![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
What kind of bags are you guys running when relocating them forward? What air pressure?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA, U.S.A.
Posts: 32
|
I feel the need to make some comments...say what you will to me, but moving the bag up on the trailing arm does not allow you to run less pressure. In fact you will have to run more pressure because the effective spring rate at the axle is decreased as you move the bag up the arm. Effective spring rate (Reff) is calculated as such: Reff = SP x (L1/L2)²; where SP = your spring rate at the bag, L1 = the distance from the trailing arm pivot to the bag (spring), and L2 = the distance from the pivot to the axle centerline. So...Spring Rate has to increase as you move the bag closer to the pivot.
Why not use air-bag over shocks like the shockwaves and mount them directly off of the back of the trailing arms? This would allow you to run low spring rates and actually give you a slight mechanical advantage over the axle.
__________________
'68 Chevy Stepside in Frame-up Restoration process. 292 CID Clifford Performance Modified T56 6-speed Tranny Slammed, Custom IFS and IRS Money?...Too Much! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Progress = 0%
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
|
Quote:
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 256
|
Yeah, this is just my play toy. I could careless if it rides like ****...... as long as look good
![]() ![]()
__________________
66 C10 (under construction) 1.5" crossmember drop 2" Z'ed frame 8" rear notch Watts-link Bagged DJM 3" spindles Last edited by DM310; 05-11-2005 at 05:10 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mohnton
Posts: 87
|
Cantlever suspensions ride very nice better than over the axle, Also running big wheels, lift is needed, True it adds more stress to the arms but if you brace it correctly there is no problem. Shock waves are nice but i heard that they get less lift than firestones(about 7). Its really up to the person and what they are looking for. Air over coil suspension is 100 percent better. Theres so many different variations of rear systems and what you're looking to do. When I did mine i wanted both a nice ride and lift. I have a longbed and in pennsylvania the roads SUCK. Getting extra lift in the back is good for me and my roll pan, plus its a coolness factor to take the plate from sitting on the ground to almost 26in in the air. As for bags Im running Slam specialties. I like them, little more but well worth it. Well thats my two cents, And my opinion...So its really up to the owner.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Mike
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mohnton
Posts: 87
|
I'm glad i'm not the only one. Even pulling in and out of some places
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 64
|
Ummm Ok
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
|
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Nothing clever
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kailua HI
Posts: 828
|
some people consider this art!
![]() I know I can't "paint" and "sculpt" like any of these guys!
__________________
Got "the Midas Touch!" Last edited by cojnit; 05-16-2005 at 11:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|