The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2009, 11:45 PM   #1
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I have a 67 short wide I am making a drag truck out of.
It has a 500 cad engine with a 400 trans.
Currently the frame has been cut off about mid kick up, but the trailing arms are still attached.
I am planning on getting the cad to between 6-700 hp. This will be a race only truck. I will run slicks or drag radials. I plan on installing a full cage plus what else will need to be done to stiffen up the frame.

Okay, will the stock trailing arms and coil over work best for this or should I go ahead and install a 4 link? I have to back half this truck anyway.

Lee
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 12:23 PM   #2
Tmiller
slims 68
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marshall Mi
Posts: 55
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I'd just go ahead and 4link it, alot more adjustability, and better suited for a drag race set up.
__________________
68 c10 LWB, blown 454 , 550 hp & 600 tq est.
06 Chevy Cobalt SS supercharged 2.0L
08 Chevy silverado crew cab 1/2 ton 2wd 5.3L, she wont let me put a supercharger on it.
Tmiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 12:40 PM   #3
regan wilson
Senior Member
 
regan wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: tyler texas
Posts: 1,536
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I have a 4-Link but I believe I would just do the Trailing Arm setup . Though my 4-Link works good for me ! It is also kind of a headache becuase I am all the time having to scale it to make sure all the weights are right . DJ puts allot more than 600 or 700hp to his and his truck flies .
__________________
NHRA Super Street 469C
It only runs 10.90 at 156 mph
regan wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 07:08 PM   #4
Garagedude
Registered User
 
Garagedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Summerville SC
Posts: 217
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

My plan is to stick with the trailing arms and do a coil over suspension, eventually I am going to either build or buy a set of tubular trailing arms.
Garagedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 02:08 AM   #5
custom72c20
Registered User
 
custom72c20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 309
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I would personally stick with the trailing arms, but I would make some out chromoly. Djracer runs trailing arms and his truck is quick. It would be cheaper in the long run too.
__________________
Nick

Old pic of my 72: http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0435co5.jpg
04 Silverado Daily Driver
68 GMC short step http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=379665

"I'll beat you to the gas station!!"

custom72c20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 06:11 PM   #6
djracer
Registered User
 
djracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wetumpka, Al, U.S.
Posts: 8,891
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Another vote for Trailing Arms. Another advantage is if you keep it somewhat stock you can run some stock suspension classes. My full frame is still there front to rear with a c notch to get it lower. My front suspension is also bolt on so if the class allows Kmembers then my stuff is legal. I would also leave the firewall as stock as possible. There is allot of strength in a stock floor and firewall.
__________________
Kevin

Special Thanks to All who have helped on the TRUCK!

My Pass Time Show http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p...Chapter1-0.mp4

So Far my best Times are:

Motor only:
6.44 1/8 @ 104.13
10.39 1/4 @ 125.83

Nitrous Times:
5.785 1/8 @ 118.65 with a 1.336 60ft
9.168 1/4 @ 142.58 with a 250 shot dead out of the hole!
djracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 06:52 PM   #7
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by djracer View Post
another vote for trailing arms. Another advantage is if you keep it somewhat stock you can run some stock suspension classes. My full frame is still there front to rear with a c notch to get it lower. My front suspension is also bolt on so if the class allows kmembers then my stuff is legal. I would also leave the firewall as stock as possible. There is allot of strength in a stock floor and firewall.


+1
__________________
------Motor---------------Bottle
60'---1.53---------------1.41
1/8---6.58 @ 105.92----5.87 @ 118.41
1/4---10.38 @ 126.97----9.24 @ 142.49
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 09:18 PM   #8
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by djracer View Post
I would also leave the firewall as stock as possible. There is allot of strength in a stock floor and firewall.
Unfortunately the firewall was already cut by the PO.

I appreciate the input. I had thought the trailing arm would win out, especially since djracer was running one and going quicker.

I am only planning to bracket race, is the non-stock firewall a potential problem for that?

Regan, thanks for the feedback, i was just thinking of looking up the info on yours to see what you are running.

Okay, that brings up the next question. What can i do to stiffen up the frame? I plan to install a 8 pt cage. Should that do enough? And is there a way to install the cage to where the cab is still removable?
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 09:52 PM   #9
custom72c20
Registered User
 
custom72c20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 309
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I don't have any answers to the questions you have above, but I am curious why are you running that caddi motor besides the fact that it came with the truck when you got it. You could build a big block chevy cheaper and they are easier to find parts for. Just curious. Thanks
__________________
Nick

Old pic of my 72: http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0435co5.jpg
04 Silverado Daily Driver
68 GMC short step http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=379665

"I'll beat you to the gas station!!"

custom72c20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2009, 09:55 PM   #10
hotrod 80
mini truck racer
 
hotrod 80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baytown , texas
Posts: 3,010
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I vote trailing arms or ladderbars
__________________
1949 5-window
1969 Camaro
1976 Chevy Luv yellow
1978 Chevy Luv Blue
1976 Chevy Luv Black
1979 Firebird Flooded in Harvey
1999 F350 Dually
2005 GMC Sierra 4.8 RCSB
2014 Explorer (wifes)

My build :http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399148

Build #2: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=653583
hotrod 80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 12:22 AM   #11
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by custom72c20 View Post
I don't have any answers to the questions you have above, but I am curious why are you running that caddi motor besides the fact that it came with the truck when you got it. You could build a big block chevy cheaper and they are easier to find parts for. Just curious. Thanks
I like the idea of being different.
After getting the truck, I got to reading on the big block cads and thought I'd try it. They are suppose to have better blocks (higher nickel content), better factory machining (more square than most) and they only weigh 60 lbs more than a sbc. The real limiting factor seems to be the valve train. I plan to turbo it soon after getting it going, that should help make up for the port design and the weak rocker system. I don't plan twisting it past 5200. At that it should be in the 6-650 HP and 650 to 700 lbs of torque.
They are cheaper around here than big block chevs and aren't that hard to come by. I am going the csob route and seeing how much fun i can have for the dollar.
Time will tell how well this plan works.
Lee
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 01:02 PM   #12
djracer
Registered User
 
djracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wetumpka, Al, U.S.
Posts: 8,891
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

how much of the firewall is cut out?
__________________
Kevin

Special Thanks to All who have helped on the TRUCK!

