|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-09-2007, 03:55 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
|
Turbo 350 vs. Turbo 400 crossmember
Are the cross members different? or is it just a matter of the mounting holes for the cross member being further back on the frame ?
|
|
|
|
10-09-2007, 05:30 PM
|
#2 |
|
Right turn Clyde
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,911
|
Re: Turbo 350 vs. Turbo 400 crossmember
Crossmembers are the same. It will need to be moved to mount up with the trans mount. You may also need to drill a hole or two. I had three line up on mine when I went to a th400 from a th350.
__________________
1974 C25 LWB: 454 4bbl Carb / TH400 / 3.73 1992 Camaro RS 305 TBI |
|
|
|
|
10-09-2007, 05:35 PM
|
#3 |
|
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
|
Re: Turbo 350 vs. Turbo 400 crossmember
Same exact crossmember, different locatin. The 400 is about 5-11/16" longer to the mount.
__________________
Chris Lucas 1973 Chevy C-10 1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD 1987 R10 twin turbo LS 1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab 1985 K5 diesel swapped project 1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project Captkaos Customs 73-87chevytrucks.com |
|
|
|
|
10-09-2007, 05:52 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
|
Re: Turbo 350 vs. Turbo 400 crossmember
Thanks guys. The RPO sheet on my truck indicated that the truck originally came with a Turbo 400 but when I bought it, it had a Turbo 350. I was looking to install a 700R4 or 2004R which uses basically the same cross member location and if the holes are already there then thats one less thing I have to worry about. I'll have to get under the truck sometime and see what I got.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
