The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2002, 11:29 PM   #1
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
fuel tank relocate=more leg room???

When you relocate the tank from behind the seat, can you get more leg room??? Being 6'3" im a little cramped..I am going to do it, but if I can tell the wife it will give me more leg room, it'll be an easier sell
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 12:01 AM   #2
Truckstr
Registered User
 
Truckstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee
Posts: 1,372
bigjimzlll,

I'm not far behind you at 6'2" (and a little). I also am looking to move my tank, but not to get more leg room.

The tank in our '67-'72 trucks sits in a little "alcove" behind the seat, below the rear window. Now, I don't know about your seat(s), but mine is all the way back against the metal below the rear window. Unless I move the seat down and then back, then there is no room to move the seat back any farther. Even then, my head would be right against the rear glass. Not a very comfortable or safe proposition.

Ergonomically speaking, it might be feasable to move the leading edge of the seat up, thereby placing the driver in a reclining position and, in turn, allowing one to move their feet further away from the pedals.

I'm going to mock-up a seat profile out of cardboard to allow me to take measurements when I pull my seat out to install the lap belts that I bought the other day for my '67. Basically, I'll make an outline of the existing seat profile and then I'll measure the various ways that I could install the seats or others with similar dimensions.

Then I'll take those measurements and compare them against other seats that I might consider installing. The seats in my '98 Pontiac Bonneville are awesome. Compared to the bench in the '67 they are the difference between night and day. I'd love to have some like them in my '67.

Who knows. Do ya think the wife would notice if I switched 'em?
__________________
Jeff

'67 short Fleet; my ongoing project.
'66 long Fleet; my original "baby."

Live life or bust trying.
Truckstr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 11:19 AM   #3
Canada20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 802
I'm definitely interested in this topic at 6'3". I haven't had a chance to drive my truck yet except for the drive home and then I was more worried about just keeping the damned thing running rather than how close I was to the glass.

It doesn't look to me like you'd gain anything with the tank removal as far as legroom goes and I'm betting that the seat tracks don't go any farther back unless you extend or move them.

Sounds like Trukstr has some good ideas and will be the guy to hit up for info when looking for seats to fit. I wonder if what he's talking about could be accomplished by making the seat tracks higher in the front than in the back? hmmm....but then I guess to notice any real difference you'd have to REALLY raise the front up so maybe that wouldn't work. One other idea (because I'm planning on having a topper on mine) is if you were to get one of the gaskets to go between the cab and the topper with no rear window, then you could recline right into the box. That probably wouldn't work either....I'm just talking out my butt at this point

As for seats, I know our Olds station wagon had a power front bench seat (split) that would tilt back and move up and down; there are probably a bunch of other cars with the same.

bigjimzlll;
if you're looking to try and convince SWMBO that moving the tank out of the cab is a good idea, why not try the safety angle? I know it's only a half truth 'cuz if the tank gets hit IN THE CAB you've probably got pretty big problems at that point anyway but I know when I show SWMBO the media hyped horror stories about the drop in fuel tanks in vintage mustangs, she's suddenly pretty interested in things like fuels cells and trunk armour. I might have a link to a nice juicy story or 2 if you're interested.


Greg
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question, right?
Canada20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 04:55 PM   #4
bigvinnie
Registered User
 
bigvinnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: escondido, ca 92026
Posts: 1,222
once the tank is out, you've got about 8 inches of space from the back of the cab to the bench seat bottom.... problem is that the seat back is already touching the back of the cab in this position, and moving the seat any further back would put the seat back in a more vertical position or even worse, forcing you to lean forward.... not too comfy.

The seat is already vertical enough in my opinion (I'm 6-4), so I figure I'll have to live with not being able to fully extend my legs. Only other alternative is to find seats with super thin seat backs that would give you a couple extra inches to work with, and maintain a comfortable seating angle.
__________________
'72 short step, 350, 700R4, tilt, ps, pdb, a/c, lowered coils, etc., other work in progress... San Diego, CA

72 Stepside Project
bigvinnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 08:02 PM   #5
tom hand
CCRider
 
tom hand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Olive Branch,MS,USA
Posts: 2,232
I don't see how you tall guys can stand these trucks. I'm only 5'9 and I wish I could move the seat back another notch. Moving the tank will buy you nothing as far as moving the seat back. I have heard of tall people spacing the seat up, but I don't think you could go very far with that before your head hits the roof. Now here's an idea if you want to do some major surgery. Cut the firewall and move the pedals forward. If you were doing a major restro and had the truck apart anyway it would not be that much more work. Just an idea.
__________________
72 GMC Sierra SWB almost finished---- 84 Softail
Olive Branch MS
tom hand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 08:21 PM   #6
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Yup....Im 5 ft 9 also, & with a 4" chop on the top headroom is very limited! I feel for you guys that bump your heads on everything. Hell I always thought I was too short, but me old dad asked me if my feet touched the ground..... they do most of the time
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2002, 11:53 PM   #7
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
When I removed the tank from mine, I thought like you did that I would get more leg room. NOT! Like BV said, the angle is what determines the leg room. In order to get more leg room, I'm going to have to extend the back of the cab. This is already in the plan, but I don't know when it will happen. I put aftermarket Steel Horse seats in and they are still at an angle I'm not fully comfortable with. On the trip from Chicago to WA, it was almost painful. If it hadn't been for the cruise control I probably would have ripped out the drivers seat and sat on a milk crate. Jeff.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2002, 12:10 AM   #8
neonlarry
Registered User
 
neonlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,746
I can't see that moving the tank out of the cab would make a difference in leg room either. The things that I did that really helped were to get the bench seat from a 92 chevy(the back in maybe an inch thinner) and replace the steering wheel with one from a 79 camaro. The other thing that might help would be to replace the gas pedal assembly with one from a 71 or 72 truck.
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights
99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs
95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI
neonlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2002, 12:14 AM   #9
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
I guess the point is moot....In the 2 1/2 years that ive owned the truck, Ive put 2500 miles on it...Im really not sitting in it that long..lol
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com