![]() |
rear end decisions
Got a 69 c10 with an original non posi rear end. Not sure how strong they are. I hear a lot of pros and cons about them. Found a 9" rear housing on CL for $50 and was wondering which housings are stronger, the 9" or the one I got in the truck now?
truck is being built for 95% track usage. |
Re: rear end decisions
Probably 90% of the guys will say go with the 9". But you will have to dump quite a bit of $$$ into that $50.00, 9" to get it narrowed, setup and under your truck.
|
Re: rear end decisions
Yeah I know it will be a pretty penny to build it up, but won't it cost about the same to do it with the rear end that's under my truck now?
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Then comes the big one. Can you do the work yourself and do it correctly or will you need to send it to a diff shop? If you can cut the ends, replace them with ford ends and new axles you can probably do the entire diff including an upgrade to an Eaton posi carrier for about $900.00. If you have to send that 12 bolt to a diff shop, the cost is going to be nearer to 1500.00 and, for that money, I would either build or buy a nine inch built to the width you need with all of the correct bracketry. It's a matter of your skills and money. mostly money.:lol: |
Re: rear end decisions
What kind of power will you be putting to the rear end? What size tire are you planning on running? There are a few guys here that are running the truck 12 bolt, with some respectable times.
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
I used the 12 bolt that was in mine. Had it narrowed and had ford Torino ends put on. Axles, bearing ends, narrowing all done was about 500.
|
Re: rear end decisions
Your gonna need one serious rear for 1500 pounds of torque. Forget about anything stock and go straight to Mark Williams site and break out the mastercard. Nothin in the stock world is going to tolerate that. I have a 9" with as Strange Pro spool and gear and aluminum centersection under a 2600 pound chassis and 797HP and IMO it's is not far from it's limits.
Williams site has some great info on what you need to keep it safe at various ET's, power and weight. |
Re: rear end decisions
I agree with Marv D
With those kind of power numbers, a 9" isn't goint to cut it. You're going to have to really step it up to something like one of Mark Williams' own differentials. I don't know if a Dana 80 or a built 10.5" 14 bolt would tollerate that or not. I would suggest looking thru this thread to see what you are going to need in a rear end. http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=469935 |
Re: rear end decisions
Checked out Mark Williams site at their rear ends. As for choosing gear ratio, not sure about those. And with wheel to wheel dimensions, are they asking inside rim to inside rim or inside tire to inside tire or what?
Now as far as bolt patterns go, you think it might be possible if they could make it 6 lug instead of 5x5 or 5 1/2x5? |
Re: rear end decisions
I like Alstons site for their tech sheet. It give you a good work sheet to start with.
http://www.cachassisworks.com/Attach...structions.pdf |
Re: rear end decisions
Im gonna say Dana 60 as a minimum . If you are headed to the power levels posted above , then no need to build the rear end twice or three times . 35 or 40 spline , 10 to 10.5 ring gear , 5/8 studs and as many as possible considering fullsize truck weight and big power . I believe currie has a size calculator that will fill in the blanks .
|
Re: rear end decisions
You can do that with a 9 inch. I wouldn't use a factory one though. Get a Fab 9 or have your friend weld back braces to good tubes. Then a Moser or a Strange center section and you are set.
Chris |
Re: rear end decisions
2 Attachment(s)
Moser Dana 60 w/35spline axles,Spool,4.30 pro gear, Billet 1350 yoke, big bearing Impala weld-on ends. Holding up well with transbrake and low 1.30 60's on a 31x14 Goodyear slick.
|
Re: rear end decisions
Trying to find the Like button for this ^^^^^^
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Also, lets take a few steps back. As for the power I'm running now, my set up is, 650 ft pnds torque 525 hp, built turbo 400, stock 12 bolt non posi rear end, and 28x12x15 goodyear slicks on 15x10 tims. Trailing arm suspension. Front and rear suspension has not been modified in any way yet. The information that has been put in this thread is great. Still want to hear more about rear ends and such for the kind of power that I want to make in the future. But, as for what I'm making now, I'd like to also know what would be a good rear end, and what kind of power it can handle. Would I just be better off buying or building a rear end that can handle the power I want to make in the future, that way I don't have to worry about blowing it out at any point of time? |
Re: rear end decisions
http://www.moserengineering.com/hous...d-package.html
The Moser Dana 60 package now has an option for 70-72 Chevy trucks brackets if you want a bolt in. I'm currently at 700tq on motor and + nitrous nearing 1,000tq. I had built the 12bolt truck rear w/33spline moser axles and twisted splines and bent housing tubes twice. And reason for a Dana was it's not a 9" . What motor combo are you running? |
Re: rear end decisions
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Current set up is 555 cu in big block, around 950 HP naturally aspirated, TH400 (full manual valve body, no brake) and 4.10 gears. MW spool, axles and c clip eliminators, welded tubes. Best ET is 9.85 at 136 mph, at 3950 lbs. Car has been going 11.80s or faster since 1990. K |
Re: rear end decisions
The sterling 10.25 comes to mind also .
|
Re: rear end decisions
A good 9" will do it just fine. Use an aluminum center section with the big pinion support, a pro gear and 40 spline gun drilled axles. Now the big problem is getting the rest of the truck to hold it. With that power level I would put a full chrome moly all round tube chassis under it. 4 link rear with a strut front. You can get away with a really good power glide but I would put a bruno or lenco drive in it. Those power numbers look like blower/turbo numbers with that huge torque or something well over 700 inches.
