The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2005, 09:26 PM   #1
Vince Putt
Hippy
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: kaska, pa
Posts: 95
am I nuts?

I'm building a 67 SWB from the ground up. The floor is pretty much toast in the truck along with cab mounts. I have a long wheelbase frame in OK shape and a SWB frame that looks as if sandblasting might not save it. I'd also have to do a complete rebuild of the rear suspension including new trailing arms and coming up with a 5 X5 rear axle.

I also have an 85 SWB chassis complete pro street roller with ford 9" disk brakes custom made exhaust and an 85 cab totally rust free. The 85 frame won't be a bolt in to the 67 but if I used the 85 floor pan sectioned into the 67 cab I could be up good to go. I did some measuring of the two gutted cabs and all the measurements I took are very close so close it's scary.

The advantages are numerous the 85 frame is thicker, more rigid already setup with a and just need painting and detailing. I'd get dual saddle mounted fuel tanks. and a proven combination.

given the work involved in replacing and fitting all the oringinal floor on the 67 cab

Problems I see is that the wheelbases may be different 67SWB to 85 SWB.

That may mean that I have to remove the cab mounts and slide the cab forward or backward to center up the front wheelwell and or remount all the
rear suspension to center it the wheelwells.

So the question is am I nuts, should I seek medical help, Is there a doctor in the house? I'll lay on the couch study my drawings and await your answer
Vince Putt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 09:40 PM   #2
Chevyguy111786
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 1,127
yes you are nuts....but aren't we all?? we put 20,000 into a truck cuz we didn't wanna spend 20,000 on a new truck.....lol
Chevyguy111786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 09:44 PM   #3
LUV2XCLR8
The LuvShack Garage
 
LUV2XCLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevyguy111786
yes you are nuts....but aren't we all?? we put 20,000 into a truck cuz we didn't wanna spend 20,000 on a new truck.....lol
AIN'T THAT THE TRUTH
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers"
The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer
Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop
Big Piggy: "Goliath" 07 Kodiak C4500
Lil Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500
Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T
LUV2XCLR8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 09:45 PM   #4
Super Duck
Chevy Nuttttt
 
Super Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Maria Ca.
Posts: 568
if you can make it work go for it. you then get the best of both worlds. I say go for it.
__________________
67' Chev swb step side
69' SS elky
03' Chev ext cab 4X4

hey who lernt me to spell

is there anything else?
Super Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 11:05 PM   #5
Brainchild
Still drivin' a Rat Rod
 
Brainchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Monett Missouri
Posts: 4,925
It's all about doing what you want with the truck,and I say go for it,most of us would like to see the progress pics,and finished product.

Post lots of pics
__________________
Rusty Member #13872
Instead of saying.....you are a discomfort in the back of my front.....one should be able to say...... you are a pain in the *a$#*

71 GMC LWB
49 Chevy
85 Chevy G20

Check out my website
Brainchild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 02:42 AM   #6
Overdrive
Sawzall User
 
Overdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The snow infested Prairies of Canada (aka: Winnipeg, Manitoba)
Posts: 117
hmm... stretching the cab for more leg room comes to mind for getting rid of the extra wheelbase. ... or you could always shorten the '85 frame the extra few inches (easier). I believe it's 115" WB for the '67 compared to 117.5" WB for the '85. Using the '85 frame, I suppose you have no choice but to do a floor swap (due to gas tanks and frame kickup location, which would be prety cool in itself.
__________________


'67 GMC 910
Overdrive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 10:52 AM   #7
GreyHoundSteve
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 769
Yes, you are nuts ..... but so are the rest of us. We wouldnt dump so much money into an old truck unless we were nuts so i say go on and be cRaZy so long as it doesnt hurt anyone. Now the day that your out of the street corner turning tricks for truck parts ...... its time to get help.
GreyHoundSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 11:03 AM   #8
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Maybe you could look for a solid cab and more solid frame?? I think there would be a lot of problems trying to mount everything, rad. support, cab, bed, on the 85 frame. First thing to check is the wheelbase. If they are the same, or really really close, and you like a lot of work....go for it! Also, if your going through all the trouble...I'd make it a bad A$$ 4x4
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 04:57 PM   #9
Benrs86
Registered User
 
Benrs86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Brandon, SD, USA
Posts: 1,292
i wouldnt be afraid to swap floors. also, 2.5 inches is not much. if you split the difference the front wheel would be 1 and a quarter inches forward towards the front of the wheel well and the back would be back the same. not very noticeable. im building a 66 dodge crew cab. the body is on a 89 dodge frame with a cummins deisel. to make the body swap easier i cut the firewall and first 2 feet of the floor off the 89 dodge cab. the four door cab went right over it and it worked amazing. kept all the same mounts, kept the 89 steering column and mounts, ac and heater box, outside air vents and everything. it worked very very good for me, so hopefully it will for you too.
__________________
Brandon, SD
69 GMC 1/2 ton 2wd
wide long bed with wood
3 on the tree
350 engine 4 bolt main
rv cam
AIM = Alphray04
Benrs86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 06:36 PM   #10
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Mudder's 67 is on a late model chassis. He'd be the guy to talk to.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 06:38 PM   #11
JerseyGirl
American Woman!
 
JerseyGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 1,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUV2XCLR8
AIN'T THAT THE TRUTH
LMAO! This site is full of em.......including me!!!!!!!!
So yes..........you are nuts!
__________________
Tree Was Here!
Click here to see pics of my new rig!
JerseyGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 06:42 PM   #12
LUV2XCLR8
The LuvShack Garage
 
LUV2XCLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyGirl
LMAO! This site is full of em.......including me!!!!!!!!
So yes..........you are nuts!

FORGIVE HER, SHE'S TWISTED
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers"
The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer
Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop
Big Piggy: "Goliath" 07 Kodiak C4500
Lil Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500
Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T
LUV2XCLR8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 07:38 PM   #13
Vince Putt
Hippy
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: kaska, pa
Posts: 95
I talked with Mudder about this project a few months ago. My original idea was to adapt the 67 cab and floor to the 85 chassis. After I got everything tore apart I realized it wasn't going to be an easly feat because the 85 chassis kicks up under the seat in the cab area. Mudder has a much easier conversion (not to belittle his conversion in any way) because he was building a 4WD he simply built a body lift to clear the obstuctions. Well Ok looks like I'm in a group of people that are as crazy as I am and It's time to break out the plasma cutter.
Vince Putt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 07:53 PM   #14
Brainchild
Still drivin' a Rat Rod
 
Brainchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Monett Missouri
Posts: 4,925
Well if you were within driving distance I'd be willing to come over and help.Sounds like a great project.
__________________
Rusty Member #13872
Instead of saying.....you are a discomfort in the back of my front.....one should be able to say...... you are a pain in the *a$#*

71 GMC LWB
49 Chevy
85 Chevy G20

Check out my website
Brainchild is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com