![]() |
Any reason not to...
Run RE-6's up front ?
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Wussat?
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Yea, RE who?
DLB |
Re: Any reason not to...
I knew I shoulda posted this in the suspension forum
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
DLB |
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
|
Re: Any reason not to...
In my opinon the RE6 are a little light for your truck I would not run any thing lower than an RE7
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Run the RE7. You need the weight and the added lift is nice too. They both lower the same.
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there only a difference of 100 lbs. between the RE-6 and the RE-7 as far as weight capacity goes? If you're using a stock shock setup up front, you won't be able to use the extra lift capacity of the RE-7, at least I can't. I have RE-6s up front and my shock tops out before the bag reaches max height. The cool thing about the RE-6 is that it's smaller in diameter (obviously), and I didn't have to use cups. I just made a flat circular plate that sits in the lower coil pocket, no clearance issues what so ever.
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
Diameter: 6" Min height: 3" Max height: 10" Max PSI: 180 RE-7 Diameter: 7" Min height: 3" Max height: 11" Max PSI: 180 RE-8 Diameter: 7.75" Min height: 3" Max height: 11" Max PSI: 180 RE-6 Replaces a firestone 255c or contitech 2500# bag. (Front) RE-7 Replaces a firestone 224c or contitech 2600# bag. (Rear) RE-8 Replaces a firestone 2800# bag. (Rear duallys) Yeah, only 100 lbs & one inch smaller tall & wide Quote:
I just thought that if I could do like thekid54 And not use cups & just make a flat circular plate that sits in the lower coil pocket, that It'd solve part of the "nose bleed" problem (front sitting higher than rear) Thanks Joe67, you :metal: |
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
If anyone has pics of the upper being reverse cupped, that'd be great too I just wanna get as low as I can, without spending much money & I can't afford lower arms or drop spindles (plus I see no reason I can't get as low as I want, by just running no cup on the bottom & if I have to cup the top) |
Re: Any reason not to...
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
|
Re: Any reason not to...
my arms use to be like that but i decided to drag them off. now i have stock arms with 1 inch cups.. i ran the re-7s and then switched to the 6.. i ended up having to run more pressure to get less height.. it says its an inch shorter but i think it was alittle more in my case.. either way i still have plenty if height to get over stuff
|
Re: Any reason not to...
Quote:
I'm love'n those Do you think that they'd hold water ? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com