The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2006, 02:18 AM   #1
57sailplane
Senior Member
 
57sailplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 583
i got the ugly on.

this is what i got done today. man what ugly primer.
Attached Images
     
57sailplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 04:30 AM   #2
sixty8c10
MY EX DRIVES A BROOM
 
sixty8c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Herington, KS
Posts: 869
Re: i got the ugly on.

nice
__________________
They say nobody's perfect.
I'm a nobody, so I must be perfect.

Building Nemo -1968 C10 Long Bed

FRED -1947 KB-2 International
sixty8c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 05:15 AM   #3
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: i got the ugly on.

Couple questions on the cage, you consideed a swing out on the drivers side? It is NHRA legal, and WAY easier on you when entering/exiting.
Also, the cross bar on the backside, you won't be able to slide your seat back very far at all.
I'd rather look at/address issues now than after paint.
what is the planned outcome? How fast you goin in this?
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 06:58 PM   #4
57sailplane
Senior Member
 
57sailplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 583
Re: i got the ugly on.

ya i considered the swing out but its not that hard for me to get in. i like the solid cage for stifness. as far as the back bar i originaly had it back near against the rear of the cab but the inspecter said it was not legal cause it would place my head to far under the main hoop. i thought about adding the extra bars to keep the bare back but then it wouldnt look as clean. the cage is nhra certified to go as fast as 8.5 secounds. what really made me mad is i have seen a couple of cars with the seat location well back under the hoop. one care didnt even have a rear seat bar. both were nhra certified. i guess its who you know... anyways its nhra legal and im am only 38yrs old so i probably can put up with the configuration for a while. the only problem as far as comfurt is the throttle angle with my ankle.. its a little much but oh well. as far as how fast, i hope to run in the 9's..
57sailplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 07:08 PM   #5
Malibu 496
Junior Member
 
Malibu 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 159
Re: i got the ugly on.

Looks nice!
Are you keeping the stock rear suspension?
Malibu 496 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 05:36 PM   #6
57sailplane
Senior Member
 
57sailplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 583
Re: i got the ugly on.

yes i am using the stock suspension. although i will be runing coil overs with it and a heavy rear swaybar.. i am going to build my own front mustang II crossmember. i don't think it will be that hard. i have looked into the engineering pretty deeply and have also got many pointers from guys on here on building the front and rear suspension.
57sailplane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com