The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2007, 10:03 AM   #1
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,437
preferred front drop parts

I am seeing mention of dropped lower control arms, some tubular and some modded stockers of 1 1/2" to 3" drops. These with stock springs should ride ok. What about front end alignment or ball joint wear concerns? These should only be used with large diameter wheels to keep the scrub line above the rim edge right?
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver
primer is finer
91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2007, 12:31 AM   #2
RunninLo
3DrDwn--the 'burb not the band
 
RunninLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 598
Re: preferred front drop parts

all of the quality drop specific parts are to correct geommetry and tire wear issues. We all know that you can get low cheap with a die grinder or torch to the springs.
Cheap+Low= bumpy ride/tire wear. Depending on how low you want to go will determine what parts or combo of parts to use.
2-3" can be done with EITHER spindles,drop/stepped LCA's, or drop coils. you shouldn't combine spindles AND drop/sterpped LCA's with stock diameter wheels because the lower ball joint will contact the ground in the event of a flat. Certain States have "Scrub Line" laws that require the wheel to be the lowest contact point of the vehicle.
4+" will require a combo of spindles and coils/ bags or possibly a frame "Z".

I'm running spindles/bags and ART strong arms on mine All installed of the world famous DropMember. The Strong arms don't actually drop the rig by themselves but correct ball joint placement and angle to eliminate bind.

The set-up should allow a smooth ride with good handling and excellent wear of all parts and tires. It's only downside is it definately wasn't cheap.

Not sure if I provided the answers you were looking for or not... I tend to get long winded and off topic..... anyway I hope this helped.

Josh
__________________
Slo and Lo that is the tempo.
'72 burb build page here:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=259256

'89 GMC Dually crew build page coming soon.
88 4x4 crew DD

duallys past/present pics here:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post4001246

89 1 ton Dually rear flip kit install here:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=354327
RunninLo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com