The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2005, 07:07 PM   #1
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroppedChoppedPanel
also, mountin your bags further up on the trailing arms allows you to get the same amount of lift with less air pressure meaning a softer smoother ride at the same height
This sounds good in theory but I think alot depends on what manufacturers bags your running. My 68 is not bagged w/the intent of planting the framerails @ shows. It's set up to be low all the time & add air when it's time to pull a trailer. That being said, when I'm just cruizing around town w/no load/trailer, about 30psi of pressure is as low as I want to get because the ride starts getting significantly more bouncy. At 30psi in the dbl. convoluted 224c Firestones, my rear end housing is up inside the space originally occupied by the bottom of the frame rail. 35-40psi seems about optimum w/no weight & when loaded I run about 60-70psi.

What kind of bags are you guys running when relocating them forward? What air pressure?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 03:29 PM   #2
ehjorten
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA, U.S.A.
Posts: 32
I feel the need to make some comments...say what you will to me, but moving the bag up on the trailing arm does not allow you to run less pressure. In fact you will have to run more pressure because the effective spring rate at the axle is decreased as you move the bag up the arm. Effective spring rate (Reff) is calculated as such: Reff = SP x (L1/L2)²; where SP = your spring rate at the bag, L1 = the distance from the trailing arm pivot to the bag (spring), and L2 = the distance from the pivot to the axle centerline. So...Spring Rate has to increase as you move the bag closer to the pivot.

Why not use air-bag over shocks like the shockwaves and mount them directly off of the back of the trailing arms? This would allow you to run low spring rates and actually give you a slight mechanical advantage over the axle.
__________________
'68 Chevy Stepside in Frame-up Restoration process.
292 CID Clifford Performance Modified
T56 6-speed Tranny
Slammed, Custom IFS and IRS
Money?...Too Much!
ehjorten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 04:03 PM   #3
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
Quote:
I feel the need to make some comments...say what you will to me, but moving the bag up on the trailing arm does not allow you to run less pressure.
Thank you.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 04:57 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehjorten
I feel the need to make some comments...say what you will to me, but moving the bag up on the trailing arm does not allow you to run less pressure. In fact you will have to run more pressure because the effective spring rate at the axle is decreased as you move the bag up the arm. Effective spring rate (Reff) is calculated as such: Reff = SP x (L1/L2)²; where SP = your spring rate at the bag, L1 = the distance from the trailing arm pivot to the bag (spring), and L2 = the distance from the pivot to the axle centerline. So...Spring Rate has to increase as you move the bag closer to the pivot.

Why not use air-bag over shocks like the shockwaves and mount them directly off of the back of the trailing arms? This would allow you to run low spring rates and actually give you a slight mechanical advantage over the axle.
I think most of the guys that are doing mods like this are all about extreme lift & railing. I don't see any reason for moving them if you're just interested in slight height adjustments for driving down the road.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 05:08 PM   #5
DM310
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 256
Yeah, this is just my play toy. I could careless if it rides like ****...... as long as look good driving down the road then I am ok Plus there is no way you are going to lay frame w/ the airbags in the same location as the stock coils. As soon as I start driving it I will let you guys know how it rides
__________________
66 C10 (under construction)
1.5" crossmember drop
2" Z'ed frame
8" rear notch
Watts-link
Bagged
DJM 3" spindles

Last edited by DM310; 05-11-2005 at 05:10 PM.
DM310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2005, 07:35 AM   #6
1low1967
Registered User
 
1low1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mohnton
Posts: 87
Cantlever suspensions ride very nice better than over the axle, Also running big wheels, lift is needed, True it adds more stress to the arms but if you brace it correctly there is no problem. Shock waves are nice but i heard that they get less lift than firestones(about 7). Its really up to the person and what they are looking for. Air over coil suspension is 100 percent better. Theres so many different variations of rear systems and what you're looking to do. When I did mine i wanted both a nice ride and lift. I have a longbed and in pennsylvania the roads SUCK. Getting extra lift in the back is good for me and my roll pan, plus its a coolness factor to take the plate from sitting on the ground to almost 26in in the air. As for bags Im running Slam specialties. I like them, little more but well worth it. Well thats my two cents, And my opinion...So its really up to the owner.
1low1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2005, 08:19 AM   #7
smokekiki
Mike
 
smokekiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,473
Quote:
I have a longbed and in pennsylvania the roads SUCK
What?You can't be talking about my area of Pa. I need to take the long way around to get to the grocery store,that is 2 miles away,because the road is so bad ,I bottom out in 2 spots if I try to go the speed limit.
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires
smokekiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2005, 11:09 AM   #8
1low1967
Registered User
 
1low1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mohnton
Posts: 87
I'm glad i'm not the only one. Even pulling in and out of some places
1low1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2005, 05:59 PM   #9
jeffnstef
Registered User
 
jeffnstef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 64
Ummm Ok

Quote:
Originally Posted by DM310
Yeah, this is just my play toy. I could careless if it rides like ****
That's retarded ! If you are looking for something that looks cool put you money into art, not build something that is potentially dangerous to others.
jeffnstef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2005, 06:54 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffnstef
That's retarded ! If you are looking for something that looks cool put you money into art, not build something that is potentially dangerous to others.
Different strokes for different folks.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2005, 11:39 PM   #11
cojnit
Nothing clever
 
cojnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kailua HI
Posts: 828
some people consider this art!

I know I can't "paint" and "sculpt" like any of these guys!
__________________
Got "the Midas Touch!"

Last edited by cojnit; 05-16-2005 at 11:40 PM.
cojnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com