Which set up is better? - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

**phase_one** · 04-20-2008, 04:55 PM

I have a 70 C-10. It has orginal 250 and 3 speed. I could put a 350 or 4l60 behind the 250 and add intake, headers, and carb for improved performance. I also have a 92 350 out of a 3/4 van to put in the 70 with the 4l60. The 350 is stock, but add ons are cheap and plenfiful. Like everyone else looking for power and gas mileage. I keep changing directions with this decesion daily and need to move on to get truck on the road. Chime in with thoughts no wrong or right answers, and good day.

68gmsee · 04-20-2008, 05:10 PM

I'm a stickler for originality now that I'm older, but I do have a 69 that I swapped a 350/350 in it and added ps and pb many year ago. Used to be a 250 three speed manual. I didn't gain any mpg but did get a stronger truck that was easier to drive.

Mpg on the original worn out 250 was about 14-15 on the highway and after the swap with a quadrajet I still got 14-15...

VA72C10 · 04-20-2008, 05:18 PM

Agreed, if you're going for originality or trying to keep it bone stock for value reasons, you should keep the 250. i know there are several on here who have upped the mpg with mods. But from a cost/benefit basis, i would do the 350 swap as you will have more power and potentially similar mileage depending on the add-ons you choose.

**phase_one** · 04-20-2008, 05:55 PM

I have p/s and p/b on the truck now. Is the 350 which is a vortec(92) any good? Keeping everything orginal in not a problem.

Highsteel · 04-20-2008, 06:57 PM

You should keep the 250 and send me the 350 vortec/4l60!!!!
Seriously, thought, I would opt for the swap. That is my plan. I have a 350 core, TPI set-up, still waiting on the OD tranny and a few misc engine parts for my 71.
Good luck however YOU choose to go!

Jerry

bigvinnie · 04-21-2008, 12:40 AM

if power and gas mileage is your goal, go smallblock cuz gas mileage is not much worse than the 6 and you'll appreciate having the power, no doubt....

**El Jay** · 04-21-2008, 01:00 AM

Nothing is better than good ol' fashion American V-8 horsepower.
In my not so humble opinion, of course.

Brad · 04-21-2008, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VA72C10

Agreed, if you're going for originality or trying to keep it bone stock for value reasons, you should keep the 250. i know there are several on here who have upped the mpg with mods. But from a cost/benefit basis, i would do the 350 swap as you will have more power and potentially similar mileage depending on the add-ons you choose.

Fred T · 04-21-2008, 09:41 AM

As much as I like the 250, they cost a bunch of money to upgrade. Headers, intake and a 4 barrel carb can easily run $800 to1,000 by the time you get all the needed accessories. And that still leaves you with a head that flows like molasses.

If you're not worried about originality and cost is a big factor, go with the SBC. If you want originality, or want to dare to be different, go with the six. If you really want power out of a six, find a 292. And get Leo Santucci's book on Chevy Sixes.

Me, I have a 69 with a 300 hp small block, and a 52 with a mostly stock 235. I like them both, and they both have their place.

04-20-2008, 04:55 PM	#1
phase_one Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Praireville. LA 70769 Posts: 390	Which set up is better? I have a 70 C-10. It has orginal 250 and 3 speed. I could put a 350 or 4l60 behind the 250 and add intake, headers, and carb for improved performance. I also have a 92 350 out of a 3/4 van to put in the 70 with the 4l60. The 350 is stock, but add ons are cheap and plenfiful. Like everyone else looking for power and gas mileage. I keep changing directions with this decesion daily and need to move on to get truck on the road. Chime in with thoughts no wrong or right answers, and good day. __________________ 11 Surbaban 70 C 10 still in progress

04-20-2008, 05:10 PM	#2
68gmsee Active Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area. Posts: 7,947	Re: Which set up is better? I'm a stickler for originality now that I'm older, but I do have a 69 that I swapped a 350/350 in it and added ps and pb many year ago. Used to be a 250 three speed manual. I didn't gain any mpg but did get a stronger truck that was easier to drive. Mpg on the original worn out 250 was about 14-15 on the highway and after the swap with a quadrajet I still got 14-15...

04-20-2008, 05:18 PM	#3
VA72C10 VA72C10 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Midlothian, VA Posts: 25,267	Re: Which set up is better? Agreed, if you're going for originality or trying to keep it bone stock for value reasons, you should keep the 250. i know there are several on here who have upped the mpg with mods. But from a cost/benefit basis, i would do the 350 swap as you will have more power and potentially similar mileage depending on the add-ons you choose.

04-20-2008, 05:55 PM	#4
phase_one Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Praireville. LA 70769 Posts: 390	Re: Which set up is better? I have p/s and p/b on the truck now. Is the 350 which is a vortec(92) any good? Keeping everything orginal in not a problem. __________________ 11 Surbaban 70 C 10 still in progress

04-20-2008, 06:57 PM	#5
Highsteel Chasin' the Dream Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Lost in the 70's Posts: 200	Re: Which set up is better? You should keep the 250 and send me the 350 vortec/4l60!!!! Seriously, thought, I would opt for the swap. That is my plan. I have a 350 core, TPI set-up, still waiting on the OD tranny and a few misc engine parts for my 71. Good luck however YOU choose to go! Jerry

04-21-2008, 12:40 AM	#6
bigvinnie Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: escondido, ca 92026 Posts: 1,222	Re: Which set up is better? if power and gas mileage is your goal, go smallblock cuz gas mileage is not much worse than the 6 and you'll appreciate having the power, no doubt.... __________________ '72 short step, 350, 700R4, tilt, ps, pdb, a/c, lowered coils, etc., other work in progress... San Diego, CA 72 Stepside Project

04-21-2008, 01:00 AM	#7
El Jay Gone to greener pastures Join Date: May 2007 Location: Gateway to the Delta Posts: 7,354	Re: Which set up is better? Nothing is better than good ol' fashion American V-8 horsepower. In my not so humble opinion, of course. __________________ '69 Chevy 1/2 T LWB Stepper: Daily Beater '72 GMC 3/4 T Fleet: Another Daily Beater '72 Plymouth Gran Coupe: ? "Ah women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." Friedrich Nietzsche "Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day." Harry S. Truman GUN CONTROL: Never having to say, "I missed you." Always fire two warning shots into your attacker's chest area before putting a bullet between his eyes. Paraphrased from Louis Awerbuck

04-21-2008, 09:41 AM	#9
Fred T Cantankerous Geezer Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Bel Aire, KS Posts: 6,264	Re: Which set up is better? As much as I like the 250, they cost a bunch of money to upgrade. Headers, intake and a 4 barrel carb can easily run $800 to1,000 by the time you get all the needed accessories. And that still leaves you with a head that flows like molasses. If you're not worried about originality and cost is a big factor, go with the SBC. If you want originality, or want to dare to be different, go with the six. If you really want power out of a six, find a 292. And get Leo Santucci's book on Chevy Sixes. Me, I have a 69 with a 300 hp small block, and a 52 with a mostly stock 235. I like them both, and they both have their place. __________________ Fred There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.