Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-16-2008, 01:02 AM | #1 |
Tasty Cakes!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 2,112
|
StrongArms? Cool Ride?
So I saw the thread by Shifty about the good price on StrongArms. Got me thinking that I could probably afford them. So now I have a couple of questions...
A) If I'm doing just a "regular" bag setup on the front of my '67, ie no crossmember drop or dropmember, will I need (or want) the extra camber adjustment that the StrongArms provide? B) If I do go the StrongArm direction, I noticed that it is only $200 more for the full Cool Ride setup for my truck. The Cool Ride setup comes with shocks, a relocated shock mount, bags, and bag mounts. That would be cheaper than buying the StrongArms and piecing the rest of the front setup together. Is there any reason not to go with the full Cool Ride kit??
__________________
I'm a little and a lot Ground beef: A cow with no legs. ---------------- '66 Chevy SWB "Penny" '67 Chevy Big Window SWB- aka "Pearl" '72 Burb- "Betty" "It's not a hearse dammit" '99 Chevy Ext. cab Silverado |
03-16-2008, 01:08 AM | #2 |
Too many projects
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fargo, ND land of the flat hills
Posts: 1,147
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
I'll take a whack at A)
A cross member drop and/or dropmember don't really factor into the camber correction here, as they move the entire suspension up into the frame rails, regardless of where the a-arms are. I just completed a 2" cross member drop with stock arms, but the tubular arms would be nice. If your regular bag setup is to get the front cross member on the ground, you could use improved camber, but it is not absolutely necessary to get the cross member on the ground. I found that the stock arms don't give great amounts of negative camber when aired out (compared to some late model trucks), and that's not where I plan to drive, so I believe stock arms can suffice. Just my 1.5 cents, and I believe there are a few threads discussing the arms further (and more technically), I just don't remember their location at the moment, but if you search you should be able to find them.
__________________
Andrew 84 GMC C1500 SWB 6.2 Diesel/700R4/3.42 "Grandpa's odd duck" |
03-16-2008, 02:10 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW area
Posts: 104
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
Riveted1 - I'm right there with you. Its almost a no-brainer to go for the coolride add-on at only +$200. I've been researching the same thing and had the same questions you just asked, but thought of a couple more:
Are there bags available that would ride better, perform better, last longer, etc... than the bags that are in the strongarm kit with coolride? (that are reasonably priced) How much suspension travel does the strongarm / coolride bags setup provide? Would other bags offer better range of travel with the strong arms.
__________________
Richard 1970 Chevy (growing pile of parts) 2003 Silverado SS |
03-16-2008, 03:25 AM | #4 |
Tasty Cakes!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 2,112
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
Lowrollin,
Yes, you are correct about the crossmember drop/Dropmember. I posted that thread kind of quickly... I just want to put the crossmember on the ground (or so.) So what you are saying is that it's not necessary, but would be nice to have the extra camber adjustment. But I guess the question is, is it worth >$700 for a weekend cruiser? BigTex, Out of all of the posts I've read, most ppl say to go with the Slam Specialties RE7 bags. They say they don't have problems "ballooning" and they come with an internal bump stop. IIRC, the Cool Ride kit uses Firestone bags. But I would suspect that ART has their s**t together, and don't know if this is enough reason to spend the extra money for the SS bags/KP brackets/shocks, etc. If I don't go w/the StrongArms at all, I will probably just go with the SS bags, brackets, etc from KP.
__________________
I'm a little and a lot Ground beef: A cow with no legs. ---------------- '66 Chevy SWB "Penny" '67 Chevy Big Window SWB- aka "Pearl" '72 Burb- "Betty" "It's not a hearse dammit" '99 Chevy Ext. cab Silverado |
03-16-2008, 03:34 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW area
Posts: 104
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
That brings up one other thought I had with the "complete" cool ride kit: shocks -are these any good? Looking at airrides site, they offer adjustable valved shocks as options for the coolride kit. You cant get those from stylin trucks site.
__________________
Richard 1970 Chevy (growing pile of parts) 2003 Silverado SS |
03-16-2008, 05:35 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
the short version:
A: NO B: YES The standard shocks that come with the kit will be monroe's. They are good shocks for bagged suspensions. You probably would not notice a difference between the firestone bags that come with the kit vs. the more popular Slam Specialty bags. If you have the dough, GO FOR IT! Last edited by jlaird; 03-16-2008 at 05:36 AM. |
03-16-2008, 05:38 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: StrongArms? Cool Ride?
Apparently Firestone bags also have the internal bumpstops which is why their minimum height is listed @ 3".
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
Bookmarks |
|
|