The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2005, 11:33 PM   #1
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
thoughts on this traction setup

well 4 linking the '84 with coilovers has been on the to doo list for awhile now to control the violent wheel hop it gets on the rare occasion that it starts to hook up. i'm getting some 275 bfg drag radials in trade from a friend and i know its going to wheel hop like crazy if these things bite at all. i'm going to be spending most of my extra cash on my 4x4 for awhile since its going to be the daily driver so i don't have the money to 4 link the 84.

this is a design i've been thinking about for a little while and i think i can build it for less than 100 bucks. i've seen similar setups on first gen ford lightnings. i would use heims where the bars mount to the crossmember and where they mount to the axle so they would not effect articulation but they won't allow the axle to wrap up. and the leaves would remain on to serve as the actual suspension.

here is a rough design i threw into autocad

thoughts?
Attached Images
 
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 11:45 PM   #2
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Looks like a good design, but you have to take into consideration the length and angle of the bars, so the imaginary point where they would intersect, is the center of the truck.
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 11:57 PM   #3
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
the bars will be run parralle so their lines of action will never intersect. the only function they will serve is to stop axle wrap
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:03 AM   #4
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
so then wouldn't a set of slapper bars be better?
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:11 AM   #5
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanitysBane
so then wouldn't a set of slapper bars be better?
i haven't found a set that will work corectly in my application (flip kit)

i'm just wondering if this setup is going to put the rear suspension in some kind of a bind
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:22 AM   #6
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by low 84
i'm just wondering if this setup is going to put the rear suspension in some kind of a bind
How do you mean?
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:26 AM   #7
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by TIMSPEED
Looks like a good design, but you have to take into consideration the length and angle of the bars, so the imaginary point where they would intersect, is the center of the truck.
what did you just say? that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. he's not linking it, he's just trying to come up with an idea for an anti wrap device. you see similar designs on stupid big lifted trucks with their breakover angle killing ladder bars. that's basically what you're building is a pair of ladder bars.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:29 AM   #8
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1FaastC10
what did you just say? that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. he's not linking it, he's just trying to come up with an idea for an anti wrap device. you see similar designs on stupid big lifted trucks with their breakover angle killing ladder bars. that's basically what you're building is a pair of ladder bars.
I'm sorry, I thought he was building a home-job 4-link. If he's just going to do ladder bars, then there's no reason in making that crossmember, just attach them to the inner frame rails.
BTW: I thought I read somewhere, that when you make a link type traction adder, that you want the imaginery point where the bars would intersect, to be at the center of your vehicle...I could be wrong though, lemme see if I can't find what I"m talking about...
EDIT: This is what I was talking about, read the overview 4-Link
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here

Last edited by TIMSPEED; 01-19-2005 at 12:32 AM.
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:37 AM   #9
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
instant center, and the center of the vehicle have NOTHING to do with one another. the link you showed is for a 4 link kit. Ryan is NOT putting a 4 link on his truck. as for no reason to make the crossmember, i whole heartedly disagree. there is no sufficient place to mount them inside the rails. the rails are C shaped. might try a little reading, other than the Summit catalog, theirs WAY more information out there than they want you to know about, so you waste money on their products.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 03:49 AM   #10
Fatblock82
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Talking

http://www.hotrodsandhemis.com/traction1.html Not sure it worked,but here's a link to a very effective and inexpensive device to stop wheelhop and help traction.I made a set for my V8 S10,and for the money,I prefer them over a four link.The four link works better,but not that much.
Fatblock82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 08:31 AM   #11
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
looks reminiscent of the trailing arms on 67-72 2wds, exept they used coils.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 01:47 PM   #12
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1FaastC10
there is no sufficient place to mount them inside the rails. the rails are C shaped.
Sorry Jeremy, you're right, I had a brainfart there for a second. Dunno why I was thinking that...but you could always box the frame in, right where you want your links to connect. I think your idea is pretty cool Ryan, as a matter of fact, I may try to make the same type of thing, if I go back to the track with the drag radials and it STILL doesn't hook very well...
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 02:14 PM   #13
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
Ryan, maybe its just an oversite in your AutoCad drawing... but do you plan on mounting the bars on top or below the axle... not that i have any personal experience but on top would do much better controlling the axle wrap as the springs on connected and the bottom and the top of the axle would be the part rotating. The set up certainly sounds easy enough to make. good luck and keep us posted.

