or 5 mpg but that is a lot
|
11-21-2013, 08:44 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alden NY
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
A m-20 is just a 4 speed with a final drive ratio of 1:1. It isn't an overdrive so it would not offer any improvement in mileage. It would probably be cheapest to install a 200 4r or a 700 r4 auto in your truck since you are already set up for an auto.
__________________
1961 C1 Corvette 1959 El Camino 350 TPI, 9" 4 w disc 69 Blazer K5 - sold July '20 2021 Durango RT 5.7 |
11-21-2013, 08:57 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 288
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
With your 4.11 gears the Muncie is going to be the most fun, and even though the final drive is 1:1 just like the T400, you're going to get better mileage over the lossy automatic, especially when cruising without a lockup torque converter. While the 200 or 700 R4 route is a good upgrade solution, with your 4.11 gears the first gear of those autos will be useless, they were made with 3.73 or numerically lower gears in mind. The T56, while I'm unsure of the first gear ratio I think would be the best for a manual conversion, may drive the price way up for the cost of the manual conversion.
__________________
-- '67 Chevy Stepside 250 Inline 6 Megasquirt Fuel Injection T5 5 speed conversion Ferric Oxide impregnation throughout |
11-21-2013, 04:02 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,189
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
If I had to do some ballpark averaging from all the realistic numbers I've seen, including mine: 5-7 mpg's over 50 mph with carburation. Tbi could probably push that in the 7 - 10 mpg range with great tuning. Of course rear end gears and engine size and performance parts could bury those numbers on the low end.
|
11-21-2013, 04:11 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chandler AZ
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
I went from 12-13 to 15-16 when I changed from TH400 to 700R4. That is whith having to do math and add in a 10% speedo offset when going to the 700R4. The engine works a LOT less at freeway speeds. Went from 3100 RPM on the freeway to 2000 RPM or so when using the 700R4 and converter locked. With the 700R4 I get out of the hole quicker too. I have either 4.11 or 4.56 tail gears.
Just a note: TH400s used to last me 2-3 years. The built 700R4 has been in since 1997...
__________________
1970 Longhorn, Front Disc, 350/4 bolt, 882 heads, HEI, Edelbrock, 700R4, HO-52/4.11. 1996 Corvette, Collector Roadster, LT4, 396, 450RWHP, 6sp, 4.11/Dana44/posi 5 point roll bar And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. Gal 6:9 |
11-21-2013, 04:45 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Central NC
Posts: 830
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
I got 11 mpg with the original Saginaw 3 on the tree , I get 17-18 mpg with the 700r4.
How long it will take to pay for it will depend on how much you drive. 15 gal (about what you use out of a fill up) x 18 mpg = 270 miles 15 gal x 11 mpg = 165 miles 270 - 165 = 105 more miles per tank 105 / 18 mpg = 5.8 gal x $3.50 = $20.30 per tank that you save every time you have to fill up. Fill up once a week...$20.30 x 52 = $1055.60 per year savings.
__________________
1972 Cheyene C-10 "Ole Green" My Grandfathers truck (early 70's to 1983) My first vehicle (1983) Original 350 (3 rebuilds) 700R4 from Bowtie Overdrives |
11-21-2013, 05:13 PM | #10 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
350/700R/3.73.
Was previously 250/3spd man/3.73 Original set up was 11mpg no matter what. City, highway, didn't seem to care. The new set up is mostly 12-13 mpg (I have fun when I drive it.) That's mostly around town cruising, with a good bit of low speed 3rd gear driving. I get 16 on the highway. I did mine more for drivability. I've put over 35K on my set up since 2003. It's a great combo.
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! |
11-22-2013, 08:55 AM | #11 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,230
|
Re: Actual overdrive gain
Quote:
Quote:
70c10stepside - one other trans we might suggest would be the New Process A833. http://www.customclassictrucks.com/t..._transmission/ It was actually a MOPAR trans but was made available in the "squarebody" C/K/R/V versions with third gear as 1:1 and 4th gear set up as a .73 overdrive. Comes complete with a factory Hurst floor shifter. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
||
Bookmarks |
|
|