The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2003, 11:40 PM   #1
C-10volvo
Registered User
 
C-10volvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, Oregon
Posts: 1,028
rims rims rims.....

well, i went into a local speed shop today to get some price quotes on some rims. i really want to go with the tourq' thrust II's. they would either be in a front:18/8 rear 18/10, or front 20/8 rear:20/10. i really want to go with the 20's but it will cost about 500 a rim. thats 2000 plus about 600 or 700 for tires. what do you think? and yes, they do make them in 20's. but its custom made....tell me what you think...or any other selections of rims...

ohh and by the way i want peoples faces to be like when i roll by.
__________________
Ken Morgan
For fun: 1964 Volvo 122
For slow: 1984 Chevrolet C-10
For everything else: 1997 BMW M3
C-10volvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2003, 12:11 AM   #2
phantom dually
Project92 SWB stepside
 
phantom dually's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 4,793
I think 20's are a little to big for these trucks unless you can tuck them. A 18 on the front and a 20 on the rear would be killer!! Gotta TUCK them though or it wont look right.
__________________
92 C1500 stepside 496 Stroker Competiton Engineering Ladder bars/QA1 coilovers. Dana 60 rear with 4.10 gear and posi. Bonspeed Palisade 20x12 in rear w/335/30/20 and 20x8.5 front w/245/40/20. 5/8 drop with Belltech springs/DJM spindles/drop shocks. WWS Progress thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=140448
phantom dually is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2003, 12:41 AM   #3
PHOENIX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 4,703
I say get the 18's, they will look great.
Nothin' against 20's! But I would get the 18's
__________________
* AVOID: LOPER'S PERMORANCE / LOPERSPEED.COM OF PHOENIX, AZ & COTTMAN TRANSMISSION *
PHOENIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2003, 02:18 PM   #4
AirMale
Senior Member
 
AirMale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
Posts: 1,073
I got 20's and they look better than my best friends 18 torque thrst II's. GET 20's!!! And where the hell do you get off thinking $600 or $700 for tires....try minimum of $800 plus lugs, nice stems and don't forget the install and hi-speed balance. Just do it right the first time and you won't have $2500 into wheels you don't like. I'd rather have $3k+ and not be able to stop starring at my wheels. Don't even think about gettin those Goodyear GT-II's--->get an aggressive tread pattern like Kumho or BFG. Just put it on the card-->Post some pics when ya get sorted out.
__________________
86 SWB 9.0 LITER
T-400-OD 4.11 eaton-4/5 drop
Best 1/4 12.51 @112mph no traction
AirMale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2003, 11:25 PM   #5
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
For my rim/tire setup. I paid $175 per rim (17x9½) and $90 per tire (255/55 17). I ALMOST did 18's, but the price difference vs look didn't warrant 18's. I think my rims look BEST in 17's (I've seen them in 18's and 20's...the spokes get too skinny imho.)
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2003, 11:41 PM   #6
swervin ervin
You get what you pay for
 
swervin ervin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
Well, my opinion is, and maybe it's because I'm getting old, but I think on our trucks, anything over 17" is too much rim and not enough tire. It just looks funny to me, but too each his own.

Don't any of you guys with 20's get all hostile. I said looks funny to me, not you. If you like them, this is all that matters. You are not trying to please me anyway, right??
__________________
Mike

1985 Chevy C-10
swervin ervin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 06:43 AM   #7
Bitter Beard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 27
I gotta agree with Ervin, but I'm an old crusty bastard myself so it all comes down to personal taste.

Is the ride affected at all with larger rims or is that just collateral damage and accepted?
Bitter Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 08:55 AM   #8
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Swervin, I agree with 'the too small of a tire' theory but IMO if you do the math & keep the sidewall height greater than say a 245/45 or @ least 4+" in height, it doesn't matter if it's a 17, 18, or a 20.

The wrong size tire for the wheel (too narrow/wide, too short) & too much gap between the tire & fenderwell do more to hurt the 'look' than wheels greater than 17" in diameter.

