Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-10-2002, 01:04 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Clinton Twp., Michigan
Posts: 321
|
Front springs 6cyl. vs. 8 cyl. type
I have an 81 2WD that originally came with a straight 6 in it I was told, and still has the original front springs. I know at one point GM used different springs on 6 cyl. vehicles vs. the 8's. The 6's were "weaker" pound wise than the V8's. If I install a V8 with these "6 cyl." front springs; how much lower can I except it to sit compared to V8 with V8 front springs? What about ride quality? I wouldn't mind if the front sat alittle lower, as long as the ride isn't too bad.
|
09-10-2002, 11:42 AM | #2 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: May 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 0
|
from what i have always seen from and in actual GM info is that the standard equipment load rating capacity of the springs are the same on all trucks of a particular model and series, makes no mention of any heavier or different springs used with any certain available engine option.
I.E.: C10, K10, C20, K20, C30, K30, G10, G20, G30, P10, P20, P30, R10, R20, R30, K5, etc,etc were the std and the HD and the aux springs that therefore added to, or had higher load rating capacity Last edited by Fast68Chevy; 09-10-2002 at 11:45 AM. |
09-13-2002, 11:34 PM | #3 |
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
|
They aren't different, they are the same. The inline isn't that much lighter just because it has less cylinders, this is just a misconception.
__________________
Chris Lucas 1973 Chevy C-10 1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD 1987 R10 twin turbo LS 1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab 1985 K5 diesel swapped project 1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project Captkaos Customs 73-87chevytrucks.com |
Bookmarks |
|
|