|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-24-2008, 09:19 PM
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Madison, Ohio
Posts: 21,400
|
Re: Short Bed VS Long Bed Fleet Value
Geeeeeeeeee...the more I read the more confused I'm getting.
 To be fully honest and don't tell no one...If I could have a choice of my 70cst in a swb or lwb...Heck yes I would take a swb...be that as it is...I found my 70cst in Tn. It was a LWB fully loaded BB cst for about $2300....and to me $$$ talks. But as all have said...do what makes you happy. Like some have said...Some like diet coke (me-I now like LWB trucks) while others like classic coke. There are no wrong answers. Ok I'll say it....LWB are good for the "LONG" haul while the SWB trucks always come up "SHORT"  Sorry...I couldn't help myself. Forgive me guys! 
__________________
A husband can be right...or...A husband can be happy. 67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks...The Classic Truck for the Classic Folk.  1970 CST Two tone green, 402BB, 400 Automatic, Tach, Buckets, AC, AM-FM, Tilt, GM CB, GM 8 Tract, LWB, etc   JOHN 17:3...The better side of "LIFE" Remember: Everyday is a good day...Some are just gooder! Last edited by 70cst; 11-24-2008 at 11:02 PM. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| long bed, short bed, versus |
|
|
Threaded Mode