The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2009, 11:52 PM   #26
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,963
Re: Front track too wide

Quote:
Originally Posted by CG View Post
I haven't done the swap yet. I'm going by what Ive read on the board. I have already purchased my spindles and disk kit. You're the first person that's given a definitive yes to the after the swap to disks the front track now equals all the disk brake trucks (well, up to a certain year).
I did measure my 68 before/after & I seem to recall it was closer to .500" wider per side w/the discs vs. drums (my info said to expect .375" difference). This was w/factory 68 a-arms, 73-87 spindles (1.25" rotors), 73-87 steering assembly, & the factory 68 manual pitman/idler arms. Was the truck you based your numbers off of lowered? If so, how?

I used 6.5" van ralleys & had no issues w/about 6" of front drop.

You mentioned this was going to be a road warrior so you wanted the same size tire all around. Would you consider the same height all around? That would get you closer to your goal w/o having to resort to an air suspension (which it sounds like you don't want). A 215-75-15 is less than .500" difference in height & would work well on a 6.5-7" wheel & compliment the rear sizing for good symmetry. A 215-75 spare is easier to conceal & would work @ every corner.

Pic below is w/215-75's & 275-60's on 6.5" & 8" wheels respectively. Food for thought . . . ....
Attached Images
 
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-27-2009 at 11:58 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 01:22 AM   #27
CG
BlahBlahBlah
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wa.
Posts: 19,861
Re: Front track too wide

I didnt know that was your truck...I really like it. Its one of the couple I was going back and forth on when trying to decide my tire size.
__________________
… … … … … … … … ... … … … … … … … … … … …
CG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:01 AM   #28
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,963
Re: Front track too wide

Quote:
Originally Posted by CG View Post
I didnt know that was your truck...I really like it. Its one of the couple I was going back and forth on when trying to decide my tire size.
Thanks. The sizes I listed were eventually replaced w/215-75's & 255-70's to help the 6cyl/3spd/3.73 combo on the road. Unfortunately..... that truck got a Dropmember & then got disassembled .
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-28-2009 at 02:01 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com