The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2003, 12:02 PM   #1
TC70C10
Registered User
 
TC70C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Harvest, AL 35749
Posts: 337
Survey: the best shocks for my K5 4X4

I've got an 81 K5 Blazer with dual front shocks. What's the shock of choice. KYB, Rancho, Monroe??

Tim
__________________
1981 K5 Blazer 305, 4spd, 4x4, 4" Lift, custom bumpers, Warn 9.5 Ti Winch
1995 T10 Blazer 4.3L 4x4 (Son's)
2004 GMC Envoy 4.2L 2WD
2005 GMC Sierra Crew Cab Z71 4x4 5.3L
240 Fun Finder Travel Trailer

Harvest, AL 35749
TC70C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2003, 10:12 PM   #2
TX_Mudder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 126
First off, the dual shocks are not needed and you should run a single shock. Dual shocks will make your ride very stiff. The factory dual shocks are valved very lightly to keep from jarring your fillings out, but the aftermarket ones you put in there will not be. You should runa single front shock.
I just got a set of Doetsch Tech shocks. They cost $33 each. They come highly recommended, but I haven't mounted them yet.
Don't buy Rancho 5000s.
If you have lots of money, buy rancho 9000s or Procomp 6-ways (I forget the model name.)

Also, I would not recommend just buying the shocks by just telling the part guy that you have a 2" lift or whatever - you need to measure.
Measure the total length of your shocks (front and back) when your truck is just sitting there - that is you middle travel length.
Then go to http://www.doetsch-shocks.com/trucks.php and find a shock that would fit.
For example, if your middle travel length is 25" and they sold a shock that is 20" compressed and 30" extended, then that would work great.

HTH
-- Mike
TX_Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 03:00 AM   #3
mike reeh
5 day ban, learn to behave.
 
mike reeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 684
i recommend the adjustable rancho's or if they make em for our trucks yet- the adjustable pro-comps.. I DO NOT recommend a 9K series shock, it will ride like a terd (ask me how I know)

the reason I recommend adjustable is so you can adjust em wayyy down for 90% of driving... I would not go with the monroe, simply because i have not heard anything about them performance wise, ever. procomp and rancho are both good choices but beware of too heavy a shock! thats the mistake I made and am regretting it now.

JUST my $0.02, others may disagree..

Mudder makes a good point about measuring. The procomps for a "four inch" lift were wayyyy too short for my truck with a "four inch lift"

good luck! and let us know what you decide to do..

mike
mike reeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 03:13 AM   #4
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
mike, what 9k series are you talking about? the Rancho RS9000s are the adjustable ones..??
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 09:31 AM   #5
TC70C10
Registered User
 
TC70C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Harvest, AL 35749
Posts: 337
Ditch the quad shocks in the front ??

Tim
__________________
1981 K5 Blazer 305, 4spd, 4x4, 4" Lift, custom bumpers, Warn 9.5 Ti Winch
1995 T10 Blazer 4.3L 4x4 (Son's)
2004 GMC Envoy 4.2L 2WD
2005 GMC Sierra Crew Cab Z71 4x4 5.3L
240 Fun Finder Travel Trailer

Harvest, AL 35749
TC70C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 11:28 AM   #6
solidaxel
Registered User
 
solidaxel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cactus Patch So. Az
Posts: 4,749
Bilstein Shocks

One word.............BILSTEIN
__________________
53 TuTone Extended Cab 350 4-Spd 3:08 (SOLD)
53 Chevy Moldy pearl green ZZ-4 4L60E 9" 3:25
55 GMC 1st Black Mll (ZZ4) ZZ6 TKO 600 5 sp 3:73
62 Solidaxle Corvette Roman Red (327
340hp 4spd 3:36) C4 & C5 suspension tube chassis
LS 3 4L70E
65 Corvette Coupe 327 350hp 4spd 4:11
78 Black Silverado SWB (350/350) 5.3 & 4L60E 3:42
2000 S-Type 3.0 (wife cruiser)
2003 GMC SCSB 5.3 4L60E 3:42
solidaxel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 04:05 PM   #7
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
I ran Rancho 9000's on my '81 4x4 and I think I ran them on #3 setting on the street. I didn't use the quad setup, I only used 1 shock. If you are going aftermarket, I would recommend not using the second set in front.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2003, 10:31 PM   #8
mike reeh
5 day ban, learn to behave.
 
mike reeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally posted by Prerunner1982
mike, what 9k series are you talking about? the Rancho RS9000s are the adjustable ones..??
I knew as soon as I submitted my reply that someone would catch me on that I see somewhat of a trend in the numbering conventions of truck shocks.. Im talking about 9K series in general (assuming there are other "9000" series besides rancho and procomp)... EXcluding the rancho's because they are adjustable (and only for that reason)...

make more sense?

mike
mike reeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 02:16 AM   #9
1976K5CHALET
Senior Member
 
1976K5CHALET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Junction, Colorado
Posts: 611
I've been impressed with my RS9000's....ride quality was immediately noticeable....

On the Quad issue....if you crawl the rocks...singles are best...i don't agree with duals being worthless though. If you read the article from peterson's from 1979 in "The History Of The Blazer 69-81"...they did an extensive road test starting with bone stock and ending with duals at each corner on a timed course recording shock tempature....worth reading.

Azblazer
1976K5CHALET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 03:06 AM   #10
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
Quote:
Originally posted by mike reeh


I knew as soon as I submitted my reply that someone would catch me on that I see somewhat of a trend in the numbering conventions of truck shocks.. Im talking about 9K series in general (assuming there are other "9000" series besides rancho and procomp)... EXcluding the rancho's because they are adjustable (and only for that reason)...

make more sense?

mike

no.. but its just me.... im stupid..
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 01:31 PM   #11
TC70C10
Registered User
 
TC70C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Harvest, AL 35749
Posts: 337
thanks for the reference to the article, I'll try to look it up.

Tim
__________________
1981 K5 Blazer 305, 4spd, 4x4, 4" Lift, custom bumpers, Warn 9.5 Ti Winch
1995 T10 Blazer 4.3L 4x4 (Son's)
2004 GMC Envoy 4.2L 2WD
2005 GMC Sierra Crew Cab Z71 4x4 5.3L
240 Fun Finder Travel Trailer

Harvest, AL 35749
TC70C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 03:39 PM   #12
TX_Mudder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally posted by TC70C10
Ditch the quad shocks in the front ??

Tim
Yes, ditch them.
The shocks the factory put up there are valved much lighter (softer) than any aftermarket ones you will buy.
If you want an aftermarket shock, then you really should go to single front shocks.
Yes, you can buy uber expensive shocks that will be lightly valved (for desert racing) that you could fit up front and yes, there would be less risk of shock fade because of it. But it you don't run 80 mph in the desert, you won't need the added shock fade resistance.
Don't buy Rancho 5000s whatever you do.
-- Mike
TX_Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 04:25 PM   #13
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
whats wrong with the rancho 5000s? thats what i am running...of course they were free and are for an s-10 blazer...
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 05:59 PM   #14
mike reeh
5 day ban, learn to behave.
 
mike reeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 684
one other thing if youre just looking for a stock replacement (which doesnt sound to be the case) then goto pep boys. They will have the correct shocks for dual factory front shocks.


mike
mike reeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com