The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2008, 03:47 AM   #1
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

I know that a set of 4 link bars will make one hook-up under power. The trailing arms have been used in Nascar and truck for years. Can anyone help me with making the arms work or just save time and use what I know that will work and I know how to do the 4 link.
__________________
OLDIRONRACING
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 05:30 AM   #2
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Adjustable shocks will help if you are street driving and racing. That way you can soften the compression of the rears and the jounce of the fronts for weight transfer when racing, then switch it back to be drivable on the street.

Last edited by LONGHAIR; 01-06-2008 at 05:31 AM.
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 06:23 AM   #3
PrerunnerRob
Registered User
 
PrerunnerRob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 847
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

That really depends on what you are trying to accomplish, but I'd go the 4 link route for most aplications.
PrerunnerRob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 04:55 PM   #4
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Question Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Come on guys I need help with these. What is some of the things ya'll have tried. Show me or tell me ..... Need the input........ Do I use the old trailing arms or build new ones? If I need to build new ones show me some of the ones ya;ll have built or give ideas.......
__________________
OLDIRONRACING

Last edited by Oldironracing; 01-09-2008 at 04:59 PM.
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 05:34 PM   #5
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Oldiron-

My recommendation on which way to go would depend on what your trying to accomplish. Are you looking for a comfortable ride; trying to putt gobbs of power to the pavement; trying to get it as low as possible; wanting something that'll take corners well????? Let us know what you want it to do and we can better help you!
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 05:58 PM   #6
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Question Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

I wont it to take lots of power to out run the (buddy's 68 Chevy c/10 502 blower motor) and ride nice for that Saturday night cruse on the river market. Don't have a problem building a 4 link set up if thats the way to go. Just won't to do it right the first time.
__________________
OLDIRONRACING

Last edited by Oldironracing; 01-09-2008 at 05:58 PM.
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 06:08 PM   #7
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldironracing View Post
I wont it to take lots of power to out run the (buddy's 68 Chevy c/10 502 blower motor) and ride nice for that Saturday night cruse on the river market. Don't have a problem building a 4 link set up if thats the way to go. Just won't to do it right the first time.
I would recommend buying a nice set of adjustable coil-overs (as previously mentioned) and adapting them to your trailing arm suspension. The trailing arms can be made to work extremely well.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 10:06 PM   #8
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

There are a few guys on this site using the stock style rear suspension going real fast. By that I mean 9's and 10's. I'm on stock style rear suspension and recently clicked off a 12.33 @ 110 on the motor with a 1.87 60' dead hooked. I'm making some changes, shooting for 11.9x on the motor. I think with the bigger verter going in it might help get the 60' to high 1.6's to low 1.7's.

I'm running Competition Engineering 3-way adjustables all the way around. The front spring I swapped out for a HAL 14" 350lb spring. It stores a lot more energy than the lowering springs I had. The rear spring is a classic performance 2" lowering spring.

I'm also switching the rear tire from a 275/50/15 BFG drag radial to a 315/60/15 in hopes to hook it on the street a little better. I'll take that combo to the track with the bottle open before making a gear change.

Last edited by Super73; 01-09-2008 at 10:08 PM.
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 07:53 AM   #9
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

To get trailing arm trucks to plant, you can: play w/spring rates, adjust the pinion angle, use the widest possible tires, swap in urethane bushings in the front trailing arm mounts, use front springs that quickly release stored energy (think Moroso 'trick' front springs), use drag/launch oriented shocks & shift weight from the nose to the rear bed area and put the truck on a diet.

The key when trying to launch big power is tuning for traction. Since most of these items will also apply when swapping in a 4-link, why not start w/these things & see how well the truck arms work.

An old buddy had a 427ci BBC w/a T400 & plate system in a 66 short fleet truck & achieved 1.6X 60's. Not too shabby for what it was.....

Super73, list your set-up (CID, heads, cam, intake, exhaust, trans type, gear ratio, power adder if any, tire/wheel sizes & compound, truck weight, list weight reductions if any, & any tuning performed.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-10-2008 at 07:57 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 10:01 AM   #10
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

There is a new section on the board that is hidden under engin called Racing/Dyno Section. It's intended for the racers on the board to discuss set ups, what works for them / doesn't ect. You can find my whole set up there.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/f...splay.php?f=60

In short though it's a LS1 powered 63 pick up that weighs 3,840 with me in it and makes 430rwhp on the motor.

