Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

Hey folks. I haven’t been on here in a while with a question but finally getting back to my project. Was wondering do I need a high hump trans tunnel to run a 4L80E and a 5.3 or will a low hump work just fine? I was thinking the trans is bulkier on the driveshaft end of the trans. Thanks

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

I'm running a 6.2 with a 4L60E and the low hump works fine. It's tight on the top, just a couple of inches, but it fits OK. No issue with the column shifter hooking up either, I used a Lokar rod kit. Had to bend it a little, but it works excellent.

On a previous build, I had a 5.3 with a 4L60E there as well, no issues with either one.

Hope this helps, and good luck!!

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

Ditto on the no need for the high hump...

Have mine installed now and no worries with clearance...

:chevy::chevy::chevy:

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

Thanks y’all.

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

low hump and 4l60e combo work with truck pan oil pan on a slammed truck? im about to fit the engine but heard I might need a f body oil pan.

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

Anything lower than 4” in the front will need the fbody pan

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

thanks I wasn't sure if I could raise the whole engine and tranny up or not.

Re: Do I need a high hump for a 4L60E?
 

CTS-V pan works pretty good.

Bubba