![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 73
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
after I raised the engine up 3+ inches it is still maybe a 1/2 in below the cross member and it seems like it will need to go up or my driveshaft will be too high.
Quote:
I did not box the frame more than the sections that are near the crossmember, b/c it came w/the kit. I think the bolt it kit give an older appearence. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inglewood, California
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 73
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
![]() ![]() My trans tunnel is what I am worried about now. I think it will go about 1/2 that high and forward another inch or so. I wish GM would get in gear so I could be getting a 6L80 tans ![]() progress is slow but I won a MAP sensor on egay for $16...now I hope it works |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Tripple Five Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 658
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
[QUOTE=Detroit3100;2030536]after I raised the engine up 3+ inches it is still maybe a 1/2 in below the cross member and it seems like it will need to go up or my driveshaft will be too high.
Be carefull with raising the motor that much, you might have issues with the trans tunnel, I have my LS1/4L60e sitting high but it still looks like it's sitting low, I used the original motor mounts but had brackets made which were the same height as the og brackets. Take a look at what I've done so far with my build. http://s4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...Chevy%20Truck/ Kabwe. I meet that guy with the Caddy 2 years ago and that thing was the best car at Route 66, he had a 5.3L setup that he was selling for a great price but I already had my engine/trans already... Hopefully I'll have my truck ready in the next couple months, it's body work time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inglewood, California
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
Kabwe.
I meet that guy with the Caddy 2 years ago and that thing was the best car at Route 66, he had a 5.3L setup that he was selling for a great price but I already had my engine/trans already... Hopefully I'll have my truck ready in the next couple months, it's body work time.[/QUOTE] Yeah Homer is a very nice guy and he has a couple of nice rides, but nothing as nice as that caddy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inglewood, California
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
I checked out you build a while back. I found it on the internet how is it going? any updates?
Last edited by Kabwe; 02-14-2007 at 01:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Tripple Five Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 658
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
Quote:
BTW: Your build is looking good. Is there a preference to using the camaro clip as opposed to the Mustand II? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inglewood, California
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
Quote:
As for the Mustang II vs. Camaro clip there is nothing wrong with either in my opinion. I've done volares, Gm clips, and Mustang II and all are nice if done right with my perference being GM clips and Mustang II. I done the Mustang II this time because of the ease of installation. I had a volare clip on this truck, but when I started thinking I may want to bag the truck later I sold that frame and done the mustang II on my new frame. Last edited by Kabwe; 02-14-2007 at 12:48 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 508
|
Re: 1950 LQ9 conversion
Kawbe,
Would you mind to p.m. me a number I can reach you at? I have some questions about your door rebuild. BTW that truck is looking real good. I have decided to turn mine into a 4-wheel drive instead of the hot rod I first intended on. I love hot rods but I really need a 4-wheel drive also. So I'm going to have the best of both worlds. Thanks again, B.Sharp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|