![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
|
Better impact....which choice?
OK I need to geta engine in my 96 2500 4wd burb....I was thinking about a 4.3 but have since discovered there is a big weight difference between the burb and astro van so I need more power. So my choices are now limited to finding a 5.7 Vortec along with all computer controls. Or I can have my 7.4 Vortec rebuilt and not change a thing. What I am wondering is how much of a difference would I really see in mileage in exchange for the headache of changing everything? Because I still have the 4.11 gear ratio in the back, I cant afford a 350 change over and a gear swap. However I can afford a rebuilt 454 with a 3.73 in the back. My question is would this eual out and what would my milage be with the 454 after I change the rear gearing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Suspended
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Claremore, Oklahoma
Posts: 821
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
Ok you have a 3/4 ton Burb that came with a 454, rebuild the 454 and save the headache.
A wiring harness swap, computer swap and engine sway will be to big of a headache. Either way you're not going to get great mpg with it being a 3/4 ton burb so just keep the 454 and you'll get about 15mpg or a lil less. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
What if I was to add a electric fan, dual exhaust, street legal headers, performance cats and mufflers? Would that help in mileage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Suspended
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Claremore, Oklahoma
Posts: 821
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
Add that to the 454 and you'll do alot better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
I might also change the gearing on the rear end. I think that would do wonders!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cocoa florida
Posts: 183
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
Mark
Last edited by impalamark; 07-08-2008 at 10:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account Suspended
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Claremore, Oklahoma
Posts: 821
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
You going to put towing gears in? Lower gears means reduced mpg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
LOL...did I mix that up? I will be putting in a more fuel economy gear ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 365
|
Re: Better impact....which choice?
I have 3.42's in my 05 with the 5.3 and it still has plenty of get up and go for me...1500 RPM at 55, can't beat that.
__________________
Andy... '70 C/10 Under Construction http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=298553 '71 K/20 Frame-off resto, SOLD!!! http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/c...ct=2399&cat=12 '05 Silverado Z-71, CC SB, Daily Driver |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|