![]() |
High Hump
I just ran across this while looking for something else. I did not realize that steel high humps were being reproduced. They must be fairly new. I see that complete firewalls are now available also.
https://www.classicparts.com/1960-63...ctinfo/40-416/ |
Re: High Hump
Nice find.
|
Re: High Hump
I know there is a vendor working on doing a high hump and the firewall part. Not sure where they are in the process.
Jimmy |
Re: High Hump
Are you taking about Mike Losh?
http://sloshtubz.net/shop.html#!/Hig...egory=18977113 Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
Clarification on the high hump...whats the need for it...?
|
Re: High Hump
Nope one of big the metal guys. I supplied them with a high hump and the fire wall piece. They planned to scan the pieces and see if they could start making them. They have the resources to do it.
Jimmy |
Re: High Hump
The SM420, SM435, SM465 and most newer OEM and aftermarket 5 and 6 speed transmissions need the room.
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
Is it someone that will make them domestically?
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
I think they will be out of one of the Taiwanese plants. They are a big supplier of body parts and the resources to get stuff done.
Jimmy |
Re: High Hump
The high hump cover I posted a link to is likely made by that supplier.
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
Interesting. Great find.
|
Re: High Hump
I just received my trans cover today from classic parts and it is not the high hump. From the picture in classics site its hard to tell. I'll give them a call on Monday and see if the high cover is available.
|
Re: High Hump
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
2 Attachment(s)
Here are a couple of pics of the trans cover. It seems well made just not tall enough.
|
Re: High Hump
3 Attachment(s)
OK, I'm not a metal fabricator. But I was looking at what the PO had done to get the trans to clear (first Picture).There are some really good fabricators on this site and I was wondering if anyone has modified their low hump like this? It might be a bit of work but I thought it might work pretty well.
|
Re: High Hump
So it isn't a high hump as it appears in the pics......I stand corrected.
|
Re: High Hump
the picture was not very detailed. Since I have not found another high hump I was thinking of modifying mine as pictured.
|
Re: High Hump
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
Quote:
Good luck with the project, Tom |
Re: High Hump
No, the '67-'72's had both low and high hump trans covers.
Quote:
|
Re: High Hump
1 Attachment(s)
I found this tonight on ebay when searching for a high hump cover...Interesting...not a bad price $150 shipped.
|
Re: High Hump
I see that they also have one with no holes, which is nice. However the one review on this cover is not good.
|
Re: High Hump
I just saw that review. Looks like only part of the 2 piece high hump...wonder why they don't make the upper portion?
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...1&d=1384646598 |
Re: High Hump
The forward section would be difficult and quite expensive to reproduce. I doubt that people would pay the kind of money a quality steel reproduction would cost when the Slosh Tubz fiberglass version is available.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com