The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2008, 09:07 AM   #1
1980GMC
Registered User
 
1980GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
Is the frame supposed to be like this???

I dont have a pictures so Ill try to describe it as best as possible.

About 7" behind the tranny crossmember on the drivers side the frame looks funky. By funky I mean not this shape --> ] Its like the bottom flat part of the rail just sags.

Its not damaged, it looks like it was made that way which puzzles me.

Excuse the crudeness of this drawing but my camera isnt working.




Thanks for all the help,

Wes
__________________
Wes
1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD
1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD
1980GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:23 AM   #2
pcmcobra
Registered User
 
pcmcobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,684
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

yes
__________________
1986 C10 SWB 6.0/6l90e

Miami...Flee it like a native
pcmcobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:23 AM   #3
pissonNOS
senior member
 
pissonNOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

i believe this was catalytic converts? i could be wrong tho
__________________
69 GMC bagged
pissonNOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:24 AM   #4
f.monroe
Senior Member
 
f.monroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Caldwell,Tx.
Posts: 3,648
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

That is correct . I think GM got lazy or something around 1980 or so and the driver side frame rail looks like that . Looks weak to me also but I have seen Many trucks like that . Must be some sort of crumple zone built into the frame to aid in a crash . Frank
__________________
Born and proudly residing in a Red State !
f.monroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:25 AM   #5
flamingbig10
6.0 powered square
 
flamingbig10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mesquite texas
Posts: 3,459
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1980GMC View Post
I dont have a pictures so Ill try to describe it as best as possible.

About 7" behind the tranny crossmember on the drivers side the frame looks funky. By funky I mean not this shape --> ] Its like the bottom flat part of the rail just sags.

Its not damaged, it looks like it was made that way which puzzles me.

Excuse the crudeness of this drawing but my camera isnt working.




Thanks for all the help,

Wes
Mines a 80 also and its the same way,
__________________
Aaron
1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot
Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326
flamingbig10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:30 AM   #6
ElGracho
Gentleman Jim Driver
 
ElGracho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 1,550
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

It's not that GM was lazy. If they were lazy, they wouldn't build a die to bend a straight frame.

The bend is there to give clearance the for the catalytic converter. The original GM pellet type converters were huge and got really hot. The bend was to keep that section of frame away from the cat.

My 75 Gentleman Jim has it all the way up to the 87 diesel I used to have (even though it didn't have a cat, the frame was the same as the rest...)
__________________
Joe
'75 GMC Gentleman Jim
'84 Chev C10 Short Wide - Super duper plain (manual steering, manual brakes, no dome light, no cig lighter)
'85 Chev C10 Short Wide - Super plain Vortec 4.8 4L60E trans
also: '81 K30, '83 C30 Crew Dually, '84 M1028 CUCV, '85 M1009 CUCV, another '85 C10 SWB, '89 R3500 Flatbed
ElGracho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:36 AM   #7
1980GMC
Registered User
 
1980GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

Thanks for all the quick replies everyone.

So if I ever wanted to lay frame would I have to bend that? or leave it?
__________________
Wes
1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD
1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD

Last edited by 1980GMC; 03-04-2008 at 09:49 AM.
1980GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:48 AM   #8
Dinos63
chevy only
 
Dinos63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,619
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

That was a good question, and good answer, when i got mine we thought it was hit or pulled out of ditch, we had to heat it and flatin it out when we lowered it
__________________
CHEVY ONLY... Nothin Else !
Dinos63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 09:58 AM   #9
1980GMC
Registered User
 
1980GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???

Haha I assumed the same about mine and was wondering if there was something I wasnt told about by the PO.

Thanks for all the help everyone.
__________________
Wes
1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD
1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD
1980GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com