Jimmy |
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for motor, keeping it under 700 Cubic Inches, but will either be single or twin turbo non-alcoholic. |
Re: rear end decisions
I'd invest in a posi or spool for your dogleg 12 bolt. Who knows??? It may take it... A 12 bolt is pretty tough
|
Re: rear end decisions
If you look at the rule book you are getting into the very regulated chassis specs. You are also getting into a very high dollar chassis. The last top sportsman car I put together was a tad over 130K out of the owners pocket and that was a used Don Ness car and a new motor and trans. Just tell you chassis builder what power you have and let him handle the suspension and rear end. Don't be shocked at a 40K bill from him for a roller.
Jimmy |
Re: rear end decisions
I don't know PG,, will a 1000 pounds of torque put him below a 8.50 chassis cert? It for sure depends on it hooking and the power getting through the chassis, suspension and all the way to the track. As you well know, a lot of things between this 1000 pounds of flywheel torque and the track can keep the combination WAY slower than anyone might expect.
Still a 8.50 cert is going to be deep into his pocket. A roller 8.50 car in the 2500ish pound weight is still beckoning $15k $30k+ just depending on the quality / age of the build. And buying a used build is about 30¢ on the dollar these days. I honestly feel your $'s are very VERY realistic!! Low&slow,, prepare for sticker shoc in what the rest of the package is going to cost! |
Re: rear end decisions
Well the under 700 inches and a single or duel turbo making up to 1500 but at least a 1000 is 1300 plus HP. With a 706 making about 1300 hp and a 1000 ft pounds at about 2550 lbs with the driver we went 7.19 at 192 in not so good air. A truck wont go through the air like a grand am but if I had that much power like he wants to build and and could not run 7.80s some one is getting fired. A good chassis design and someone who knows what to do with it will be needed and 25.1 car will be what he has to have.
Jimmy |
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I get what you are saying as well. I'm not looking to go any faster than 8's Quote:
Also, what's a 25.1 car? |
Re: rear end decisions
I am working on going 8's.. Right now I have:
A steal front clip but no hood and cut up inner fenders Stock front suspension but home made cross member Stock frame from the front to the back of the cab, CM round tube from there back + 4-link 12 point CM cage Alum Gen 4 motor with power glide Summit racing seats With that said, truck weighs 3,200lbs with me in it, full tank of gas and full 15lb N20 bottle. I am in the middle of swapping out a built 12 bolt for a 9" |
Re: rear end decisions
SFI Spec 25.1E
Application: Pro Stock-type tube chassis roll cage; 7.49 seconds and faster; 2,800-pound maximum. Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
...but it can be done. This is my engine builder's car. 477 cu in big block, naturally aspirated. The car has gone 8.20's on motor. The only glass is the front bumper and hood. Built by himself in a one car garage in the Detroit suburbs. At the events I attend (mostly NMCA Fastest Street Car series) this car is on the high end of well running/stock appearing. By the way, that #1 on the windshield: that's earned. Four time NMCA World Champion in the Nostalgia Muscle Car/American Muscle categories. I runner up'd twice in my 15 years with the NMCA/NSCA. Guess who beat me? (lol) |
Re: rear end decisions
Well going racing in a truck or a car takes a good plan. First is what class, next how fast do i want to go, then what rules do i need to meet to go that fast. About what will it weigh, how much power do I need to go that fast and how do I want to make that power. The more detailed the plan the better the end result will be with only having to do things once.
Jimmy |
Re: rear end decisions
Look into the 2003 and newer 2500 series GM vans. They have a D60 axle that has 3.5" axle tubes and huge bearings. With some custom shafts, it would be a stout setup.
|
Re: rear end decisions
Going low 8's on that tire is quite an accomplishment!!! What is it a 8.5" slick?
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
I tease him that my front tires are bigger than that. He actually got thrown out of a Milan All Motor meet because his tires were too small....at least that was the excuse they used. ;) K |
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
It's a beautiful car which was built to the letter of the rules. I guess some folks were pretty desparate to find something wrong (after getting themselves embarrassed by its performance). K |
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: rear end decisions
Quote:
[/QUOTE]What is your fastest pass so far without a posi unit ? were you planning on spraying it with an open diff ?[/QUOTE] R/T: .078 60': 1.972 1/8: 8.443 MPH: 83.02 1/4: 13.053 MPH: 100.56 I'm not exactly sure what my rear end is. I can do a burnout and the passenger tire spins, but I can do another burnout in a different location and the driver side tire spins. I know it's not a posi though. I've had a posi. |
Re: rear end decisions
Tech keeps the poor guy slow unless he keeps clear of the track... Ridiculous prices! I could build a nice house and prolly do it in less time.... What's the deal there? Gut check! That's why I bought a welder. And let me tell ya, it's not hard. Altho im no pro, cause I lack experience, learning is easy. Forget paying
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com