The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2002, 09:12 AM   #1
bigcarguy
Finally a Bulldawg
 
bigcarguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 220
Rocker Arm question

Do our trucks (307 in mine) have 1.5 ratio rocker arms? I've read in numerous magazines how if you replace 1.5s with either 1.6s or 1.7s that you'll get some extra lift. I'm thinking of putting a mild cam in the truck eventually so I wouldn't want to risk any valve-to-piston crunches. I'll probably put roller rockers in the truck anyway but was thinking of going with a higher ratio. Anyone do this?
bigcarguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 09:18 AM   #2
my new 72
faster, faster, faster
 
my new 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston ,Texas ,USA
Posts: 1,354
The stock ratio is 1.5. If you go too high with a ratio you can have problems with push rod clearance. Most head builders recommend no higher than 1.6. For you application, the higher ratio is more trouble than it's worth. Get a bigger cam to achieve the same affect. You won't have any problems with geometry if you do.
__________________
I'm going to Law School, wanna debate? It's good practice.
my new 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 01:48 PM   #3
Blue68
Registered User
 
Blue68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Frisco, Tx, USA
Posts: 606
Going with roller rockers of 1.5 ratio would probably gain you a dozen or more ponies alone. And a cam swap will do even more. ONLY you need to keep in mind a few things. The 307 was one of the first smog engines GM built. It's a great little engine and will run forever. But the displacement and ratio is limiting on making power. Essentially this is a stroked 283. So it makes good torque but isn't able to make much in the HP realm. The stroking reduced emissions.

You may find that a "mild" cam on a 350 turns radical when installed in a 307 due to the decrease in displacement.

Your heads may be a limiting factor as well with small valves.

By no means should any of this discourage you. Hot rodding is powering up what you've got. I would have loved to do some of these modifications to my 307 just out of curiosity more than anything else. GM never made a HO 307 and look though I might, I never found a hot rodded one. Lots of pumped up 305's out there (but it has a larger bore) making 300 hp and over 300 lb/ft of torque.
__________________
http://home.comcast.net/~r.landrum/w...tos.html-.html

'68 C-10 LWB, '98 Z-71 350 w/accessories (Serpentine), Edelbrock Performer, Edelbrock 1405 (600cfm) carb, GM HEI, CompCam Extreme 4x4 roller cam, Thorley Headers, Carter Electric Fuel Pump, Vintage Air, 700r4, 3.73, disc brakes and power steering upgrades.
Blue68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 02:15 PM   #4
bigcarguy
Finally a Bulldawg
 
bigcarguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 220
Well, I'd absolutely love to put all this stuff on a 350, but like you said, you gotta fix up what you got. I had a 77 Camaro with a 305 that I did alot to. It didn't make 300hp, but it was enough to shut all the Honda guys up. So what would be a good cam for a 307? I want it to be mild cause I'm trying to be somewhat concious of gas mileage, but I'm willing to give up a couple mpg for some good power. I may eventually move to a larger engine, but for now I'll just have to see what I can get out of the ol 307.
__________________
Ah yes, the college life. School all morning, work all night, study when ya can. Uh...
bigcarguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2002, 04:17 PM   #5
Blue68
Registered User
 
Blue68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Frisco, Tx, USA
Posts: 606
To be honest, I'd do what I did. Call some of the cam folks. You can contact Comp Cams @ 1-800-999-0853 or send them an email outlining all the infor needed on http://www.compcams.com/information/...on/default.asp I did both. Or call someone like Sallee-Chevrolet (www.sallee-chevrolet.com) who sells a lot of their cams and has experience selling and running them. Do both and compare the answers.

You may find prowling around the compcams.com catalog useful if you have broadband connection. I'm running a roller cam so we'd be talking apples to oranges but it is a Comp Cams Extreme 4x4 X4260HR. Something similar with flat tappet might be any of the Extreme 4x4 flat tappet cams. Kind of depends on where you want to make power. (The 4x4 cams are on p78-79).

Main thing to be concerned about is valve to piston clearance. That's where talking to the professionals is very important unless you intend to pull your heads and measure it yourself. You will probably need new springs as well.
__________________
http://home.comcast.net/~r.landrum/w...tos.html-.html

'68 C-10 LWB, '98 Z-71 350 w/accessories (Serpentine), Edelbrock Performer, Edelbrock 1405 (600cfm) carb, GM HEI, CompCam Extreme 4x4 roller cam, Thorley Headers, Carter Electric Fuel Pump, Vintage Air, 700r4, 3.73, disc brakes and power steering upgrades.
Blue68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com