The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2017, 12:05 PM   #1
Aaron Burkemper
Registered User
 
Aaron Burkemper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Melle, MO
Posts: 104
Trailing arm reinforcement

What have some of you done for reinforcing rear trailing arms? I am putting a new set on my 71 C20 2WD. I see the factory had a small plate mounted to the top for extra strength. It doesn't seem like it would do that much, frankly. I was considering boxing in a portion before I put them on. Any previous experience? Pics would be great.
__________________
1971 C20 "Shreck"
1980 C30 dump bed "Ratchett"
Aaron Burkemper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 03:21 PM   #2
mikecaddy500
Registered User
 
mikecaddy500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: howard city mi
Posts: 83
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Mine were rusted out from someone doing that previously. I opted to spend the extra money for tubular arms.
mikecaddy500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 03:37 PM   #3
nightrider388
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 147
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

What I have seen a lot of people do is weld all the seems on top and bottom and it basically makes them a solid box and keeps moisture out.
nightrider388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 06:53 PM   #4
Aaron Burkemper
Registered User
 
Aaron Burkemper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Melle, MO
Posts: 104
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

There sure are a lot of options for upgraded arms and the like. I couldn't see spending that kind of money on a rusty farm truck.
__________________
1971 C20 "Shreck"
1980 C30 dump bed "Ratchett"
Aaron Burkemper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 09:32 PM   #5
pappy 2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: ord, NE.
Posts: 98
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

stich-welded top and bottom seam.
Attached Images
 
pappy 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2017, 09:32 PM   #6
FirstOwner69
Senior Member
 
FirstOwner69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin & Arizona
Posts: 4,843
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Burkemper View Post
What have some of you done for reinforcing rear trailing arms? I am putting a new set on my 71 C20 2WD. I see the factory had a small plate mounted to the top for extra strength. It doesn't seem like it would do that much, frankly. I was considering boxing in a portion before I put them on. Any previous experience? Pics would be great.
I believe only the 3/4 ton trucks had reinforcing plates. There were two plates, one riveted below the trailing arm and one above. The half tons used the same trailing arms without plates. Based on that, I'd say you probably do not need the plates unless you do some heavy 3/4 ton type hauling.

Here are pictures that show the top and bottom plates.
Attached Images
  
FirstOwner69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 09:36 AM   #7
Aaron Burkemper
Registered User
 
Aaron Burkemper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Melle, MO
Posts: 104
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

That is correct. It's going on a C20, but I couldn't find specific C20 arms. I guess you buy C10 arms and add plates yourself. Or some other reinforcement. I don't know if it would really make a difference if you aren't working your truck like a 3/4.
__________________
1971 C20 "Shreck"
1980 C30 dump bed "Ratchett"
Aaron Burkemper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 10:18 PM   #8
68c10airstream
Registered User
 
68c10airstream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Marquette michigan
Posts: 828
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Was there trailing arms on c20's??? I thought they were only on c10's, but not sure now!!
68c10airstream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 09:37 AM   #9
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,928
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68c10airstream View Post
Was there trailing arms on c20's??? I thought they were only on c10's, but not sure now!!
Sure are. My stepson just acquired an 1969 C20 that has a D60 and trailing arms with huge coils

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 08:08 PM   #10
FirstOwner69
Senior Member
 
FirstOwner69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin & Arizona
Posts: 4,843
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68c10airstream View Post
Was there trailing arms on c20's??? I thought they were only on c10's, but not sure now!!
Coil spring rear ends were standard on Chevy 3/4 tons with leafs as an option. I've read that leafs were standard on GMCs with coils as an option.
FirstOwner69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 10:49 PM   #11
indymachinist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Indanapolis, IN
Posts: 604
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

I too stitch welded my trailing arms. I have heard you want to stick with the I-beam style (dont box them in, dont do tubular, etc) for best performance. The fact is these NEED to be able to flex. Its part of the design. You just don't want the 2 halves to separate.
__________________
-Curt

My 1968 Chevy shortbed stepside build
indymachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 09:48 AM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,943
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by indymachinist View Post
I too stitch welded my trailing arms. I have heard you want to stick with the I-beam style (dont box them in, dont do tubular, etc) for best performance. The fact is these NEED to be able to flex. Its part of the design. You just don't want the 2 halves to separate.
The beam style works in factory form because they can twist (by design) & the front rubber bushings allow for some flex.

Stitch welds won't inhibit the ability to flex. Aftermarket 'tubular' arms offer increased rigidity but will bind sooner vs. factory arms unless some sort of different front bushing is used. That's why those that 'get it' build their T/A's w/some type of spherical joint up front for articulation.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 11:26 AM   #13
indymachinist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Indanapolis, IN
Posts: 604
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
The beam style works in factory form because they can twist (by design) & the front rubber bushings allow for some flex.

