![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Its Deja Vu time again
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marysville, North of Seattle WA
Posts: 815
|
Re: Lowering ???'s
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 6
|
Re: Lowering ???'s
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,149
|
Re: Lowering ???'s
Quote:
The draw-back is it's also pretty basic so there's no playing around or dumping the air for the 'on the rails' look. Check out posts 12~14 here for ride height & costs on a budget 'combo' set-up . ..... http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...highlight=bags .
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 10-29-2008 at 11:41 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|