The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2008, 08:48 AM   #1
marvxyz1
Registered User
 
marvxyz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 106
lockup converter

I have a 1980 GMC, six auto 350 trans. and I don't believe I have a lockup converter on my truck, my question is, would there be any benefit in having one? Obviously, I don't race or anythin. I would only be looking for improved gas mileage. thanks for any possible useful info. on this...marvxyz1
marvxyz1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2008, 03:33 PM   #2
Slonaker
Insert Witty Text Here
 
Slonaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
Re: lockup converter

The lockup converter allows you to turn a few RPM less at cruising speed. It removes the slippage that is built into automatic transmissions that allows you to stay in gear when stopped. It saves gas rather than being a performance thing.

I have no idea if it was offered in 1980 or on 6 cylinder trucks. You can tell if you have one by looking at the transmission. If it has the lockup torque converter, there will be an extra electrical connector on the transmission. It is square, maybe a little over an inch on each side, and has spots on it for a 4 wire connection, one of which is unused.

I can't remember which side it is on (I haven't looked at mine in years), but it plugs in low on the transmission, and comes straight down into the connector.

Slonaker
__________________
'86 Chevy C10 (Sold 04/19/13 )
Stock '01 Silverado
Slonaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2008, 03:47 PM   #3
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: lockup converter

A lockup will save you 200-300 RPMs. That's a lot of RPMs. The lockup is known as poor man's overdrive. So yes, a lock converter will increase MPG.

The plug is on the driverside.
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 02:23 AM   #4
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: lockup converter

The 350s with the lockup converters were listed as 350C trannys. There were a lot of them in the mid eighties, but I don't think they went back to 1980. They are a fairly good tranny, but many were taken out of the trucks and pitched, since the output shaft on them were of a smaller design. If you are going that route, I would look for a later model 700R4 and get the fourth gear Overdrive as well as the lock up and not to mention the lower ratioed first gear.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 04:30 AM   #5
D13
Registered User
 
D13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
Re: lockup converter

It will help only if you drive hghway a lot. Assuming this is a 1/2 ton w/250, the axle ratio won't let you drive lin lockup below 50mph or so. [I]f you have a 292 you probably can get away with it. But finding one is hard, finding someone to properly rebuild one is harder, and finding a good converter is $$$. You'd be better off swapping in a 200-4R out of a V-8 car. But the key is to remember your cruising RPM needs to be around 1600-2000 or else it'll start bucking under load.
D13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:25 AM   #6
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: lockup converter

You don't need an electrical connection for a lockup. Aftermarket torque converters will lock up. I ran the previous 700R4 rebuild and the current rebuild without electrical lockup. The previous convert locked up at 1800 RPMs. I'm not sure so on the current one. The stall is 2500 but I'm almost sure at low cruise speeds the stall is lower.
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com