The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2007, 09:20 PM   #1
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,144
Re: baggin questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom coop View Post
the art arms will give you more drop because the bag bolts right to it. no need for cups
Are you sure about this? If you cut the 'cups' down for the stock a-arms, I believe you'll get as low as ART's arms will.

ART's arms do offer better (updated) geometry vs. stock GM arms though.

Kevncar, 2.5" spindles & bags up front (definitely upgrade to a sway bar w/urethane bushings). Out back, bags, 1.5~2" blocks, relocate the shocks, & some bolt-in c-sections will get you close enough to damage the bed floor w/the bags @ low psi.

The drive shaft will come close to hitting the top of the crossmember but the rear will hit the bed floor first.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 03-30-2007 at 09:27 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com