Stitch welds won't inhibit the ability to flex. Aftermarket 'tubular' arms offer increased rigidity but will bind sooner vs. factory arms unless some sort of different front bushing is used. That's why those that 'get it' build their T/A's w/some type of spherical joint up front for articulation.
The spherical joint in front is not what limits the flex. It is the tubular construction itself.

Flex in these truck arms is required for articulation. If they were truely solid and would not flex, you would end up with basically a hinge for rear suspension. If one wheel went up or down, the other would have to follow exactly the same motion. This is not ideal at all.

Look at the nascar truck arms... they are I-beam, stitch welded, and have spherical joints in the front. They WANT the arms to flex, on purpose.


FWIW, I am using stock arms with no plates added, stitch welded, and with Hotchkiss spherical front joints. Pretty budget friendly, and more than adequate for my uses.
__________________
-Curt

My 1968 Chevy shortbed stepside build
indymachinist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 12:07 PM   #14
hounddogs!
Restoring it $200 at a time...
 
hounddogs!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NE Kansas
Posts: 886
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

I blew apart a set of 1/2T arms and started there. Got the two sides clean and coated, then basically followed the factory spot weld pattern to reconnect them. I had new plates cut to beef up to the 3/4T design. The attached PDF is the drawing I used to have new top/bottom plates cut. I used the axle u-bolt to locate the plate, then clamped and plug welded. The rectangular piece in the lower right was for patch panels in the vertical web. Those are visible on the arm on the left below.

All the joints are slathered in seam sealer - I am not going to let these get full of dirt.
Attached Images
 
Attached Images
File Type: pdf trailing arm reinf Feb 2017.pdf (61.4 KB, 195 views)
__________________
Charter member of the 'Put the dimmer switch back on the damn floor where it belongs' Society


'68 5.3L-4 speed LWB C20; grandpa bought it for the farm in '71. Now LS 5.3, rather than 327.

DD '09 Pilot

Weekender '65 Skylark 300-4V-4 speed

Wife's '07 Lexus ES350; 117 actuator motors and I can't see the engine.

Son's '04 F250 SuperCab 6.0

Last edited by hounddogs!; 09-01-2017 at 12:33 PM.
hounddogs! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 09:17 PM   #15
Tom Vogel
2WD Jimmy
 
Tom Vogel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davis County, Utah
Posts: 2,563
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

I used the Early Classic Enterprises top and bottom reinforcement plates. They are really solid now. Good product.
Tom Vogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 06:19 AM   #16
Shaky
Six in a row makes it go...
 
Shaky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vacationland: Maine
Posts: 1,346
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

I was on a budget early on in my C20 project. The arms were still good, but rust was forming in between the reinforcing plates and the arms. I drilled the rivets, made new plates, and bolted it back together.

You could do something similar to make 1/2 ton arms into 3/4 ton arms.
Attached Images
    
__________________
67 C20 long step resto: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342086
66 C10 long step build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post3814790
CT to Alaska in a 67 C10: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399224
“The height of sophistication is simplicity." - Clare Boothe Luce
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 09:20 AM   #17
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,861
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Is any of this really necessary? Just asking because I've never done anything and never saw a reason to. I don't see rust being an issue on a pleasure ride. Plenty of originals out there still not rusted, too.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 12:28 PM   #18
Shaky
Six in a row makes it go...
 
Shaky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vacationland: Maine
Posts: 1,346
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K View Post
Is any of this really necessary? Just asking because I've never done anything and never saw a reason to. I don't see rust being an issue on a pleasure ride. Plenty of originals out there still not rusted, too.
Depends on your truck/situation, yes?

You can:

1) Run your rusty ones (I know people who do);
2) Find better used replacements;
3) Rebuild/reinforce your old ones;
4) Run 1/2 ton arms on your 3/4 ton cuz you don't carry heavy loads;
5) Buy aftermarket tubulars.

I wanted to rescue mine before the rust got worse. Probably didn't need the reinforcement, but I'm keeping my C20 all 3/4 ton and might tow with it occasionally.
__________________
67 C20 long step resto: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342086
66 C10 long step build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post3814790
CT to Alaska in a 67 C10: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399224
“The height of sophistication is simplicity." - Clare Boothe Luce
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 10:09 AM   #19
Tom Vogel
2WD Jimmy
 
Tom Vogel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davis County, Utah
Posts: 2,563
Re: Trailing arm reinforcement

In my case, running high horsepower and sticky tires, yes. In many cases , no.
Tom Vogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com