what version of Autocad do you have?
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call

Last edited by Prerunner1982; 01-19-2005 at 09:57 PM.
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 04:03 PM   #14
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
You could just buy the tube and have it tapped by a local machine shop then get your bar ends from suicidedoors. Personally I wouldn't use heims I would use bushed rod ends, they are much more forgiving to daily driving.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 04:15 PM   #15
BaggedC10
Under construction!
 
BaggedC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,065
Looks good, Ryan. I would install a custom X-member (As pictured) using round tubing. Izzy brings up a good point about using heim joints but if it's not/wont be your DD, go for it.
__________________
2001 Silverado bagged on 22's. *Sold*
BaggedC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 04:17 PM   #16
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiveeightchevy
You could just buy the tube and have it tapped by a local machine shop then get your bar ends from suicidedoors. Personally I wouldn't use heims I would use bushed rod ends, they are much more forgiving to daily driving.
DITTO 10 times over.

I am sure you have all heard me say this 1000 times, but......

Ryan, if you want THE best traction aid to stop wheel hop get Caltracs. They have them for your application. No reason to reinvent the wheel. The Part number is 3204 for a 73-87 with a flip kit: http://www.calvertracing.com/app/app.htm They can also custom build them to any application

If you want some personal experiences with this talk to the 454SS.com guys.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 06:01 PM   #17
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
I agree with Chris, on the CalTrac's, a friend of mine has them on his 68 Camaro, and they really DO work! I just wonder how much a set costs for our truck, as well as I'd like to see what they look like for our truck...
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 07:25 PM   #18
bigblock73
yeller
 
bigblock73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 13,826
Ryan, your idea sounds great, and if you want to keep cost low I say go for it. I agree with Chris, Cal-tracs are the way to go, but they also cost upwards of $300 last time I checked.

BTW - I have never seen a square diff pumpkin before...is that a new HP version? j/k man.
bigblock73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 09:48 PM   #19
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
jon - i am using 2000 version, and pm me on the other

chris - i have asked a few times if there were caltracs made for our trucks that work with a flip kit and no one knew of any. thanks for that link, i may just go that route.

jeff - thats my new currie center section, they are suposed to be indestructable, lol


i'm considering going with the caltracs now that i know they make them for flip kits, but its about 3 times the cost of what i think i can build the bars for, if i do build them i'll take your guys sugestion and go with bushings, i didn't realize that heims would be so bad
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 09:54 PM   #20
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
not more movement than they would be doing the bushings would be cheaper as well...
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2005, 10:24 AM   #21
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
4 poly threaded rod ends- $16/each
8 link tabs- $5.99/each
Price of the tubing- ??

Or you could buy 2 round link bars from SD for $49.99 and get the tabs from them as well.

You could also talk to outlawcrewcab on FSC, he makes the same stuff as SD and may be cheaper since he's in DFW.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2005, 02:58 PM   #22
Fatblock82
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Take a look at the link I posted above,It's the cal trac design.I built mine for under a $100.The heim joints are the only thing that's a little pricey
Fatblock82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2005, 11:04 PM   #23
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatblock82
Take a look at the link I posted above,It's the cal trac design.I built mine for under a $100.The heim joints are the only thing that's a little pricey
the link you posted doesn't work for me
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 03:47 AM   #24
Fatblock82
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Crap,sorry about that.Sorry I'm computer stupid,but if you can find that site,it's a really cool setup that I've had great luck with.I found it using the google search:Cal Tracs
Fatblock82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 03:48 AM   #25
Fatblock82
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Or,you can email me at ScreaminS10@aol.com,and I'll email the page to you.
Fatblock82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com