My Pass Time Show http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p...Chapter1-0.mp4

So Far my best Times are:

Motor only:
6.44 1/8 @ 104.13
10.39 1/4 @ 125.83

Nitrous Times:
5.785 1/8 @ 118.65 with a 1.336 60ft
9.168 1/4 @ 142.58 with a 250 shot dead out of the hole!
djracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 10:18 PM   #13
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

full from side to side, even the wire gutter/channel is gone. He put 16 ga. sheet in with a modded wheel barrow tubs for the recess of the engine.
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 11:42 PM   #14
custom72c20
Registered User
 
custom72c20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 309
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1953mdl View Post
I like the idea of being different.
After getting the truck, I got to reading on the big block cads and thought I'd try it. They are suppose to have better blocks (higher nickel content), better factory machining (more square than most) and they only weigh 60 lbs more than a sbc. The real limiting factor seems to be the valve train. I plan to turbo it soon after getting it going, that should help make up for the port design and the weak rocker system. I don't plan twisting it past 5200. At that it should be in the 6-650 HP and 650 to 700 lbs of torque.
They are cheaper around here than big block chevs and aren't that hard to come by. I am going the csob route and seeing how much fun i can have for the dollar.
Time will tell how well this plan works.
Lee
sounds like fun.
__________________
Nick

Old pic of my 72: http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0435co5.jpg
04 Silverado Daily Driver
68 GMC short step http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=379665

"I'll beat you to the gas station!!"

custom72c20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 01:28 AM   #15
hotrod 80
mini truck racer
 
hotrod 80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baytown , texas
Posts: 3,010
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I like it . Put a 3.08 or 3.42 in it and make it grunt . Lots of torque right there . What bell housing bolt pattern is it ?
__________________
1949 5-window
1969 Camaro
1976 Chevy Luv yellow
1978 Chevy Luv Blue
1976 Chevy Luv Black
1979 Firebird Flooded in Harvey
1999 F350 Dually
2005 GMC Sierra 4.8 RCSB
2014 Explorer (wifes)

My build :http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399148

Build #2: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=653583
hotrod 80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 07:38 PM   #16
phipp13
THE DAMN YANKEE
 
phipp13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 551
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

check out my homemade ladderbars. they should work real good 48" long. good luck phipp13
phipp13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 12:31 AM   #17
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod 80 View Post
I like it . Put a 3.08 or 3.42 in it and make it grunt . Lots of torque right there . What bell housing bolt pattern is it ?
It is regular BOP. I even have an extra or two. I was thinking maybe even high 2.XX but at least a 3.08.
Lee
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 12:40 AM   #18
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by phipp13 View Post
check out my homemade ladderbars. they should work real good 48" long. good luck phipp13
I'll be watching to see how they work, look good.
Lee
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 11:33 PM   #19
hotrod 80
mini truck racer
 
hotrod 80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baytown , texas
Posts: 3,010
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Ladder bars are kinda set it and forget it . Kinda depends on how fast your gonna go . Lot's of 10.5 guys been really fast on ladder bars . Of coarse im still a nobody with a stock suspension , small block , on DOTs .
__________________
1949 5-window
1969 Camaro
1976 Chevy Luv yellow
1978 Chevy Luv Blue
1976 Chevy Luv Black
1979 Firebird Flooded in Harvey
1999 F350 Dually
2005 GMC Sierra 4.8 RCSB
2014 Explorer (wifes)

My build :http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399148

Build #2: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=653583
hotrod 80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 12:09 AM   #20
phipp13
THE DAMN YANKEE
 
phipp13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 551
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

ya, im a long way off 10.5s this year anyway. shauns dyno says about 11.47 got to get it built first and then repower it next year.
phipp13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 11:37 PM   #21
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod 80 View Post
Ladder bars are kinda set it and forget it . Kinda depends on how fast your gonna go . Lot's of 10.5 guys been really fast on ladder bars . Of coarse im still a nobody with a stock suspension , small block , on DOTs .
You mighty fast for a "nobody".
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:09 PM   #22
w/gcd72
Registered User
 
w/gcd72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dale, Indiana
Posts: 41
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

hey this is about the engine. check the april '08 edition of hot rod, the built a 541 ci stroker out of a 500 ci caddy and made 526 hp, and 649lb-ft n/a with bulldog aluminum heads from Maximum Torque Specialists. Just thought that might be helpful!
__________________
1972 C10 Custom Deluxe Longbed Fleetside (currently apart in the garage)
'69 C10 Custom Deluxe Shortbed Fleetside (all original, including the brown recluses!)
1990 C1500 Shortbed Sportside
w/gcd72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 10:20 AM   #23
a1953mdl
Rusty but Trusty
 
a1953mdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Re: trailing arms vs 4 link rear

I'll have to dig thru and see if I can find that one.
Thanks for the heads up.
Lee
__________________
72 SWB, 454 / th400... hoping the kids don't get all the parts before it gets built
a1953mdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com