As for the GoodYr II's, sizing is more important than an aggressive tread pattern when it comes to a truck tire. My buddy Keith has them on his 01 sportside chevy w/a 4/6 drop & they ride good & look decent for their cost. If they offered more selections in size I would consider them if the price was still comparable.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 10:11 AM   #9
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by SCOTI
Swervin, I agree with 'the too small of a tire' theory but IMO if you do the math & keep the sidewall height greater than say a 245/45 or @ least 4+" in height, it doesn't matter if it's a 17, 18, or a 20.

The wrong size tire for the wheel (too narrow/wide, too short) & too much gap between the tire & fenderwell do more to hurt the 'look' than wheels greater than 17" in diameter.

As for the GoodYr II's, sizing is more important than an aggressive tread pattern when it comes to a truck tire. My buddy Keith has them on his 01 sportside chevy w/a 4/6 drop & they ride good & look decent for their cost. If they offered more selections in size I would consider them if the price was still comparable.
He has the maroon single cab stepside right? Yeah his truck looks clean but the 99+ are one of the only trucks that can use that tire and make it look good.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 11:03 AM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Yep, thats the one.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 01:16 AM   #11
C-10volvo
Registered User
 
C-10volvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, Oregon
Posts: 1,028
alright, ive but some thought in to it, and checked my bank account haha. and i think im gonna go with the 20's. i know thoes goodyears are trouble... but what are some other choices. i have about 3 to spend. 2 on rims, 1 on tires and all the rest. "AirMale" what do you think about backspacing? since they are custom i can do anything. i would like the edge of the rubber to be at my fender. im really tired of my really weak 235's sitting about 3 inches in!! i just cant wait to have them. now my rims on my 1964 volvo will match my truck haha.
thanks for all your comments, including the "old crusty bastard". hey im 16, i want 20's!!
__________________
Ken Morgan
For fun: 1964 Volvo 122
For slow: 1984 Chevrolet C-10
For everything else: 1997 BMW M3
C-10volvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 06:08 AM   #12
AirMale
Senior Member
 
AirMale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
Posts: 1,073
My set up is:
Front-> 20X8.5 with 4.75" backspacing w/255/35/20 Kumho

Rear-> 20X10 with 5" backspacing w/295/40/20 Kumho

Rims Boyd coddington turbines, custom made. Bought from Aftermarket www.Got20.com cost me $2150

Tires Kumho 712's from www.tires.com cost me $800

New lugs and stems $38
Locally mounted $75
__________________
86 SWB 9.0 LITER
T-400-OD 4.11 eaton-4/5 drop
Best 1/4 12.51 @112mph no traction

Last edited by AirMale; 06-15-2003 at 06:58 AM.
AirMale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 06:54 AM   #13
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally posted by AirMale
My set up is:
Front-> 15X8.5 with 4.75" backspacing w/255/35/20 Kumho

Rear-> 15X10 with 5" backspacing w/295/40/20 Kumho

Rims Boyd coddington turbines, custom made. Bought from Aftermarket www.Got20.com cost me $2150

Tires Kumho 712's from www.tires.com cost me $800

New lugs and stems $38
Locally mounted $75
You mean 20x8½ and 20x10...ahem, ahem.
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 02:20 PM   #14
Zorro_sn
Phat Ass Chevy
 
Zorro_sn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Tx
Posts: 164
yea i like the 18's
__________________
Slammed...Shaved...Restored...
Before and After Pix
Zorro_sn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 05:38 PM   #15
apstguy
LED King
 
apstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,088
I'm 17! I don't want bling-bling dubs on my truck! These are old trucks! I say the largest I would go is 18. I have 15s right now, but they could be bigger.
__________________
Tyler

1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles
2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick
2016 Chevy Spark EV
Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6
Gone: 2008 VW R32
apstguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 05:55 PM   #16
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Once you swap 'em back & forth from 15's @ all 4 corners to 18's up front & 20's out back, they don't look quite so 'big'. When I put the 20's on the back of my 74 they actually look just right . . .... not to big, not to small. For me, a 245-40-20 is too short on the sidewall for the front when driven alot so I just went w/18's & a 45 series tire.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com