|
11-11-2010, 06:17 PM | #1 |
Who Me?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 4,067
|
Steelie question
Is the 6 lug on our 60-66 2WD trucks the same pattern as the K5 Blazer 6 lug wheels?
__________________
Steve 1997 Tahoe LT 4D 2WD (DD) 2001 Blazer 4D 2WD 1961 Apache 10 (sold) 1965 C10 Stepper (sold) |
11-11-2010, 06:31 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwell Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 2,882
|
Re: Steelie question
Yes it is.
|
11-12-2010, 05:29 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gresham , Oregon
Posts: 588
|
Re: Steelie question
Thats whats on my 62 for wheels ..
|
11-12-2010, 08:24 AM | #4 |
Hollister, CA.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hollister, Ca.
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Steelie question
Same here .... I got a set too
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
John What the Heck is that ?? CURRENT BUILDS: 62 BurbMaster Other Builds: My '63 C-10,LWB,CC,BBW '06 HD StrAight Axle Swap Father/Son '67 C-20, LQ9,4L80,Bagged,8-Lugger !!Good Friend Richard's Build AMERICAN CUSTOMS & CLASSICS (831) 630-1965 www.ACCHOLLISTER.com ACC on FACEBOOK "Rest in Peace, Mom & Dad ... I will see you again someday!" |
11-12-2010, 11:36 AM | #5 |
Who Me?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 4,067
|
Re: Steelie question
Thats what im looking for.. How wide are yours? Im looking to do 10's in the rear and 8's in the front if I can find them.
__________________
Steve 1997 Tahoe LT 4D 2WD (DD) 2001 Blazer 4D 2WD 1961 Apache 10 (sold) 1965 C10 Stepper (sold) |
11-13-2010, 06:07 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gresham , Oregon
Posts: 588
|
Re: Steelie question
Mine are 15x8's all the way around ... Stock width .. I'm running 235-60R-15 on the front with 305-50R-15 's on the rear ..with stock beauty rings .. I'm gonna change to 275-60R-15 's when its time to replace .. Availability and I want a little taller profile ..
|
11-13-2010, 06:57 PM | #7 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: Steelie question
Nice looking truck.
|
11-14-2010, 02:34 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gresham , Oregon
Posts: 588
|
Re: Steelie question
Thanks markeb01 for the compliment !! You also have a nice truck !!! Simular to the one my father had as I was growing up .. Brings back good memories .. Very Nice !! I may have a 63 GMC Longbed 1/2 ton , V6 , A/T , Custom .. in the next month or so .. I have my fingers crossed , just need to gather up the money ..
Last edited by 62 Longbed; 11-14-2010 at 02:38 AM. |
11-14-2010, 08:28 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: jackson, michigan
Posts: 246
|
Re: Steelie question
Even though they both have the 5.5 bolt circle, isn't the center bore size different (smaller) on the newer trucks than ours? If so, anyone know what year the change(s) occurred? I heard you can get 1/4 inch spacer plates to get the wheel out far enough so that center bore size is not an issue. Also like info on that if anyone knows.
www.picturetrail.com/skysoldier173rd Last edited by skysoldier173rd; 11-14-2010 at 08:29 AM. |
11-14-2010, 10:11 AM | #10 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: Steelie question
According to post #11 on the following thread from Raycow, the wheels to use are 71-87 (4x4). The 88 and up wheels have the smaller center hole:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=430426 Personally I would be reluctant to use spacers as they may put more strain on the studs, and may also provide insufficient engagement unless the studs are replaced with longer units. |
11-14-2010, 12:58 PM | #11 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
|
Re: Steelie question
Quote:
Using these you don't lose the hub-centric mounting advantages. I am betting though if the "new wheels" have a smaller hub than the existing truck hub that the spacers would have to be thicker than a 1/4". With the cheap spacers like these http://www.jegs.com/i/Mr.+Gasket/720/2376/10002/-1 you loose the hubcentric advantages. Last edited by lakeroadster; 11-14-2010 at 01:01 PM. |
|
11-14-2010, 07:58 PM | #12 |
Who Me?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 4,067
|
Re: Steelie question
More great info. Im still running drums on the front and plan to keep it that way. Hopefully the stock wheels wont be an issue.
__________________
Steve 1997 Tahoe LT 4D 2WD (DD) 2001 Blazer 4D 2WD 1961 Apache 10 (sold) 1965 C10 Stepper (sold) |
11-15-2010, 07:28 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gresham , Oregon
Posts: 588
|
Re: Steelie question
I'm still running the stock drum setup frt. & rear .. No Problems .. Even when upgrading to a newer frt. suspension or just doing the disc only conversion all should work well together since the stock Rallys were 99% of the time always on a model with factory disc exactly like we end up swapping over to .. 2 whl or 4 whl drive .. There is enough clearance and depth , for rotor and caliper offset ...
Last edited by 62 Longbed; 11-15-2010 at 07:29 PM. |
11-16-2010, 06:05 PM | #14 |
Who Me?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 4,067
|
Re: Steelie question
Now I just need to find a set.
__________________
Steve 1997 Tahoe LT 4D 2WD (DD) 2001 Blazer 4D 2WD 1961 Apache 10 (sold) 1965 C10 Stepper (sold) |
11-16-2010, 10:28 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 66
|
Re: Steelie question
Lake Roadster was right about wheeladapter.com, even if you don't need the adapters-talk to Fred over there, he is a cool old guy that ran around with Shelby in his hey day and has good stories. He makes the adapter as you need them.
__________________
Bad Decisions usually make for Good Stories. Last edited by iiizman; 11-17-2010 at 02:33 AM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|