|
04-15-2007, 01:56 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: No. Calif.
Posts: 17
|
coilover vs. must.ll
Looking for anyone out there with knowledge of the differences in handling of these set-ups?
|
|
|
|
04-16-2007, 10:09 AM
|
#2 |
|
polishing a turd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 674
|
Re: coilover vs. must.ll
do you mean coil-over vs. non-coil over on a mustang 2?
the spring rates and shock valving would be the main factor. the main benefit of coil-overs is adjustable ride height, and a wide range of spring rates available
__________________
59 chevy apache 31 4x4 - my project: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8668512 53 buick special - straight 8 sled - blow through turbo 47 gmc - flatbed hot rod build 99 ford econoline e350 - 4x4 converted family roadtrip/overlanding rig AKA 'Monstervan' AKA 'Daddy-Van' |
|
|
|
|
04-16-2007, 04:21 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Agua Dulce, Ca. usa
Posts: 179
|
Re: coilover vs. must.ll
Quote:
The adjustable ride hight would be nice since I put a mustang II on my 50 F1 ford and after a few years and settling it sits too low. I will probably go with air air ride suspension that replaces the spring and shock for the adjustability. Air ride was not an a practicle option about 6 years ago. I do say that the mustang II has a great ride as it is now. But it doesn't do well going down my dirt road that low to the ground. Ed ke6bnl My 53 chevy is going with a 85 S10 frame swap when time permits.
__________________
Ed ke6bnl Agua Dulce 70 S.E. Los Angeles 70 Chevy short bed 1948 F3 ford pu 1949 F1 stock V8 flathead 3 on floor 1950 F1 pu street rod 1948 F6 Ford Dually/350sbc no bed stock trans&rear 1972 El Camino 4" chop 1953 Chevy 3100 2b daily driver 1970 SB 4X4 400ci 6in lift |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