I'm sure some of the faster guys will start chiming in soon..
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 10:56 AM   #11
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super73 View Post
There is a new section on the board that is hidden under engin called Racing/Dyno Section. It's intended for the racers on the board to discuss set ups, what works for them / doesn't ect. You can find my whole set up there.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/f...splay.php?f=60

In short though it's a LS1 powered 63 pick up that weighs 3,840 with me in it and makes 430rwhp on the motor.

I'm sure some of the faster guys will start chiming in soon..
Huh... Didn't know about the racing/dyno section. I'll take a look.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 05:58 PM   #12
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Thumbs up Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

OK , I'm going to use the trailing arms with coil overs. I won't to make new trailing arms. What are the rest of you guys using to do these with? If you have any pictures or details you can share that would be great.
__________________
OLDIRONRACING
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 07:34 PM   #13
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldironracing View Post
OK , I'm going to use the trailing arms with coil overs. I won't to make new trailing arms. What are the rest of you guys using to do these with? If you have any pictures or details you can share that would be great.
Why the need for new arms? Or is it just a want?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2008, 07:49 PM   #14
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

I'm using the factory arms with factory bushings right now. The problem I see with using a square tube [] and poly bushing is they won't allow twist like the current design ][ If twist is not allowed in the arms and/or bushing then your going to run in to a suspension bind issue.
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 03:50 AM   #15
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

OK,OK, Its just a want. But the tube ones look cool. No need I guess. What bushing is the best to use? What do I need to look for on the old trailing arms to see if there usable? What coil over and spring rat should I use?
__________________
OLDIRONRACING

Last edited by Oldironracing; 01-13-2008 at 04:00 AM.
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 07:04 AM   #16
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldironracing View Post
OK,OK, Its just a want. But the tube ones look cool. No need I guess. What bushing is the best to use? What do I need to look for on the old trailing arms to see if there usable? What coil over and spring rat should I use?
I think minimizing inconsistency is a primary goal so maybe get some urethane bushings from Energy Suspension.

As far as the arms themselves, check for signs of rot around the bolt holes & down the seam of the arm. If it looks like theres a gap between each of the arm 'halves' @ any point in their length, get different ones.

To beef things up w/o adding extra bulk, I run 2" weld beads approx every 10~12" down the center of the arms (top & bottom) starting just an inch or so from the front bushing sleeve. I also weld up the very rear of the arm from top to bottom.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-13-2008 at 07:05 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 10:27 AM   #17
Tony@AirRideTech
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huntingburg IN
Posts: 620
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

yup..... I would stick with the trailing arms and I would also put it on air..... it will give you much more tune-ability for both drag and street. Depending on how much power you are putting down you may want o consider going to a tubular arm or boxing yours.
Tony@AirRideTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 11:14 AM   #18
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony@AirRideTech View Post
yup..... I would stick with the trailing arms and I would also put it on air..... it will give you much more tune-ability for both drag and street. Depending on how much power you are putting down you may want o consider going to a tubular arm or boxing yours.
Tubular (or equivalent) if new arms are needed. Boxing adds weight which is something C-10 trucks don't need. Keep in mind that simple plating like the factory 3/4 ton trucks works well (like ECE's trailing arm reinforcement kit).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-13-2008 at 11:14 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 07:55 AM   #19
Oldironracing
Registered User
 
Oldironracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Arkansas
Posts: 250
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

I have seen some on hear that is made out of tubing. Cant find them again to see what there making them out of. I think I'm going to use coil overs that are adjustably. I have some coil over springs left over from running the race car that I can use. Just don,t know what rate to start with (350lb or 375lb)??
__________________
OLDIRONRACING
Oldironracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 10:05 AM   #20
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: Trailing Arms vs 4 Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldironracing View Post
I have seen some on hear that is made out of tubing. Cant find them again to see what there making them out of. I think I'm going to use coil overs that are adjustably. I have some coil over springs left over from running the race car that I can use. Just don,t know what rate to start with (350lb or 375lb)??
Coil-overs work well too but air bags shouldn't be dismissed as they offer easy tunability just by adding some air pressure. Once upon a time when I had CO's on my 67, I remember the spring rate being much lower (175~200#). I can't say if that was optimum since the truck only made it around the driveway several times before coming back apart for a frame off. I'm sure some others will chime in about optimum rates or you could try the race section in the engine/drivetrain forum.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com