Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-18-2009, 02:27 PM | #1 |
Another Day, Another Dollar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,316
|
another rear-end ratio question
hey guys
i'm running a lifted '78 lwb with a 454, NP205, and a turbo 400 on 35's i have 3.73's in a 14 bolt and i'm spinning about 3200 RPM at 110 km/h ( i think about 65 MPH) if i were to throw some new hardware in my diff do y'all think 3.42 would be reasonable? any other suggetsions? i don't do alot of wheeling in my truck, but i am known to get her stuck in the mud on occasion
__________________
-78 K20 Cheyenne 454 long box, 4" lift, 35" MT's, '84 cab, '80 box "its hip to be square" |
01-20-2009, 01:34 AM | #2 |
thinair
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: omaha,ne
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
whats wrong with what you are running right now?
|
01-20-2009, 01:45 AM | #3 |
Another Day, Another Dollar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,316
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
i work up north,
the highways are long and straight up there, and it erks me a bit to be confined to 65 mph overdrive would be nice, but i'm trying to go faster for cheaper.
__________________
-78 K20 Cheyenne 454 long box, 4" lift, 35" MT's, '84 cab, '80 box "its hip to be square" |
01-20-2009, 01:49 AM | #4 |
thinair
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: omaha,ne
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
then 3.42s would probablly be good for you
|
01-20-2009, 01:52 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami now in Vegas
Posts: 828
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
If your worried about those rpm's being so high I would keep the 3:73 and do an overdrive transmisson. Since its lifted with big tires I would go with 3:23 or 3:42
__________________
Long live SLIM ------------------ At least try to buy American |
01-20-2009, 02:14 AM | #6 |
One shot, one kill.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 859
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
Willett, If I'm not mistaken your truck came with 235-85R16 tires. They are 31" tall. Going to 35" effectivly got you 3.42 gears. Something is wrong here. I am running 3.08 gears and turning 2300 to 2400 at 65 on 31" rubber. That about fits what I was getting with 4.10 gears, 60 MPG at 3000 RPM (speedo was calibrated and was using a Sun super tach). I think you had better check and see where your going wrong. Are you sure of the rear end ratio? Did you check your speed over a measured mile or just use the speedo? Lastly, is your tach correct? You might just be going faster than you think. You won't feel the difference between 65 and 75 and 3200 RPM should put you about 75. jim
__________________
1984 K20 350M engine with 465,000 miles. Well, it's finally done!! Almost 2 years of work, but it was really worth the effort. Little stuff left to do is mount winch, wet sand & buff out and build belly pan\running boards. Body work takes lots and LOTS of beer!!!! God, Guts and Guns made America and God, Guts and Guns will preserve it! The worst thing you could do is get into my sights, but that don't matter, you'll never know it, cause you'll never hear the shotJim or Paladin whichever you choose. |
01-20-2009, 02:28 AM | #7 |
Another Day, Another Dollar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,316
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
perhaps i don't have 3:73's
the guy whom i bought the truck off of told me that that is what was in there, but the more work i do to the truck, i realize the less that the previous owner knew about it!
__________________
-78 K20 Cheyenne 454 long box, 4" lift, 35" MT's, '84 cab, '80 box "its hip to be square" |
01-20-2009, 04:27 AM | #8 |
One shot, one kill.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 859
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
Willett, pop the cover off the rear end, look for the part number. Near the part number will be 4 numbers seperated by a ":" divide the larger number by the smaller one and that will give you the ratio. 15:41 would be 2.73 as an example. Yours will be different, like 62:15 would be 4.13 ect.
__________________
1984 K20 350M engine with 465,000 miles. Well, it's finally done!! Almost 2 years of work, but it was really worth the effort. Little stuff left to do is mount winch, wet sand & buff out and build belly pan\running boards. Body work takes lots and LOTS of beer!!!! God, Guts and Guns made America and God, Guts and Guns will preserve it! The worst thing you could do is get into my sights, but that don't matter, you'll never know it, cause you'll never hear the shotJim or Paladin whichever you choose. |
01-21-2009, 02:10 AM | #9 |
Another Day, Another Dollar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,316
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
thanks james, i will take a looksee when i get a chance!
__________________
-78 K20 Cheyenne 454 long box, 4" lift, 35" MT's, '84 cab, '80 box "its hip to be square" |
01-21-2009, 02:51 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: where it's hot
Posts: 1,059
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
With 35' tires your spedometer is reading low , you are doing more than 110 KM/HR at 3200 RPM .
|
01-21-2009, 03:37 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
|
Re: another rear-end ratio question
With 4.10s and 35" tires, 70 should be 26/2700-ish RPMS.....
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS |
Bookmarks |
|
|