The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2005, 03:22 PM   #1
dubya
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 22
Thinking about a TBI option

Holley's TBI page:
http://www.holley.com/types.asp?type=61

My question is why would Holley offer 4 different TBI systems rated solely on HP? Would a TBI itself meter the amount a fuel with the timing of the injector? In my head I imagine that once you calibrate the fuel pressure and injector timings you can make just about any combination work. Is there that much difference between the injector sizes? Aren't they interchangeable.

Sorry I know it's too many question and this board probably isn't the most appropriate
dubya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 03:53 PM   #2
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
Re: Thinking about a TBI option

From my crude understanding, it is based off of the capability of the computer, the size of the injectors (lbs/hr), I seem to remember reading that once the injector is pushing more than 60-70% of its max it actually becomes less efficient at fuel dispersion. Also, the throttle body blades themselves are different sizes (bigger engine, more cfm).
Likely, the designation is more for general guidelines....to base it off of cfm is not the best method, because most people will tend to lean toward bigger is better, and thats not how a fuel injection system works, it reads everything, and then makes the correct decision on how much fuel to deliver....i always thought of tbi as a smart carb, but my buddy prefers toilet bowl injection (step on the gas, and hear it flush)
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008
1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's
1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007
1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006
2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D
My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM!
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 03:57 PM   #3
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
Re: Thinking about a TBI option

also, correct me if I am wrong, but if you are looking at this option, make sure you build the engine first, then install the tbi.....don't take a stock 350, put a 400hp rated tbi on it....and expect results....as far as power goes, people will disagree....but $$$ can often be spent in better places than on a $1,300 tbi setup....but for reliability, throttle response, mpg, and tune-a-bility its not a bad bang for your buck.
I would recommend (if you have a small block) look around for a used setup like this, or try to rig up your own.....people are always selling them on ebay....unless you have an inline 6....then you are on your own to figure it out!
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008
1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's
1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007
1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006
2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D
My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM!
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 04:46 PM   #4
dubya
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 22
Re: Thinking about a TBI option

Thanks - I built up a sbc400, and am running it with my stock 350 intake/carb. It runs like a champ, but was "thinking" about going a TBI route. You're right about the price tag stinking!!
dubya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2005, 05:09 PM   #5
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
Re: Thinking about a TBI option

Just something to think about, in my experience the Holley Pro Injection is not easy to tune with the fuel mapping that it comes with the only way I would consider investing in one I would have to include the cost of the wide band O2 upgrade.
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com